To start it off; not all recycling is bad. Recycling aluminum cans is actually beneficial. However, this paper concentrates on the worst type of recycling: paper recycling. Recycling paper is an activity that waste money, human and natural resources, and time. The recycling movement that has swept this nation started with the Mobro 4000 barge. It was filled with trash and needed to be dumped somewhere. There was no place for it to go so it sailed up and down the Atlantic coast. For doing so it received a lot of media-attention and people formed the idea; America was running out of landfill space to dump trash. In response to this, government worker Jay Winston Porter published “An Agenda for Action” which was read nationally. It said such things as “…recycling is vital”, “We’re running out of places to dispose our trash”, and “1/3 of the nations landfills will be full within the next few years.” Since “An Agenda for Action” was written the percentage of trash recycled jumped from 10% to 30%. Thanks to Mr. Jay Winston Porter, Americans started to waste their time and money. Landfill space is a huge point that is made by people who favor recycling. They seem to think that if we don’t recycle we will be buried under mountains of trash. Just like Mr. Porter said, “We’re running out of places to dispose our trash.” In actuality America has plenty of room. Americans throw away 220 million tons of trash a year. It sounds like a lot but America has space to put all that trash. Newspaper from a household in a year weighs about 520 pounds and only occupies 40 cubic feet in a landfill. If there was a 35-mile by 35-mile landfill that was 200 feet high, it could hold the trash of America for the next 1,000 years. That would be roughly .0003% of the United State’s total area. Landfill capacity has been increasing over the past years in most parts of the America and has only shrunk in a few areas such as New Jersey. Landfills also have to meet strict government regulations and standards. Even though there are strict standards, people who are in favor of recycling say that the decomposing materials are hazardous to people and that methane gasses can build up and explode. At the United State’s biggest landfill, Puente Hills Landfill, they harvest the methane gas for the decomposing organic materials. The gas is then used to provide electricity for 60,000 homes for the next 30 years. As for the smell, in some areas trash is buried and seeds are planted. The resulting area is turned into parks, golf courses, or other areas of recreation. According to the New York Department of Sanitation, 40% of their recycled items go to the landfill. The EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) estimates that there will be 5.7 cancer-related deaths due to landfills in the next 300 years. Also there has been advancements in packaging which helps lower the amount of food that is thrown in the trash. Packaging helps reduces the chances of food poisoning and other food related health problems along with keeping landfill size at a minimum. It wastes the consumers time sorting the materials and wastes money that the consumer is paying to have it taken away. There is a significant cost difference. In almost all communities in the United States it cost more to recycle then to landfill. It takes roughly 40-50 dollars to throw away a ton of trash in a landfill. It takes about 150 dollars to recycle a ton of trash. That would make the annual cost of recycling 8 billion dollars. Recycling is supposed to get a net profit. However, in New York City in the past 15 years there has been a net loss. The loss in 2004 was 33 million dollars. The true cost of recycling is hidden in the tax money that the government takes. They use tax money for things that someone would not normally spend money on. Since recycling paper is a manufacturing process it costs more money. First workers have to pulp the paper. Then moved to a screening facility. After that it goes through centrifuge cleaning and then a floatation process. When that is done it is moved to a place where kneading takes place and then it is washed. It’s then bleached, paper made, and then the waste is disposed. This whole process pollutes the air, takes gas, time, and money to move the materials to different centers to be treated. The chemicals at the different centers that are used to treat the paper are harmful for the environment. The paper that has been treated is of lesser quality then the original paper. Jobs are created because recycling is such a long multi-step process. Having more jobs will help raise the economy. This is true but the people who work in the recycling industry are doing a job that serves no purpose. It’s just like paying them to run around all day. The money used to pay the workers could be used to raise teacher salaries, provide health care for all Americans, or to help other social problems. A University of Michigan economist named Richard Porter says, “The fact that lots of people are needed to carry out recycling programs is basically evidence that recycling is expensive, requiring lots of labor (as well as capital) that could have been used to full fill other goals of public policy.” Saving the trees is easily the most popular reason of why people choose to recycle. The truth is, if Americans recycle it leads to fewer trees. It sounds crazy but it is true. Trees that are used to make paper are grown on tree farms around the world. If Americans kept using recycled paper then there would be no use for having tree farms. The result would be fewer trees, because there would be no use for the trees people plant at tree farms. Roy E. Cordato is one of the people who have researched this: If we stopped using paper, there would be fewer trees planted. In the paper industry, 87% of the trees used are planted to produce paper. For every 13 trees ”saved” by recycling, 87 will never get planted. It is because of the demand for paper that the number of trees has been increasing in this country for the last fifty years. The lesson is this: if your goal is to maximize the number of trees, don’t recycle.
Trees that are used for making paper aren’t trees that take years to mature before they can be used. Trees are a renewable resource which means that trees cut down can be replaced by new trees. “ The amount of new growth that occurs each year in forests is more than 20 times the number of trees consumed by the world each year for wood and paper (Benjamin 80). There are 3 times as many trees then there was in the year of 1920. One of the main reasons people want to save the trees is because they give off oxygen. This is true but with age a tree reaches a point where leaves and needles fall off the tree. The fallen leaves and needles start to decay and start to release carbon dioxide, which is the opposite of what environmentalist want. When a tree dies it goes from producing oxygen to producing carbon dioxide. Trees need to be cut down at this point. Another common myth is that the trees used to make paper are from the endangered rainforest. Actually this is not true. Trees used for paper are generally in the northern most forests of the world. What recycling amounts to in the end is that it is a feel good activity. If consumers were more informed they wouldn’t get so much satisfaction from recycling. The satisfaction is shown in research done by sociologist. They concluded that recycling makes a person feel good. The good feeling comes from thinking that they are helping the planet and it also gives a sense of community. Daniel Benjamin who is a professor at Clemson University says “The basis of why people recycle is on misinformation.” He is saying that if people knew the true waste of recycling, they wouldn’t do it. In conclusion, recycling is a waste of money, human and natural resources, and time. From the start with the Mobro 4000 and “An Agenda for Action by Jay Winston Porter, recycling has been a pointless waste of time. Environmentalist want Americans to think that there will be a shortage of landfill space when there really isn’t. They also want people to think that organic materials that decompose are hazardous to the health of Americans when it really isn’t. Also the cost of recycling is higher than if someone would just dump it in a landfill. The process of treating recycled paper is a long process that pollutes the air and costs a lot of money. Not recycling helps saves trees. More trees are planted to be harvest for paper. In the world there is 3 times as many trees as there was 88 years ago. However ultimately, recycling does accomplish one thing. It makes people feel good about themselves! Recycling is pointless, worthless, and makes people money-less. When this paper has served its purpose it is going into the trash…where it belongs.
Works Cited
Benjamin, Daniel, Garbage and Recycling.San Diego: Greenhaven Press inc. (2007).
“Rethink Recycling”. 20 Nov. 1995. Ehponline.com. 02 Mar. 2008 .
Paper Recycling is Bad for your Butt AND you World, 2 June, 2005, Lockjawslair.com. 02 Mar. 2008 .
“Recycling.” Bullshit. Showtime. April 29, 2004. Broadcasted onYoutube.com, Jan 15, 2008. .
Tierney, John: “Recycling…Is Garbage”. New York Times, 1996: 24-29, 44, 48, 51, 53. 02 March, 2008. .
Tierney, John. “Recycling is Uneconomical.” Is Recycling an Effective Response to Pollution? Eds. Tamara L. Roleff, San Diego: Greenhaven, 2000.
Cited: Benjamin, Daniel, Garbage and Recycling.San Diego: Greenhaven Press inc. (2007). “Rethink Recycling”. 20 Nov. 1995. Ehponline.com. 02 Mar. 2008 . Paper Recycling is Bad for your Butt AND you World, 2 June, 2005, Lockjawslair.com. 02 Mar. 2008 . “Recycling.” Bullshit. Showtime. April 29, 2004. Broadcasted onYoutube.com, Jan 15, 2008. . Tierney, John: “Recycling…Is Garbage”. New York Times, 1996: 24-29, 44, 48, 51, 53. 02 March, 2008. . Tierney, John. “Recycling is Uneconomical.” Is Recycling an Effective Response to Pollution? Eds. Tamara L. Roleff, San Diego: Greenhaven, 2000.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Doug Bandow in “Recycling is Wasteful” claims recycling does not help the environment and is too costly to fund. He gives evidence and reasoning to explain why recycling is more harmful than we think. The authors sub claims are: recycling creates more pollution, resources are not scarce, an easier way of handling garbage, and lastly, recycling costs too much money.…
- 512 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Recycling is an important way to keep our environment safe and clean for the children of the future. GOOD!!!…
- 620 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Recycling and waste prevention are two very important ways to help address the issues of the environment concerning climate change. Recycling is a very beneficial factor that more individuals need to exercise in order to improve the environment’s pollution, reduce emissions of greenhouse gases, and save energy and natural resources that are used to produce products from virgin materials rather than from recycled materials, which uses less energy and produces less harmful pollution. Recycling has many benefits that helps improve the earth’s conditions. Waste prevention and recycling are real ways to address these problems and begin to make a change. Recycling turns materials that would otherwise become waste into valuable resources, reducing the amount of natural resources needed to produce these same products. Collecting your used bottles, cans, and newspapers and taking them to a recycling bin or collection facility is just the first step, in a series of steps that generates a host of financial, environmental, and social returns. These benefits accrue locally as well as globally. Recycling protects and expands United States manufacturing jobs and increases United States competitiveness by creating more recycling jobs and facilities within the United States and producing more of our own products with recycled materials and being less dependent on outside countries and companies for these products. Recycling prevents pollution caused by the manufacturing of products from virgin materials.…
- 843 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Recycling is one clear response households have taken to combat this. But the issue is much more complex than the presumed problem of landfills and the feel good solution of separating your plastics from metals.…
- 1434 Words
- 6 Pages
Best Essays -
Furthermore, Pellow reinforces the concept that governmental policies can directly damage groups of people or a certain race by pointing out the ironic conditions that take place in recycling industries. Pellow states that “solid waste is a fact of life” (1). Humans as a species tend to aggregate, making the disposal of waste a complicated issue. Disposal practices lead to divided political opinions and negative environmental impacts, such as pollution. And, although all humans contribute to producing waste, not all humans share the burden of managing this garbage. For instance, Pellow observed the social and economic conditions taking place under a recycling center located within Chicago. The foundation behind the idea of recycling is to foster the concern for environmental respect. Therefore, a recycling center should be a place where people are aware of their actions and what the resulting consequences may be. However, many environmental problems and social inequalities arose within the community of Chicago.…
- 508 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Recycling isn't just a good for the environment, it's also a good for society. We can see these positive effects on society today. Recycled material comes at a lower cost than raw material taken from the…
- 1015 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Recycling has been a well known idea for so many years, but now we need it more than ever. Now in the world there are so many problems with the environment like Global Warming, toxic waste, and not to mention not recycling is very costly but recycling reduces the landfill space, helps conserves natural resources, and reduces the production of greenhouse gases . When you recycle you also help save animals so the rims of a six pack of soda doesn’t end up blocking a fish's gills or a plastic bag getting eaten by a turtle and having it choke on the bag. Recycling can also be a group effort where you get a group of people from your community, school, church, job, or just you and your friends so not only your saving the environment but your having fun with people you know while doing it.…
- 673 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
One reason everybody should recycle is animals are dying and starving. From garbage being everywhere. Acorrding to www.humanesocity.org they found birds poisined from lead weight. Also they found skunks with yogurt cups on their heads not being able to eat. Also pelicans had fishhooks in their stomachs. The worst that the have found was they found a raccoon with beer cans on its paws there was no fur, no skin, it's all flesh. Clearly almost everybody doesn't like to see animals suffer. That's why…
- 425 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
According to Should the U.S. Scrap the Recycling program, “It’s more expensive and takes more energy and water to recycle old paper than to cut down and process pine trees and then plant pine seedlings.” When going through the recycling process it can cost more money than actually making a new product. For example, most recycling centers are sorted by hand, causing for people to have to pay for constant salaries. Even if we switch to machines to save more money, it will still cost a great deal of money. Although this does create more trash, landfills might not be a huge problem in the future. As you can see there are some negatives to having the recycling program.…
- 783 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
EFFECTS OF GEOGRAPHICS AND RECYCLING Abstract Research was conducted to determine if recycling participation is affected based on where an individual lives and/or where they grew up. Many psychological and sociological studies have looked into the human behavior of recycling; what drives an individual to recycle and what are the key components to a successful recycling program. Results have shown that people with access to a structured recycling program have much higher levels of recycling than do people lacking such access. Furthermore, individual attitudes toward the environment affect recycling behavior only in the community with easy access to a structured recycling program.…
- 2604 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
In the article, “Recycling Is Not Garbage” environmentally Defense fund scientist Richard A. Denison and economic analyst John F. Ruston rebut a series of myths that they say have been promoted by industrial opponents in an effort to undermine the environmentally valuable and successful recycling movement. One of them is that recycling is not necessary because landfilling trash is environmentally safe. But this statement is simply wrong. “In fact, 250 out of 1,204 toxic waste sites on the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund National Priority List are former municipal solid waste landfills” (Denison 280). That means landfills are major sources of air and water pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions. Another myth is that recycling is not cost effective, and should pay for itself. As discussed in “Recycling Is Not Garbage” an analysis of nine years of detailed data collected by the Seattle Solid Waste Utility shows that, after a two year startup period, recycling services saved the city's solid waste management program $1.7 to $2.8 million per year (Denison 281). Thus, we do not expect landfills or incinerators to pay for themselves, nor should we expect this of recycling. No other form of waste disposal, or even waste collection, pays for itself. Waste management is simply a cost society must…
- 1076 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
C. Preview/Thesis - Today I’ll bring to the forefront the problem we face with trash buildup on our Earth, how recycling helps and what it does, and what we can do to help.…
- 696 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Recycling is a major part of our society. It is something that we as American citizens do daily without thinking twice about it. That is one of the main reasons I chose to write this paper on Recycling sustainability. The role of recycling to preserving our environment and to live in a sustainable way is a lot more important than many people think it is. One of the main reasons I chose to write this paper on recycling is because it is a major part of our everyday lives and it is something that most people and businesses do. As many people think they are helping by recycling, (do not get me wrong, it is a major help to our environment) they do not understand that it has major negative effects on the environment. Recycling is said to be the basis for sustainability. At…
- 3503 Words
- 15 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Recycling is detrimental because 30% of people do not pick up their trash it will just sit there to rot. In the article, “Recycling Worth the Trouble Cost?,” it states 1,000 years-worth of trash would only fill a 35-square mile landfill that is 100 yards deep. This proves that we do not fill up a lot of space with trash like we do not need a huge landfill. In the article, “Cons Of Recycling,” it states originally costs $28 to send a ton of waste to the landfill while it cost $147 to recycle the same amount. This shows that it is not cheap to recycle, nothing is free.…
- 480 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In the New York Times, John Tierney wrote an article called “Recycling is Garbage”. In that article, he declared that “Recycling may be the most wasteful activity in modern America: a waste of time and money, a waste of human and natural resources”. In the article, he points out many things. For instance, packaging saves resources, reducing food spoilage. Fast-food meals generate less trash per person than home-cooked meals. Also, the cheapest way to dispose of garbage is in a landfill.…
- 888 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays