The English Bill of Rights is considered to be the foundation of the English Constitution, stating the monarch would serve as head of state and have a limited degree of authority, and Parliament would maintain the ultimate power. The Bill of Rights also guaranteed certain individual rights, however, it did not go as far as identifying individual rights as did its American successor, but instead it focused on the monarchy, the Parliament, and the relationship between the two. The Convention Parliament, were right in their actions to replace the cruel and arbitrary king James II, and to announce their rights, through the new Declaration of Rights, along with their new king. According to the contemporary writer of the day, John Locke, “if a government does not protect the natural rights of the people—defined specifically as life, liberty, and property—then the people have the right to rebel and replace the government with one that more effectively protects those
The English Bill of Rights is considered to be the foundation of the English Constitution, stating the monarch would serve as head of state and have a limited degree of authority, and Parliament would maintain the ultimate power. The Bill of Rights also guaranteed certain individual rights, however, it did not go as far as identifying individual rights as did its American successor, but instead it focused on the monarchy, the Parliament, and the relationship between the two. The Convention Parliament, were right in their actions to replace the cruel and arbitrary king James II, and to announce their rights, through the new Declaration of Rights, along with their new king. According to the contemporary writer of the day, John Locke, “if a government does not protect the natural rights of the people—defined specifically as life, liberty, and property—then the people have the right to rebel and replace the government with one that more effectively protects those