Zone remained the heart of the zone long after construction. The border between the Zone and Panama-proper appeared more akin to two opposing countries borders, rather than a separation of districts. This division between the Zone and Panama extended to the economic environment as well. With the Panama Canal behind the Zone’s borders the financial benefits of the canal were restricted. When the Canal began construction under the U.S. the Panamanian government expected boosts to the economy. The expected benefits of the Canal included new businesses for the citizens of Panama, new trading relations with foreign entities, taxes on shipments crossing the Panamanian border, and further foreign investments to maintain this critical infrastructure. These expectations never came to fruition. During the U.S. occupation of the Zone and the Canal, Panamanians were largely disregarded and did not receive any benefits from the canal. Statistics state that at most the average non-U.S. worker on the canal made up 7% of the force, and these jobs would largely go to West Indians rather than Panamanians. The U.S. prevented services from Panamanians reaching the ships as well; the Zone’s marines enforcing a law passed by the U.S. that banned the natives from offering transitioning vessels repairs, food, maintenance, or any entertainment. The local economy suffered further as the U.S. did all in its power to persuade sailors and Zonians …show more content…
in the early and mid-20th century. Panama and its people suffered greatly from discrimination, economic turmoil, and neglect during the United States’ occupation of their country through the Canal Zone. Despite this Panama, after they managed to obtain full rights to their land and the Canal itself, began a growth in economics, culture, and government that is continuing to this