Preview

William III's Invasion Essay

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
461 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William III's Invasion Essay
The leader of the invasion would be William III. He had to prepare the invasion very carefully, because it was a profound event. Three point were very important, in order to succeed, according to William: help of the English, gathering a vast army in the United Provinces, the help of the Holy Roman empire. Firstly, the help of the English was very important, because the army of Charles would have been, without any help, too big. William had circa 16.000 soldiers, but Charles could easily put 25.000 against William’s army. Although the Dutch were better trained and equipped, it would have been impossible to defeat Charles. So, William needed the support of the nation and moreover the support of English army, that is decent amount of the army …show more content…
William had a lot of power in the United Provinces: he was the Stadtholder, but he needed the support of the regents. After some events in the favour of William, the opposition supported William. It was not that difficult to persuade the people for an invasion of England, because of some ‘help’ of France. The Edict of Nantes (1685) made the people angry against France, a religious motive and Louis started the tariff war, very striking for a trading nation like the United Provinces. Since James was a known enmemy of the United Provinces and an enemy of the Protestant faith, Charles was a dangerous person for the Untied Provinces. Completely, when James joins forces with Catholic France against the Protestant United Provinces. The opposition agreed with William to start a preventive war against England, to turn away the danger if succeeded. On paper, it would have looked like a war between England and the United Provinces, so William made sure that the invasion would be his private mission. It was very important that everyone knew it was his private mission, because no English men would follow William, if the war was between the nations. So he acted as the Prince of Orange and not as the Stadtholder, because with that title he would

His army for the invasion was huge: 48 warships, 250 cargo ships, 60 fisher ships and circa 35.000 men. Half of the 35.000 consisted of soldiers. To coordinate these vast amount of troop, you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    | |They were well trained to fight. 400 British ships were stationed in harbor. |…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1016, Cnut of Denmark invaded England. He eradicated all opposition in a pogrom in Winter 1017, and ruled thereafter with a combination of Danes and newly promoted English Earls who profited from the Danish Conquest. Edward (the Confessor) fled to his father-in-law in Normandy. He finally regained the throne in 1042.…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franco-Dutch War Analysis

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From infancy, William III took the place of his deceased father as the head of the house of Orange and was raised to be the Dutch ruler. He married Mary, the daughter of the Duke of York, in the hopes of fostering cooperation between England and the Netherlands against an aggressive France. Louis XIV and William III were each other’s lifelong enemies…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    His childhood left a mark on Charles's behaviour as king. Like James he was a believer in the divine right of kings. Unlike James, he was absolutist and tried to put it into practice. Given his belief in divine right, he saw all parliaments privileges as being subject to the approval of the monarch, not as liberties that had existed without the judgement of the monarch. Also unlike James He saw all criticism and anyone who questioned him as disloyal. An example of these in combination is when Charles I dissolved parliament because he was being criticized by Parliament as he felt he didn't need them as long as he could avoid war. This began the 11 year period known as the Personal Rule where he ran the country through royal prerogative instead of in cooperation with parliament.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. William increased the royal power in England by Granting fiefs to the church and barons, keeping large amounts of land for himself, monitoring who and where castles were built, and requiring every vassal to swear first allegiance to him.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Charles 1 A Crisis

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A move that created further division between the court and the country, as the infamous figure that could make structural changes in the country, due to his relations with the King. A consequence that demonstrates narcissistic behaviour to ensure that he succeeds with his agenda. It is arguably thought that his agenda was to have full control over England and Scotland. Charles–more so than his father–acted on the “evil” advice of George and dismissed members of court. For example, “Lord Keeper Williams, who James protected”, a ‘known enemy of George’, dismissed by Charles as George was able to convince him to do so.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Philmas War Analysis

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the article, Philip Ranlet analyzes the possible causes that led to King Philip’s War to deconstruct the misleading interpretations often made by historians about the crucial event. Ranlet’s “Another Look at the Causes of King Philip’s War” contributes to the New Left historiographical discussion because the historians demand the inclusion of those features of our history that explains how we came to be a violent, racist, repressive society. The interpretation of some historians are often influenced by the time period the event is being analyzed. For example, nineteenteenth century historian, John Gorham Palfrey, referred to King Philip as “ ‘an unreasoning and cruel barbarian’ who had no cause to war against the Puritan settlers.”(Ranlet…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William was able to employ many different forms of the existing Anglo-Saxon English government and use them differently to his advantage. William was able to utilize the predominantly Norman royal household (remaining from Edward the Confessor’s reign), which was already the centre of government and develop this further by rewarding any Normans who had advised or helped during his conquest of England, therefore increasing the number of people from Norman origin in his court. By doing this William was able to surround himself with trusted advisors. This itself was not a complete turnaround as there had already been a strong influence of Norman culture in the royal household of Edward the confessor, who himself had been born in Normandy.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles I had a very bad start as king, he held all the blame at this point, because of his bad start people didn’t trust him much and he also had a stammer and was shy so people thought it would be more likely for him to let a war happen. Charles needed a stronger personality to be able to rule, people disliked Charles even more when he made the Duke of Buckingham chief minister as he was very unpopular and selfish. Things didn’t get any better when Charles married a catholic wife with a strong personality. People feared that as England was protestant, and Charles married a catholic wife, because of her strong personality she might make England catholic. Parliament was partly to blame for the earlier tension as they tried to refuse customs taxes to Charles.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    His army was so well disciplined and employed communication techniques on the battlefield that it is said that the army well over 100,000 men at the end of his campaign could perform complicated battlefield maneuvers in battle very easily. These maneuvers could be likened to the closing of a hand, that some would retreat, flank, and the attack again, all of this in the middle of a battle. Another thing that helped win the day was the use of the composite bow, a bow almost half the size of the English Longbow that could be employed from horseback with deadly precision.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry Iv Essay

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Henry IV Part II William Shakespeare uses diction, syntax, and imagery to convey King Henry’s state of mind.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    St. William of York Essay

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    William FitzHerbert, an English priest and Archbishop, was born in York, Yorkshire in the late eleventh century. Sometime in his late twenties, William was selected to be the treasurer of York, and shortly after, he was appointed to become to archdeacon of Yorkshire. Two elections took place before William was elected the archbishop; the first elected archbishop was eliminated because one of his followers bribed an official to guarantee the candidate would win. William was elected the archbishop of York in January 1141, but after many Bishops refused to consecrate him, a new election was demanded and after fourteen long years, William became the Archbishop of York in 1154. He unfortunately died within two months of his election on June 8th, 1954, Scholars believe he died because the chalice at mass was poisoned by one of the archdeacons of York, but this was never proved. Saint William of York proves to be an admirable saint because of his long-lasting perseverance throughout his disastrous lifetime and his enigmatic death.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why he got involved with William was because the borders between England and Wales were an issue. The borders between the two countries kept shifting which led to disputes between the Welsh and the English over the land. This would have created tension and William would have had to intervene. This is why he built castles along the border so he could establish the line between his country and Wales. Also, why he wanted this line to be established was because Wales was having a power struggle itself. Because there were multiple princes in Wales there were many disputes going on and William did not want this ‘spilling over’ into his country.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Glorious Revolution was a bloodless change of the throne in England. The English people and Parliament were growing tired of James II because he was Catholic, but were willing to tolerate him because they were expecting his Protestant daughter, Mary and her husband, William of Orange, to succeed James to the throne. When they received the news of James’ son being born, it broke their hope. Parliament was not going to risk another Catholic dynasty, so they invited William and Mary to the throne. When William arrived in England,…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays