Preview

William The Conqueror Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1009 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William The Conqueror Research Paper
By what methods and with what results did William the Conqueror establish Norman rule in England from 1066-1087 ?

William was confronted by problems that no previous ruler had to face. The kingdom of England and William’s posseisions in Northern France were seperated by a wide expase of sea. William had to work hard to establish order in all his lands and by 1086 this was largely achieved. The Normans used many means to esatblish their kingdom in 1066. Many of these techniques included crushing the opposition. The Normans used various different techniques to establish their kingdom, of which many were quite succesful.

The First technique that the Normans used to establish their rule in England from 1066 to 1087 was Terror and Violence.
…show more content…
The Normans believed that the Castles would demorilise the population without physical harming them. These Castles and Fortifications were built as a Norman sign of Power in England. The site of these castles was supposed to intimidate the population and show them who is dominant. By the end of 1087, all centres of Importance had a castle close by. Using castles had been used previously. Prior to the Battle of Hastings, William had built a castle at Pevensey were the Norman army had landed and 7 miles inward in Hastings. Both of the castles had orginally been motte and bailey castles. These consisted of a wooden keep on top of an earthmound that was the so-called motte. The motte was surronded by the bailey which was the area around the wooden keep, and where the outside palisades would have been.
A different measure that was used to establish Norman rule in England was the construction of Cathedrals and the replacement of Anglo Saxon bishops with Norman ones. The large cathedrals served the same purpose as the Castles and Fortifications. They were built to intimidate the population. The Cathedrals were built on a colosal scale, the local population would be under no illusions to who had the control. Architecture on this scale was the best way to projert power. Religion played such an important role in the life of the people that Norman rule was completely solicified by changing the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    An earth embankment was built across the harbour mouth to protect the ships from the weather, and a castle was constructed at the top of the hill. The remnants of these may still be seen today. Then the Normans pillaged and burned the surrounding area, in order to force Harold to come south and defend his…

    • 9305 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The key of the development of centralized kingdoms was that the kings extended their power in more effective ways. During the High Middle Age, the kings started to had more source of power than the Lords, and the Kings used governmental institutions, marriage and alliance to extend their power. Some examples of centralized kingdoms are England, France and Spain. England started to emerge as a Kingdom in 1066 when William of Normandy arrived to the coasts of England. King Henry II had success in strengthening the power of the royal court. The royal courts stated to expand in all the territory and the local law codes were replaced for the common law. The English parliament merged as a representative government institutions. The house of Lords was formed by the…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Normans were French-speaking, and as a result of their rule, they introduced many French words that started in the nobility and eventually became part of the English language itself. As Paul K. Davis writes, "William's victory placed a foreign ruler on the throne of England, introducing European rather than Scandinavian society onto the isolated island" in "the last successful invasion of England." Paul K. Davis, 100 Decisive Battles from Ancient Times to the Present: The World's Major Battles and How They Shaped History (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), 113.…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    William’s archers went first their aim was not great as they were shooting uphill consequently hitting the shield wall and soaring over their heads. Next William sent in his cavalry (men on horses) to attack but because there was a shield wall the hoses could not get past therefore the Normans were safe.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. William increased the royal power in England by Granting fiefs to the church and barons, keeping large amounts of land for himself, monitoring who and where castles were built, and requiring every vassal to swear first allegiance to him.…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first argument as to why William won the battle of Hastings, is that he had the bet army. The Normans had 7500 men, all fully trained compared to the 4500 village workers and only 500 professionally trained soldiers that made up Harold’s army. Also, William had many archers that could kill from 100 meters way. The Normans were also equipped with blacksmiths, carpenters, medics and cooks as well as a few mercenaries, who were professional soldiers that fought for whoever paid them the most amount of money, on his side. Williams’s men also had better weapons and armour, for example: the cavalry were all equipped with mail hauberk, there is some evidence some of the archers used crossbows in addition to bows and arrows, some battle maces were also used along with spears and swords, round and kite shaped shields mean that the Normans were more protected from the English. Another benefit that William had was his great leadership skills.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was a battle between William of Normandy and Harold Godwinson, it was a fight for the throne after Edward the Confessor died, leaving no heirs to the throne. In 1066, Harold Hardrada, William of Normandy and Harold Godwinson had all claimed that they were the next king so the battle began. Once Harold Hardrada had lost at The Battle of Stamford Bridge, William and Harold were left for the throne. This was when the Battle of Hastings took place, William had won. Luck was not the only reason William had won, it was because he had strengths and Harold had many weaknesses.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Duke of Normandy was born around 1028. He was the victor at the battle of Hastings and was known to be William the Bastard and William the conqueror by his enemies. William became the king of England in 1066, December 25. When he was about 9 years of age, he inherited power on his father’s death and faced many challenges. He ruled England until his death, which was in 1087.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hastings is possible one of the most important battle in English history and as a result has generated much discussion as to why William was able to win. The answer is not simple as not all the facts were true but also because you must take on a whole different range of factors to find out just why and how William won the battle. There are many reasons for William’s victory but major reasons were William’s skill as a military leader and his ability to be well prepared for the battle. William persuaded many powerful French nobles to join him by promising them land in England, this helped by letting William gain men for his army and the nobles would give him good financial aid.…

    • 1257 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    William spent most of 1067 in Normandy, returning to England in December to continue the sublimation of his kingdom. He besieged Exeter, joined Gloucester and Bristol. In 1068 he secured Warwick, Nottingham, and York, when he swerved south to occupy Lincoln, Huntingdon, and Cambridge. When Danish raiders and hostile Yorkshiremen tried to destroy the Norman Establishment north of the Humber in 1069, his’’ Harrying of the North” was swift and terrible.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For William the Conqueror, success was a way of life. During his reign as king of England, William conquered three locations. The first was in Pevensey in the South of England, after, he went toward Hastings and Fought at Senlac Hill, lastly he took England. William the Conqueror was one of the most influential men in history.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1066: The Year of the Conquest, written by David Howarth, tells of one of the most important dates in the history of England. In 1066, William the Conqueror and William of Orange fought the historical Battle of Hastings. The outcome of this battle lead to many changes to the English people. The Norman people became assimilated into the English way of life. Howarth proceeds to tell the tale of the Battle of Hastings through the eyes on a common Englishman.…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although William the Conqueror had defeated Harold at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, an even bigger challenge had presented itself. William was now outnumbered in a land he had very little knowledge of, and would face several rebellions in the first decade of his reign. William was aware of this challenge, building castles in towns which presented any threat as a symbol of his power. Despite these measures, it would take William almost a decade, until 1075 to gain full control of England, which he did so due to several different factors, including his new motte and bailey castles, the weakness of English rebels and his own leadership in the face of rebellion. Upon landing in England, one of William’s first actions was to set up a readymade motte and bailey castle at Hastings.…

    • 1369 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    outline

    • 833 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. King Saxon Henry I and rebuilt royal power, leaving his successor King Otto I in a great territorial position…

    • 833 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this span of forty years, Normandy individualized itself from the Franks. His focus on the political structure and its role in legitimizing Normand power proved successful. In the latter part of 960’s, Richard changed the ideological strategy of the court to appeal to incoming warriors which reinvented the Duchy of Normandy. The failures of his predecessors provided Richard I with the knowledge to solidify his families rule. The model of political structure Rollo and William Longsword made their courts less unified with more individually concerned earls. By promoting a sense of Norman identity, it would help provide a chance for…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays