Preview

Why Is Freedom So Important

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
698 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Freedom So Important
Why is freedom so important? What about our constitution makes people liberated from our governments’ all-embracing grasp? I ask these questions because you as American citizens deserve the right to know why “We the people” are united to secure the blessings of liberty we were granted so many years ago. The majority of our Founding Fathers were Federalists. They believed that one large government should not have absolute power over smaller ones. These men played a key role in the fight for independence of our young nation and deserve credit when due. The most important right we as Americans can exercise is the 10th amendment. It limits the federal government’s ability to interfere with domestic interests. It allows the people to decide whether or not they agree with a bill being passed. It gives the states the power to be free from certain federal limitations. …show more content…
We have earned the privilege to finally make our own decisions without someone breathing down our necks. Each state can be independent and retain its jurisdiction in matters separate from that of the US Government. This does not limit the Federal Government's ability to fulfill the duties it owes to the constitution. In fact, the US can still make very important decisions within the three branches of government. A state cannot declare war on another country or pass a federal law as congress cannot impose a state tax or change the minimum wage in the state of Washington. These limitation are important to Federalism to curb both State and Federal power. In the case of Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, a man left land to his nephew after he died. The state of Virginia decided that the land was theirs and gave it back to themselves. The Supreme Court fought this, saying that the Virginia Court was not entitled to this man’s land. Since they were not equal powers, the US could override the state to enforce a uniform system of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In politics everyone has a different opinion and it seems as if they never come to a compromise. This issue has been going on for many years now. As early as when this nation was first being built. Throughout history there have been times when the government has been at conflict. Many of these conflicts include the question as to who has more power and who should. If the states should or the national government. Two important cases in the past that have helped answer these questions are McCulloch vs. Maryland and Gibbons vs. Ogden. Both cases present conflicts that brought among state courts, which later end up being appealed in the Supreme Court and rule differently twice. Both cases ruling clear show a clear example as how the national government has a supremacy over the state government.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation Of Powers Dbq

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At first, some of the first people in America didn’t want to have a federal government that had too much power. The Founding Fathers created the Constitution of the United States of America after the Articles of Confederation failed. There are numerous documents in the Constitution that limit the federal government in many ways. For example there is a system called Checks and Balances that gives certain powers to each branch. In the United States, there is something called the Separation of Powers which also limits the federal government. It keeps one branch of government from becoming too powerful against the other branches. Furthermore, the Bill of Rights also limits the federal government. Also known as the first ten additions or amendments to the Constitution, the Bill of Rights protect individual liberties. As you can…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    constitution gives us the freedom of speech expressed by the first amendment. The first amendment gives us the liberty to express our own opinion about something. It also gives us a sort of independence by letting us speak freely instead of following someone else opinion because anything else would of been considered illegal. For example, before the colonists immigrated to America, England and there they were required to have a certain religion set by the King. Every person was required to be either protestant or catholic depending on the King’s preference. The colonists grew tired when the king changed it so many times and they wanted to have their own religion so they moved to…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ex-Post Facto Analysis

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When the writers of the first ten amendments of the Constitution wrote, them they wanted to protect the rights of the citizens to ensure that ex-post facto could not place their liberties in jeopardy (McAllister, 1927). The protection of freedom in the of our citizens ensures…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    al. 2014: 34) There was no executive or judicial authority and therefore no means of enforcing the Congress’s will and hence the states would do it for the Congress. Therefore, to prevent conflicts and turmoil between the various states and to reach to a common solution, the Constitution provided for vesting certain important powers within the federal government and not to the states.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The heart of the constitution is the National Supremacy Clause, which states that the constitution and federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land," meaning it is superior to the law of the states. I personally do not think that the federal laws should always supersede state laws, but there can be times in which the federal government wants the entire country on the same page and they can use their power to do so. The federal government should create laws that effects, and sometimes benefits the country as a whole. The states, on the other hand, should create laws that are unique to the people living in them that do not interfere with the laws set by the federal government.…

    • 122 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some states would not abide by all of the federal government laws that where set or make their own laws that interfered with ones that were made. The Public Administration Quarterly said “The constitutions provided for varying degrees of decentralization. Nome, however, were as decentralized as the national government under the Articles. In all states, there was an executive in some form and in New York, Massachusetts, and Hew Hampshire he was elected by the people at large. Other states, however, provided for an executive chosen by a legislature or legislatively appointed body. In most states, the executive was essentially part of the legislature.” The US Constitution divides power between the Federal government and state governments. Giving certain power to the federal government to keep the country in stability to grow in the future like declare war on another country or treaties so the entire country stays on one side of the decision. When the federal government makes a law, the states have to follow it and change any laws that has conflict with it to fit within the parameters of the law. The States have reserved powers with are specifically for the states to regulate. This was the tenth amendment to the constitution and has similar tis to the Articles of…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    national governments powers. The idea of federalism is mentioned in the constitution and it is the division of powers between state and national governments, however there are often conflicts between these state governments with the national governments on which laws that states can and cannot enact. The tenth amendment of the constitution states the Constitution's principle of federalism by providing that powers not granted to the federal government by the Constitution, nor prohibited to the States, are reserved to the states or the people; This is known as the reserve clause and the powers obtained by states from this are known as the reserved powers. The problem with this is that there are many modern day issues that the constitution does not cover such as the topic of abortion. So depending on your interpretation of the constitution you could argue that decisions on abortion should be made by the national government, however you could also argue that since the states and federal governments are both not granted powers on this issue in the constitution that it should automatically be granted to the…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the founding fathers drafted the Constitution, they made sure to give the federal government certain powers and the same for the states. Yet overtime, the Constitution has been interpreted in different ways hence giving the federal government more power than it was originally intended to have. At the same time the states have lost some of its power as the federal government gained jurisdiction over certain things.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution was written for the welfare of the people Our Constituaional rights are very important. Without these rights, the United States would not be any different from other places in the world, who do not have as many rights as we do. Our rights secure the liberties and ensure justice for all.…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each human being that ever walked on the face of this earth has been granted very specific and important rights. The rights that are given to us all are, life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Each one of these rights allows oneself to choose how their life is to be lived, not how others want their lives to end up. With two rights becoming taken out, with the one left that we have to live by up to the choosing, is a daunting task. Without liberty, everyone will end up under someone's control with no say.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The United States was founded on economic and political freedom. This freedom enables all our citizens to successfully pursue unlimited opportunities to use their god given talents to work, produce, invest, take risk, and grow wealthy while keeping the prosperous fruits of their enterprise. Here we have state governments that are “laboratories of government” and a notional government that has more autonomy than the state government. The state governments have some type of autonomy but the national government is stronger even if they are not close to those individuals the serve.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to establish and preserve freedom in a system of government, at its core, it must be created to provide the power to the people. This is evident when looking at the government of America. It has a federal government to deal with national matters, but the structural integrity of the state governments is still maintained so that they could still have the power to influence decisions. Similarly, the Bill of Rights gives the citizens a bulwark against tyranny. These factors of a multi-faceted government are what lead to America being one of the greatest nations in the world.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Being an American has many definitions, but for everyone it is different. In this country, you have many freedoms. You’re given opportunities that can benefit you. And you are allowed individuality. As an American, you are free to express yourself.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Is Freedom

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In What is Freedom Hannah Arendt argues that freedom is related to “the political realm” rather than “the inner domain”. Arendt points out in the opening of her essay the need to “eliminate the greatest and mist dangerous difficulty, namely, that thought itself, in its theoretical as will as its pre-theoretical form, makes freedom disappear – quite apart from the fact that it must appear strange indeed that the faculty of the will whose essential activity consists in dictate and command should be the harborer of freedom.” (Arendt 439) What’s the logic behind Arendt’s opposition to the notion that equals freedom to free will? What’s the “theoretical” and “pre-theoretical form” of thought according to Arendt? And why would she contend that thought makes freedom disappear?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays