Thus James states that the practice of Christianity views the unseen is a spiritual level of practice. As the christian religion is monotheistic (the belief in one God) they adopted the Logos as well in the view of Jesus Christ the reincarnation as the Son of God, they are similar to logos from the Stoic’s practice however it is quit different and a major difference is that they believe that you must emotionally be and presently involved in the practice. Whereas in the Stoic practice you can be mindful and have a pantheistic force that connects you with Logos. Then there is the Stoic views on the unseen which is more a mental mind game, it is still considered the “unseen”, Stoics is more of a mental practice its a Greek origin in which Logos to them is a practice of connecting with a aristocratic roman, rather than creating a distant spiritual …show more content…
James concludes on pages 72-74 that the practice of Stoic’s is much more shallow than the Christian religion, due there way of practices are less premature as he states. However I do not agree with him although the Christian religion has been practice a lot more that Stoics through the years stoics has much more a simple yet has much passion through its practice you must not say that just because the practice of the religion has less logos its losing its meaning and deep thought of religion, the practice of Stoics has much more consciouiouaness than the Christian religion because it has more emotional input going into the practice were as the reality of Stoics is simply a mental level. Both Christianity and Stoics religions have set differences and similarities that may or may not standout to others but they simply have the same differences. They both have the idea of the “unseen” in there own views yet similar views, both spiritual and mental states of