Workers Vs Industrialists Court Case
The Workers vs Industrialists Court Case What were the strong and weak points of each side? Major arguments from the defense is that they were creating jobs for the poor, that they were being fed and living in a house. That is big evidence because it's true they gave the poor a huge house to live in and they didn’t leave them starving like they used to be they were fed. Major arguments from the prosecution is That they were not working a normal life, yeah they were given a house and food and a paying job but the hours they worked was not ok. The people worked so much that they couldn’t live the life they wanted to because they were too tired from the hard work. Not only that but many people were injured, their hands were cut off or
…show more content…
Evidence is important because if your evidence is valid enough you can win the argument.
7. What, in your opinion, was the strongest argument and evidence and why?
In my opinion I believe that the evidence from the witness is the strongest argument because they told hand on experiences and experiences that they went through themselves. From no breaks to injuries. From no talking to no school. And there were so many bad injuries and death that was talked about by the witnesses.
Who was the most believable witness? Why?
I believe that Patty is the most believable witness because he went through multiple bad situations. He became disabled from working and now his wife has to work. He explained that men and children would have terrible injuries like lost hands and lost limbs because of the steel mill. But I also believe that Emma Woodhouse is a very believable witness because she was a child worker and described it as hell. She explained that there was no singing no talking no breaks nothing. They couldn’t go to school, her brother suffered from scoliosis and needs a cane to walk. Many children was also either injured or killed. Charles Russell even made a couple key points saying that the living conditions were poor working 12 hours straight no breaks with the bosses treating them like
Evidence is important because if your evidence is valid enough you can win the argument.
7. What, in your opinion, was the strongest argument and evidence and why?
In my opinion I believe that the evidence from the witness is the strongest argument because they told hand on experiences and experiences that they went through themselves. From no breaks to injuries. From no talking to no school. And there were so many bad injuries and death that was talked about by the witnesses.
Who was the most believable witness? Why?
I believe that Patty is the most believable witness because he went through multiple bad situations. He became disabled from working and now his wife has to work. He explained that men and children would have terrible injuries like lost hands and lost limbs because of the steel mill. But I also believe that Emma Woodhouse is a very believable witness because she was a child worker and described it as hell. She explained that there was no singing no talking no breaks nothing. They couldn’t go to school, her brother suffered from scoliosis and needs a cane to walk. Many children was also either injured or killed. Charles Russell even made a couple key points saying that the living conditions were poor working 12 hours straight no breaks with the bosses treating them like