Preview

Working in Groups

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
656 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Working in Groups
According to Champoux (2011), a group is a set of individuals interdependently working towards a common goal. Hellriegel & Slocum (2011) further added that a group must be small enough for individual to communicate person to person with other members. Decision making is one routine task a group has to undertake. According to Nelson et al. (2012), members in a group can influence and encourage one another, share their knowledge and expertise, which will produce better decision. However, Champoux, (2011) argue that group may require more time to complete the task due to time taken to ‘settle down’ by members.
Forming is one of the 5 stages of group development where members self-introduce and discuss on how to work on the task given (Champoux, 2011). As all of our group members are holding a full-time job, there is little communication or interaction between members. As mention by Champoux (2011), social interaction is one of the factors that affect cohesive group formation. Coming from a different background and unfamiliar with each other characteristics, members are courteous towards one another and are not projective in their feelings and thoughts (Hellriegel & Slocum, 2011). Similarities may help in group cohesiveness as people get along with others that have similar experience. An example of this can been seen in informal group. Informal group are formed by self interest and usually members have similar values (Mcshane, Olekalns, Travaglione, 2011). Diversity increases ambiguity complexity and miscommunication (Langton, Robbins, 2006). As a result, our group took a longer time in defining our task and goal.
However, (Mcshane, Olekalns, Travaglione, 2011) argue that diversity of members produce different insights to situations and thus produce better solutions. Through mutual understanding, cohesion group can still be form. Trust is referred as ‘positive expectations one person has toward another person or group in situation involving risk’ (Mcshane,



References: Langton, N. & Robbins, S. P., 2006. Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, Applications. 4th Canadian edition, Pearson Education. Nelson, D. L., Quick, J. C., Wright, S. & Adams, C., 2012. ORGB: Asia Pacific Edition. 1st edition. , Cengage Learning, South Melbourne Shore, Z., 2008, Blunder: Why Smart People Make Bad Decision, Bloomsbury USA, USA Hellriegel, D. & Slocum Jr., J. W., 2011. Organizational Behavior. 13th edition, South-Western Cengage Learning, USA McShane, S. Olekalns, M. and Travaglione, T. 2010, Organisational Behaviour on the Pacific Rim, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, Sydney Champoux, J.E. 2011, Organizational Behavior : Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations, 4th edition., Routledge, New York Bartol, K., Tein, M., Mattews, G., Sharma, B., 2008, Management: A Pacific Rim Focus, 5th edition, McGraw-Hill Australia Pty Ltd, Australia

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Bsop 598

    • 5468 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Schermerhorn, J., Osborn, R., Hunt, J., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2011). Organizational Behavior (Vol. 12). New York: John Wiley & Sons.…

    • 5468 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Denny 's Restaurant Corporation is one of the largest full-service family restaurant chains in the United States. And it operates over 2,500 restaurants around the world. Denny 's is known for its 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and 365 days a year operations, serving breakfast, lunch, dinner, and dessert around the clock.…

    • 4553 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Question 3 in this outcome asks about group cohesion. Below is some information on what that means, and the importance of it in forming groups:…

    • 1703 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ford Pinto Case

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Hellriegel, D., John, W. Slocum, Jr. "Organizational Behavior". 10th edition. OH: Southwestern College Publishing Company, 2004.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Synergetic Solutions

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * The external forces of change for Synergetic Solutions include technology, economic shocks, and competition. Technology is the one force that has caused for companies in the technology business to stay innovated and have skills be up to date with the needs of customers. Synergetic Solutions made the attempt to rely on a type of business that would promote slow and steady change and for employees to sustain their skills for a long period of time. Technology is not slow and steady and companies are govern by the change of technology. The economic shocks of generating higher revenue by converting to a business form systems integrating to network solutions is based on the combination of external and internal change. Economic shocks are what allow companies to set goals toward generating more revenue. In the internal force of economic shocks, it came as a decision and a vision created by Synergetic Solutions’ CEO. That vision toward being able to change the priority of the business and focused on the using the most influential people in his company by training the brightest four engineers toward learning toward the networking solutions business. The growth of the company for business was at stake because of how the product of systems integrating is basically offered by employees who have minimal computer skills and basic troubleshooting skills. Clearly the other idea internal change came from the change agents of the CEO and the four engineers. The final external force of change came with competition. Competition was not even embedded in the organization’s culture because of the products and services that it provided. Now that Synergetic Solutions was beginning in the network solutions business, they had to declare that they…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2008). Organizational Behavior (13 ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Pentice-Hall.…

    • 1918 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational Behavior (14th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 176-199.…

    • 1899 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Groups, like individuals are each unique with their own experiences and expectations. However many commentators studying group development and dynamics have…

    • 13259 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group cohesion is influenced by several factors. Having strong and confident leadership can guide the team to finding their common goal, and to work together. Also to aid and handle any conflicts that arise among the team. The way that the team develops is crucial to formation of strong cohesion, the linear model of cohesion shows how a team comes together to achieve their goal and create a positive team atmosphere. Personal factors can further or disrupt with group cohesion. Having attributes which could create divides among the team can lead to obstacles, limiting the togetherness of the team. Sharing personal attributes with teammates can make the team come together, feeling the support of your teammates will guide you to perform for them and…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hellriegel, Don, Slocum, John W. & Woodman, Richard W.; Organizational Behavior, South-Western Thomson Learney, 2001, pp 671.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Groups are made u of individuals with varying personalities, backgrounds and ideas. For a group to work well a bond needs to be developed. Every group needs a leader and each member should feel a sense of belonging, a reason and purpose for their presence in the group. Each and every group experience will have a different lesson that can be learned whether good or bad.…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mcshane, S.L, Von Glinow, M.A. & Sharma, R.R. (2006). Organizational Behavior (3rd ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.…

    • 1713 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personality Assessment

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational Behavior (15th ed.). : Prentice Hall.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    UNIT 5 COMPLETE Q4

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page

    Cross-functional teams provide an organization with some significant advantages. Creativity is greatly increased with the composition of this type of team. There is also more effective problem-solving with the diversity, experience and expertise of a cross-functional team (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). Group cohesiveness can be thought of as the glue that holds the group together. There are two types of cohesiveness that bind groups of individuals together; Socio-emotional and instrumental. Socio-emotional cohesiveness is a sense of togetherness that develops when individuals derive emotional satisfaction from group participation. This type of cohesiveness is effective and rewarding in many circumstances.…

    • 309 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Groups are often called upon within organizations when important decisions need to be made. This happens mostly when members of the group are different with respect to the information and the expertise they can provide. Groups more than likely will perform than individuals in terms of the quality of the decisions they make (Homan, van Knippenbert, Van Keef & De Dreu, 2007).…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays