Preview

Wikipedia-an Introduction

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
17731 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Wikipedia-an Introduction
Wikipedia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

|Wikipedia |
|[pic] |
|[pic] |
|The logo of Wikipedia, a globe featuring glyphs from several writing systems |
|[pic] |
|Screenshot of Wikipedia 's multilingual portal. |
|Web address |http://www.wikipedia.org |
|Slogan |The Free Encyclopedia that anyone can edit |
|Commercial? |No |
|Type of site |Internet encyclopedia |
|Registration |Optional, but is required for certain tasks|
| |such as editing protected pages, creating |
| |pages in English Wikipedia and uploading |
| |files |
|Availablelanguage(s) |276 active editions (286 in total) |
|Users |Over 77,000 active editors[1] |
|Content license |Creative Commons Attribution / |
| |Share-Alike 3.0 (most text also |
| |dual-licensed under GFDL) |
| |Media licensing varies |
|Owner |Wikimedia Foundation (non-profit) |
|Created by |Jimmy Wales, Larry Sanger[2] |
|Launched |January 15, 2001 |
|Alexa rank |[pic] 7 (June 2013)[3]



Citations: in Wikipedia". First Monday 12 (8). doi:10.5210/fm.v12i8.1997. Retrieved February 22, 2008. ▪ Pfeil, Ulrike; Panayiotis Zaphiris and Chee Siang Ang (2006). "Cultural Differences in Collaborative Authoring of Wikipedia". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (1): 88. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00316.x. Retrieved December 26, 2008. ▪ Reagle, Joseph (2007). "Do as I Do: Authorial Leadership in Wikipedia". WikiSym  '07: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis. Montreal, Canada: ACM. Retrieved December 26, 2008. ▪ Rosenzweig, Roy. Can History be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past. (Originally published in The Journal of American History 93.1 (June 2006): 117–46.) ▪ Wilkinson, Dennis M.; Bernardo A ▪ Aaron Halfaker, R. Stuart Geiger, Jonathan T. Morgan, John Riedl (2012). "The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration Community". American Behavioral Scientist 57 (5): 664.doi:10.1177/0002764212469365. Retrieved August 30, 2012. ▪ Ayers, Phoebe; Matthews, Charles; Yates, Ben (September 2008). How Wikipedia Works: And How You Can Be a Part of It. San Francisco: No Starch Press. ISBN 978-1-59327-176-3. ▪ Broughton, John (2008). Wikipedia – The Missing Manual. O 'Reilly Media. ISBN 0-596-51516-2. (See book review by Baker, as listed hereafter.) ▪ Broughton, John (2008). Wikipedia Reader 's Guide ▪ Dalby, Andrew (2009). The World and Wikipedia: How We are Editing Reality. Siduri. ISBN 978-0-9562052-0-9. ▪ Keen, Andrew (2007). The Cult of the Amateur. Doubleday/Currency. ISBN 978-0-385-52080-5. (Substantial criticisms of Wikipedia and other web 2.0 projects.) ▪ Listen to: ▪ Keen, Andrew (June 16, 2007). "Does the Internet Undermine Culture?". National Public Radio, USA. The NPR interview with A. Keen, Weekend Edition Saturday, June 16, 2007. ▪ Lih, Andrew (2009). The Wikipedia Revolution: How a Bunch of Nobodies Created the World 's Greatest Encyclopedia. New York: Hyperion. ISBN 978-1-4013-0371-6. ▪ O 'Sullivan, Dan (September 24, 2009). Wikipedia: a new community of practice?. Ashgate Publishing. ISBN 978-0-7546-7433-7. ▪ Reagle, Joseph Michael Jr. (2010). Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: the MIT Press. ISBN 978-0-262-01447-2. Book reviews and other articles ▪ Baker, Nicholson. "The Charms of Wikipedia". The New York Review of Books, March 20, 2008 ▪ Crovitz, L. Gordon. "Wikipedia 's Old-Fashioned Revolution: The online encyclopedia is fast becoming the best." (Originally published in Wall Street Journal online – April 6, 2009.) Learning resources See also: List of films about Wikipedia ▪ Balke, Jeff (2008-03). "For Music Fans: Wikipedia; MySpace". Houston Chronicle (blog) ▪ Dee, Jonathan (July 1, 2007). "All the News That 's Fit to Print Out". The New York Times Magazine. Retrieved February 22, 2008. ▪ Giles, Jim (September 20, 2007). "Wikipedia 2.0 – Now with Added Trust". New Scientist. Retrieved January 14, 2008. ▪ Miliard, Mike (December 2, 2007). "Wikipedia Rules". The Phoenix. Retrieved February 22, 2008. ▪ Poe, Marshall (2006-09). "The Hive". The Atlantic Monthly. Retrieved March 22, 2008. ▪ Rosenwald, Michael S. (October 23, 2009). "Gatekeeper of D.C. 's entry: Road to city 's Wikipedia page goes through a DuPont Circle bedroom". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 22, 2009. ▪ Runciman, David (May 28, 2009). "Like Boiling a Frog". London Review of Books. Retrieved June 3, 2009. ▪ Taylor, Chris (May 29, 2005). "It 's a Wiki, Wiki World". Time. Retrieved February 22, 2008.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Randall McClure’s essay “Googlepedia” assesses current students’ predominate approach to research-based writing, and uses realistic ways to push such approaches further. He does this by analyzing two of his students’ methods. Of the strategies his students use, perhaps the most effective is Edward’s use of Wikipedia as a leaping off point, before delving further and entering search terms into Google (230). This practice should be just the beginning of an in-depth research process. However, Edward’s successional use of search engines does provide a template for an ideal research process. In addition, although he does not go nearly in depth, he does include an assessment of the author’s credibility (229). More rigorous assessment could greatly…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author’s purpose is to testify about his experience with Wikipedia and persuade the intended audience that Wikipedia is not a credible or…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    |Wikipedia |Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is an online encyclopedia where that |It is not a validity source. The web site has no peer review and the information can |…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wikipedia's mission was to share the entire world’s information with everyone everywhere, anytime. A quotation of Jimmy Wales (the founder of Wikipedia) taken from his personal website said, "Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That’s what we’re doing" (2013). Because anyone can edit information on Wikipedia, many different fields of knowledge can become part of the encyclopedia; it is very useful for getting a quick review of information. "Wikipedia isn't a commercial website. It's a community creation" (Wales, 2009). I personally us Wikipedia as a…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    information. Wikipedia has proven to be too unreliable for a variety of reasons for it to be trusted…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ldr/531

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia is one of the most sought out information website. Jimmy Wales, founder says this about his website, “Wikipedia is something special…, it is a place we can all go to think, to learn and share our knowledge with others” (Wikipedia, 2012, p1). This resourceful tool has up-to-date news, press releases, and it provides its users with the convenience to various languages. In this paper team C will debate on supporting arguments for Wikipedia and opposing arguments if it is credible and a valid source of information.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Lau, writer of the essay, “The Limitations of Wikipedia”, is successful in persuading his readers that the webpage Wikipedia should not be used for college level research. In his essay, Philip states that, “Wikipedia can be a beneficial starting point in gaining general information on a subject but users should be wary of incorrect information”. The essayist’s use of examples, facts and quotes are what makes his argument so convincing.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Inf 103

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Wikipedia has been a successful source of information.Wikipedia does have a wealth of knowledge. I have used it a lot to find facts about different people, places, and books. It is a convenient way to look up information. It is a temporary solution to research. However when you are doing research Wikipedia is not a credible source nor is it recommended by professors. Anyone can post material on Wikipedia as stated in the disclaimer. So this information does not necessarily have to be the most accurate. This information could be old the facts may not…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jimmy wales

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Relevance: According to the research on citations of Wikipedia, Along with the increasing number of citations, another indicator that Wikipedia may be gaining respectability is its citation by well-known scholars. (Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 2008)…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rector, Lucy Holman. (2008). Comparison of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles, Reference Services Review, Vol. 36 Iss: 1, pp.7 - 22. Retrieved December 19, 2010, from the World Wide Web:…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In just three months, Wikipedia received 250 million fewer visitors compared to the same time last year. The officials of the free encyclopedia know about this, but they are not at…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dave Thomas was an All American philanthropist as well as a most successful business man. Thomas was the founder and CEO of Wendy 's Old Fashioned Hamburgers, which became popular for its square patties. He is also known for personally appearing in eight hundred television commercials for the chain from 1989 to 2002, more than any other person not just in the fast food industry but in television history (Newsweek 1). He created such an atmosphere in these ads that much of the public began to believed he was a professional actor. Starting what would be his long business venture at only fifteen, Dave Thomas would change the face of America (Wikipedia 1).…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since navigating the web can be difficult in obtaining information Wikipedia should be viewed as a primary source of initial, credible and valid information. In academia credible information, “often means library-mediated proprietary sources such as scholarly monographs, reference books, and peer-reviewed journals” (Information Today, 2010, pg. 40). The problem with this fundamental academic definition is in self limiting resource web sites to the research student.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was interesting to learn their findings in which they found “eight serious errors” in which four came for Wikipedia and four came from Britannica. They also found 162 factual and misleading errors in Wikipedia while only finding 123 in Britannica. Articles chosen for the study varied in subject and were review by field experts; they were not told who wrote the articles. Wales founder of Wikipedia was asked what he thought of these findings and he was pleased with the findings and stated that the “error rate for each encyclopedia was not insignificant, and added that he thinks such numbers demonstrate that broad review of encyclopedia articles is needed” (Terdiman, 2005). The importance of this article was to show that even in a controlled setting there is room for error.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, just because it has a lot of information doesn’t mean that it is all good information. Academic writing is a very accurate type of writing that can require many unbiased, reliable, credible, and relevant sources. I do not think all Wikipedia articles are held to these standards and so, I do not believe Wikipedia is an acceptable source for academic writing. Wikipedia is largely supposed to be an unbiased source by their own standards. However, not all articles are monitored enough to keep people’s biases from sticking through their writing.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics