Preview

Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
532 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted
Social media has become one of the most popular forms of communication applied in today’s society. Social websites, such as Facebook or Instagram, are being used as ways to communicate with one another, without one on one contact. Before social media, people could not simply communicate without personal contact or by actions, such as letters. In Malcolm Gladwell’s essay, “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” Gladwell argues that social websites will not bring effectiveness in revolutionary movements. He states, “The Internet lets us exploit the power of distant connections with marvelous efficiency… but weak ties seldom lead to high-risk activism.” (320) Activism has completely changed over the past few decades due to social networks. With the use of Facebook, Instagram, etc., social media has become a more common …show more content…
Social media has improved communication as a whole. People are now able to share any news they want to just about anyone, at the snap of their fingers. Within minutes of posting characters on social media, thousands of people become aware of the events taking place in a person’s life. That is, if the person shares every detail. There is also a negative outtake from social media. It is evident that social interaction is not as ordinary as it should be, or used to be. With social networks, people are unable to obtain the full effect of communicating with a person. Of course, social media users can read about what is happening in someone else’s life, but they lack the physical and emotional feeling that is obtained from being in front of the person. Due to the fact that people are significantly dependent on media nowadays, the enjoyment of in-person conversations is no longer familiar. It is unknown of whether or not this will continue to negatively or positively affect

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the reading, "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted", Gladwell discusses how armchair activism is inefficient in regards to challenging the status quo. Throughout the article Malcolm consistently explains the civil rights movement and what allowed for its success. He talks of the hierarchical command structure and how it organized people to bring about great change. It is the strong connections amongst protesters which establish a strong foundation necessary for grassroots activism. Using the Palestinian Liberation Organization, he demonstrates how a loosely constructed assembly can fall prey to outside manipulation.…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The central premise of both Malcolm Gladwell’s article “Small Change: Why The Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted.” and Zizi Papacharissi’s book Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics is to discuss the ways in which social media platforms such as Twitter can serve as communication tools that foster action for various causes. In his article, Gladwell notes that some scholars believe that the internet and social media platforms enable an upgraded and new model of activism due to the “ease” and speed” of mobilizing causes through such outlets (Gladwell, pp. 8-9). However, Gladwell rejects such a simple assertion and, instead, argues that although these platforms can help mobilize particular movements, they alone are not enough to maintain…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his piece, Small Change, Malcolm Gladwell documents the importance of the change in activism from the 1960s to present. Specifically how today, activism is seen electronically, as people use the media to write protests to the oppressor instead of how in the 1960s activism was seen in sit-ins. Overall, Gladwell asserts that social media is not the best way to start a movement as it does not motivate people as much as a sit-in does. I cannot help but side with Gladwell as he has a good point in saying that social media does not bring the same results as a sit-in. I, as a social media user that has participated in online protests such as signing petitions, can confirm Gladwell’s assertions as I can write a reason why things should be better,…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In “Small Change: Why the revolution will not be tweeted” Malcolm Gladwell argues that the new reinvented social activism is inferior to the activism used in the pre-internet age. Gladwell claims in the past people used ‘high-risk’ and strategic activism; qualities that activism nowadays don’t possess. I believe Gladwell undermines the power of the internet. Gladwell makes it seem as though only pre-internet activism could make impactful changes in the world. She claims the power of the internet is only used for insignificant purposes, such as finding someone’s phone.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm Gladwell wrote the article “Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted” to inform the world about networks such as Twitter or Facebook and their uses. Gladwell starts off by explaining how networks worked before these websites were created. He talks about how civil rights movements circulated through the country in a short period of time without the use of social networking. Then Gladwell explains the facts of why these social networks will not work in large networking situations.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the essay “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted” Gladwell argues that social media doesn’t have a great affect in big revolutionary movements, because it creates weak bonds between individuals and doesn’t have a formal structure of ranking. He refers back to…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Granovetter has observed that, “our acquaintances- not our friends- are out greatest source of new ideas and information. The internet lets us exploit the power of these kinds of distant connections with marvelous efficiency… but weak ties seldom lead to high risk activism”…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to the topic of social media, many will vilify Twitter and Facebook. This is true of authors Gladwell and Baron. Whereas Gladwell states that social media is not the adequate tool to organize social or political activism, Baron maintains that even without social media available, people will continue to fight for what they believe in. One way that each other tries to persuade the readers is through logos.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To support his convictions, Gladwell claims that weak ties and ambiguous equality introduced by social networking websites wouldn’t be enough to raise an effective protest, and tried throughout the text to convince the reader with his view toward effective revolutions and social media. His text is reliable and credible because of specific settings of events ‘They would all have remembered the murder of Emmett Till in 1955, the Montgomery bus boycott that same year, and the showdown in Little Rock in 1957.’(14) The 2011 Arab Spring rebellions made big use of social media activism within the countries of Tunisia, Libya and Egypt. These nations concentrated on the society’s ability to operate social media technologies and begin organizing essential foundation initiative for a globalized form of democracy. Arab youth population is described as budding societies using social media to blame out the repressive sides of the…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is commonly acknowledged that technology is drastically influencing our social behaviors, yet the depths of such influences are still unclear. Many scholars, especially Malcolm Gladwell, cast doubt on this aspect of the question. They believe the impact of technology is insufficient to cause political revolutions. However, I disagree with Gladwell’s opinion that social media cannot push forward revolution. Social media can actually help carry out political and social revolutions, because of the profound influences of technology on people’s behaviors and…

    • 82 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many are saying that social media is the new platform for large-scale change. Campaigns are turning towards social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, to gain support for their causes. Not only are companies and larger organizations using social networking sites (SNS) to promote change, but also everyday citizens are sharing their personal stories to motivate people to take action. But, is social media actually a strong platform for activism? Author Malcolm Gladwell, doesn’t think so. In Gladwell’s paper Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not be Tweeted, he argues that social media does not result in large-scale change. Instead of promoting change social media promotes participation (Gladwell, 2015). Many other writers agree,…

    • 1723 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the past generation, the younger current generation has difficulty forming “authentic relationships” due to the fact that technology is inhibiting their social skills. Each generation has a different view of technology because of the fact that the current generation grew up with technology, while the previous generation did not. In Malcolm Gladwell’s “Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted,” the author speaks of the fact that technology is beneficial, but he also sees how it is demolishing the current generation's ability to communicate as the older generation did. Because Gladwell had grown up without technology, he only sees the corruption of it. Like Gladwell, Sherry Turkle’s “Alone Together,” brings…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gladwell and Gopnik

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages

    With America’s history of people fighting for their rights, we have become accustomed to the idea that activism needs to be extreme; to cause riots, have aggression, and for people to be put in jail to make a point. We have created an image that there needs to be a fierce willingness to fight, in order for activism to be effective. As Malcolm Gladwell describes in “Why the Revolution Should not be Tweeted”, he reminds us of what ‘real’ activism is and how other generations have risked their lives to make a difference, in both their lives and the future of America. He does not think that activists can be considered true activists if they are non-violent when protesting for their rights. However, Gladwell should consider that protesting is a process that doesn’t start off as being violent and aggressive. The first stages of a successful protest involve acknowledging the problem. In the other text, “Bumping into Mr. Ravioli”, Adam Gopnik claims that technology pushes people apart because of a "busy-ness" affect that it creates. What he does not realize is that he used technology as a resource to help him become a more understanding father. After recognizing a problem with his daughter and her imaginary friend, he reaches out to his sister, a developmental psychologist, through phone calls and emails. While it does keep us too busy sometimes, social media has benefits to it. It is a tool that can be used to exchange information, teach its users, and continually raise awareness. Once our generation is able to realize the benefits of social media and use it to its advantage while minimizing its cons, it can prove to Gladwell that tweeting, or Facebook-ing isn’t useless. It is a tool that has the potential to bring activism to another level.…

    • 1872 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Malcolm Gladwell’s article "Small Change: Why the Revolution Will not be Tweeted" raises many questions about the potential contributions web-based social networking has attributed to the emergence of progressive social movement and change. "The revolution will not be tweeted" is reflective of his view that social media has no useful application in serious activism, which is a bold assertion, given the impact that social media has on today’s society. Gladwell believes that effective social movements powerful enough to impose change on longstanding societal forces will require both strong ties among all involved parties and the presence of the hierarchical organizations. In contrast, Gladwell characterizes the social networks as an interwoven…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Modern social technology is threatening to dominate our lives and make us less human. As media has developed, human frantically use modern technology to communicate with each other. Under the illusion of perfect connections between people, it indirectly isolates and leads to less socially comfortable human interaction. However, social media such as facebook, and twitter actually brings out various benefits by sharing commonality of human nature through convenient access of modern technology. In another perspective, the essential nature of social media and technology connects people more closer, not isolating from real community.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays