Preview

Why Is Great Britain Justified In Civil Disobedience?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
560 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Great Britain Justified In Civil Disobedience?
Through this speech, Chamberlain rallies his constituents and attempts to send a clear message to the European nations regarding Great Britain’s stance toward German aggression. Towards the end of the speech, he states: “I do not believe there is anyone who will question my sincerity when I say there is hardly anything I would not sacrifice for peace. But there is one thing that I must except, and that is the liberty that we have enjoyed for hundreds of years, and which we will never surrender.” In the face of an inevitable war, Great Britain will not lose its identity nor will it succumb to the pressures of the German Empire. Chamberlain’s attempts for peace have been exhausted; Great Britain has no option left but to fight. In the passage, Chamberlain references the liberty of Great …show more content…
Chamberlain makes the point that the liberty of each independent state of Europe is at risk if no intervention occurs. Each nation that has the capability of resisting German aggression and intervening in the situation has a duty to preserve liberty; Great Britain does not stand alone in this fight. Chamberlain concludes his speech by saying:
I feel bound to repeat that, while I am not prepared to engage this country by new unspecified commitments operating under conditions which cannot now be foreseen, yet no greater mistake could be made than to suppose that, because it believes war to be a senseless and cruel thing, this nation has so lost its fibre that it will not take part to the utmost of its power in resisting such a challenge if it ever were made. For that declaration I am convinced that I have not merely the support, the sympathy, the confidence of my fellow-countrymen and countrywomen, but I shall have also the approval of the whole British Empire and of all other nations who value peace, indeed, but who value freedom even

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One argument is the view that appeasement was the only realistic option because public opinion supported it and for Chamberlain to lead Britain to war would go against public favour. The First World War savaged Europe and Britain was hit very hard in terms of Human losses. Many families lost men within the family and left psychological scars nationwide. Chamberlain was therefore desperate to avoid another war on the continent at all costs. If Britain was to go to war they would have to rearm and build on their armed forces which had been neglected since world war one. However public opinion was that if Britain was rearming then they would be preparing for war, which was incredible unpopular. Evidence of this was in east Fulham by-election of 1933 the conservative who advocated rearmament turned a majority of 14,000 into a defeat by 5000 at the hands of his labour approach who supported disarmament. This illustrated the political affect that rearmament and policies that move towards War had which was a reason as to why Chamberlain saw appeasement as the only realistic option.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People sometimes wonder if America should have stayed with Great Britain. They say it would have gotten good profits, but I am going to explain why the colonist were justified in fighting and breaking away from Great Britain. The French and Indian war happened in 1750. After the war, British were in debt and placed taxes on colonist. The colonist were shocked and angry that they were being taxed. Waging war and breaking away Britain was justified for the colonist. The colonist were justified in fighting and breaking away from Great Britain because British were making unfair taxes, the colonist weren’t represented in parliament, and British were violating the colonist rights.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Initially, Prime Minister William Lyon Mackenzie King warmly supported British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain's policy of appeasing German leader Adolf Hitler. When Chamberlain postponed war by sacrificing Czechoslovakia in the Munich crisis of September 1938, King thanked him publicly, and Canadians in general certainly agreed. Nevertheless, the shock of this crisis likely turned opinion towards accepting war to check the advance of Nazism. Only gradually did ongoing Nazi aggression alter this mood to the point where Canada was prepared to take part in another great war. King himself had no doubt that in a great war involving Britain, Canada could not stand aside.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    “What is our task? To make Britain a fit country for heroes to live in”. David Lloyd George , Wolverhampton 1918…

    • 4686 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Whately, advisor to George Grenville, the British chancellor of the Exchequer, was correct by saying in Document 1, "We are not yet recovered from a war solely fought for their protection." Whately was referring to the French and Indian War (1754-1763). This war indeed cost Britain much, and I do believe the colonists were greatful. However, Britain, after 1763, did not allow the colonists to move west. The colonies were increasing by becoming crowded. New taxes angered them as well. Not being represented in Parliament was tyranny. "Taxation without Representation" was the battle cry. The Stamp Act of 1765 started it all. Every paper, from playing cards to legal documents were taxed. Document 2 refers to this tax as well as the Townsend Act which required the colonists to pay a tax on all British goods. According to Document 2, this taxes purpose was for simply "Levying money upon us". Still, this tax like the Stamp Act, was levied without representation in Parliament. Colonists boycotted British goods in favor of their own manufactured goods. The 13 colonies were gradually becoming aware of self-government. Men like Patrick Henry and John Dickinson considered these taxes unconstitutional. They voiced their opinions openly.…

    • 707 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1763 marked the end of French and Indian war and caused a great celebration and pride in the American colonies. But, in next twelve years, the same pride was altered by at bitter and violent conflict with the mother country. The injustices of the mother country finally led the American colonists to declare independence and wage war against it. American colonies were justified for waging war and breaking away from Britain because they were defending themselves against a series of measures Parliament wished to impose on their communities without their consent.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When giving a speech a speaker must be able to connect with his audience, the speaker wants his/her speech to be easy to follow and easy to understand. It is for those specific reasons that speakers purposely put in lots of logos, pathos, and ethos into their speeches so that the audiences can connect emotionally, ethically, and intellectually with what they are talking about. A particular speech that uses many examples of pathos, logos, and ethos is The Great Arsenal of Democracy given by President Roosevelt on December 29, 1940. Throughout the speech President Roosevelt uses excessive amounts of pathos to connect with his people emotionally. He plays on their pride, fear, and the feelings of shame. He uses logos to express the facts and reasoning behind why the American people should help the British. The president knows that his people won’t go on blind faith; they need facts and reasoning to help the British. It is also because of the knowledge that the American won’t go blindly into war just to help, that he also puts lots of ethos into it to appeal to their ethical side. FDR wants the American people to see him as a strong leader who has a plan, as well as; the best interest for his people in mind. He is truthful and honest with them and lays down the line that if they don’t help the UK that America will be in even greater danger if the UK was to fall to the Nazis. It is for the safety of America that the president wants his people to feel emotionally, ethically, and intellectually unified with Great Britain so that by saving them they can save themselves from an even bigger threat down the road.…

    • 2351 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    People think that if they truly trust someone they can obey them without any doubt. This is correct and wrong at the same time, but however; people need to know what the orders are or tasks that they are obeying because you never really know someone until they show their true colors. WWII all started because people trusted Hitler and believed what he said and wanted was always right. He made people believe that Jews were evil, Jews were the cause of every single bad thing, and by twisting peoples’ mind he murdered 6 million Jews. There will continue to be people who are gullible enough to follow anyone and believe what they are doing is right.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ` Appeasement in a political context is a diplomatic policy of making political or material concessions to an enemy power in order to avoid conflict. The term is most often applied to the foreign policy of the British Prime Ministers Ramsay Macdonald, Stanley Baldwin and Neville Chamberlain towards Nazi Germany between 1935 and 1939. Their policies of avoiding war with Germany have been the subject of intense debate for more than seventy years among academics, politicians and diplomats. The historians' assessments have ranged from condemnation for allowing Adolf Hitler's Germany to grow too strong, to the judgment that they had no alternative and acted in Britain's best interests. At the time, these concessions were widely seen as positive, and the Munich Pact concluded on 30 September 1938 among Germany, Britain, France, and Italy prompted Chamberlain to announce that he had secured "peace for our time."…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mahatma Gandhi says, “Civil disobedience becomes a sacred duty when the state becomes lawless and corrupt.” Gandhi was an Indian nationalist leader that against British-rule in Indian and also led India to independence; in addition, he inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world. There was a question that everyone has been asking from wartime to recently: when is civil disobedience justified? There are a lot of civil disobedience movements around the world; everyone is willing to against his or her government; they are fighting for freedom and equal rights. In David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell, he expresses his opinion about “The Limits of Power” through section three in his book.…

    • 2027 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arthur Neville Chamberlain’s contentious decision to end appeasement and institute a wartime policy against Germany, was important for the protection of Great Britain and the social-stability of Europe as a whole. Chamberlain was a central figure in British politics during a tumultuous decade in European history. As Prime Minister, he addressed a series complex of problems that reached the rise of Nazi Germany. Chamberlain initially believed that he could reconcile with Hitler through his policy of appeasement, which was based on pragmatic intentions that would seek to prevent war and establish diplomatic relations in Europe. Chamberlain sought for Germany to remilitarize the Rhineland and unite the Germans as a means to appease Adolf Hitler…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that Civil Disobedience has been known and used for centuries .Civil disobedience was used by many famous people like Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. Gandhi used civil disobedience to go up against the british with nonviolent to get independence for India. Civil disobedience is the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest. Martin Luther King Jr. fought for civil rights and he led the civil right movement along with others, their protesten included sit ins and illegal marches which weaken the segregation in the south. Civil disobedience has been prove by many people on why it is important, such as the women's suffragist movement, which lasted from 1848 to 1920.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays