Preview

Understand theories of teams and team working

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1703 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Understand theories of teams and team working
Outcome 1: Understand theories of teams and team working
The question asks you about ‘models of team work’. What it means by this is to research, and explain theory’s around teamwork. The best know theory around teamwork is by a man called Bruce Tuckman.
Below is an overview of his theory:

The 4 Phases of Tuckman’s Teamwork Theory

It was first published in 1965, and what made it different form all other theories was that Tuckman believed that groups don’t star off “fully formed and functioning”. He believed that that groups changed and evolved through clearly defined stages.

These four stages are:
Forming
Storming
Norming
Performing
Forming:
The initial stage of team development during which individuals have not yet gelled together. Everybody is busy finding their place in the team, sizing each other up, and asking themselves why they are here
Storming:
People begin to see themselves as part of a team. However at this stage they may challenge each other, and the team leader, about such things as what the team is doing, and how things should be done. As the stage title suggests, conflict and confrontation typify this stage, as differences surface. This may result in some loss of performance or focus on the task, as the diagram illustrates.
Norming:
This is the phase where team members start to come together, developing processes, establishing ground rules, clarifying who does what, and how things will be done. This phase is characterised by a growing sense of “togetherness”.
Performing:
This is the final stage where increased focus on both the task, and on team relationships, combine to provide synergy. Performance is delivered through people working effectively together.
Question 3 in this outcome asks about group cohesion. Below is some information on what that means, and the importance of it in forming groups:
Group cohesion is a phenomenon that determines how well a group holds together. When cohesion is strong, a group will remain stable, but

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Stage 1 is known as forming. The behaviour of each individual is driven by a desire to be accepted by the other group members. Conflict and controversial topics are avoided and team members focus on tasks at hand. Individuals are also gathering information and impressions about eachother. Although this is a comfortable stage to be in, the avoidance of conflict means not a lot of work gets done.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 591

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First, here is a summary of the development stages of a team. In the forming stage, team members come togetherand form initial impressions. They socialize in order to get to know each other and bond with other team members. In the storming stage, team members experience hostility and infighting over tasks and how the team works. In the norming stage, team members start to come together and realize what needs to be accomplished. In the performing stage, team members are well-organized and well-functioningand maintain a positive balance. In the adjourning stage, team members achieve closure when the project is accomplished.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The first stage is Forming, this stage is important because the team members get to know each other and become friendly. At first team members tend to behave independently and although goodwill may exist they do not know each other well enough to unconditionally trust one another.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bruce Tuckman has a theory which contains of four stages; these are forming, storming, norming and performing. His theory is about group development. The first stage is forming, this is when a group is reliant on one particular leader, if the leader is not there and someone else tries to take charge then the confusion starts. The leader makes sure every individual is aware of their role, if the leader does not make them aware, then their roles and responsibilities are unclear. For example in a class room everyone will be speaking to each other, when the teacher comes in and tells everyone to settle down then they will do so. The second stage is storming, at this stage everyone hasn’t settled into a task, they are all busy chatting amongst their selves and deciding who should be in charge. Decisions don’t come easily within a group it takes some time to come to an agreement. You start to form your own cliques and groups. People in the group may challenge each other in order to come out on top. Being focused it top priority for every individual, concentrating on achieving their goals and not being distracted by relationships and emotional issues, to enable progress to be made you may have to compromise within the group members. The third stage is Norming, this is when all members of the group have come to agreement on their roles and have accepted their individual responsibilities. Big decisions are made amongst group agreement were as minor decisions may be given to individuals or small groups within the whole group. Within the group commitment is getting stronger and unity is made everyone has a clear picture of what is happening. Now all the problems are over fun and social activates can now take place within the group and the leader has now earned every members respect and trust. The last stage is performing, the team is more strategically aware; the team members know what they are doing and why they are doing so,…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ba420: Mid-Term

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Group cohesion is influenced by a number of factors, most notably time, size, the prestige of the team, external pressure, and internal competition. Group cohesion usually evolves gradually throughout development. The more time the group spends together, the more cohesive it will be. Smaller groups—those of five or seven members, for example—tend to be more cohesive than those of more than twenty-five, although cohesion does not decline much with size after forty or more members. Prestige or social status may also enhance a group’s cohesion. For example, the more prestigious groups, Navy Blue Angels, are highly cohesive.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4 MAT Review Wheelan

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wheelan (2013) identifies the four stages of team development and provides detailed explanation of how a group transforms itself from a stage one group of uncertainty into a successful, highly productive stage four team. This requires work and a thorough understanding of the many internal/external influences that can occur during each stage. A team member or leader who is well versed in these stages and who can evolve with each stage will be better equipped to deal with possible obstacles that can hinder group progress and implement practices to help the group successfully work through a particular stage. The goal is for the group to become a team that will value the importance of everyone’s contribution within the group and how it relates to the overall ability of the group to successfully accomplish the mission. As this is achieved, the work will no longer feel like a chore as team members encourage, inspire, and have fun completing tasks and achieving the desired outcome (Wheelan, 2013).…

    • 1324 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The features of effective team performance are set out in Brian Tuckman’s phases of team development theory, ‘Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing.’ This outlines the phases that a team will go through in order to become effective and reach maturity. At the ‘Forming’ stage of team development individual roles and responsibilities are unclear and each member of the team is concerned to avoid conflict with each other. From this point the team will go through the ‘Storming’ phase which is when they start to conflict as individuals put forward ideas which will be challenged by others in a bid to gain power and position over others. After this the ‘Norming’ phase follows and it is at this point that individual roles are defined and accepted and ground rules and conduct are agreed. After each of these stages the team then reaches the ‘Performing’ stage which is where they are all working towards the same shared goal. This theory shows that for all teams to be effective each individual needs to be clear on their role, responsibilities and shared end goal. This is achieved through positive leadership, utilising the skills of the team and addressing weaknesses to make the team more effective.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ratzburg, Wilf H.. (n.d.). Group Cohesiveness. In Organizational Behavior. Retrieved September 13, 2009, from http://www.geocities.com/athens/forum/1650/htmlgroups18.html.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    this is when the team begin to feel comfortable and begin to communicate effectively to…

    • 3348 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By this stage team members should know one another better (start to appreciate eachothers differences and strengths) and also may bond with one another. Discussions are developing as they…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When a group of people get together to do the same thing they starts to build a team, Bruce Tuckman in 1965 come up with an theory that explains how a group of people become a good team. He said that there are four stages to make a good team they are: Forming, Storming, Norming and Performing. Forming is the stage when everyone is trying to get to know each over, however is not sure of what they are doing and look to the person in charge, And also not a lot of agreement in the team. Then there is Storming this is when everyone’s trying to finder there place in the group also this is when relationship are formed meaning that it is easy to get distracted from the task on hand, Likewise it hard for the team to make decisions together. Then there’s Norming this is when they fist start to work as a good team it is easy for them to make a group decision, positions and roles in the group are respected and understood. Also this is when they may start to have fun outside of the work meeting up and doing social activities together. Last there is Performing this is when the…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first stage of group development is the forming stage. Forming is when members get to know each other and find common ground, while the group leader provides structure, direction and ground rules. For example, in the movie, The Breakfast Club, the forming stage was the point at which students were forced into a group during detention, which provided structure and rules and allowed individuals to become familiar with one another. The second stage in group development is the storming phase, which usually involves arguments, power struggles, debates and general conflict of interest, often resulting in individuals perceiving such gathering as a waste of time. An example of this stage also seen in the The Breakfast Club is where differing opinions and ideas due to variations in social norms created conflict and arguments within the group. However, if a team leader is able to get past this stage by reminding…

    • 1071 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virgin group of companies has various stages of development that influences the continuous development of the company. Dr. Bruce Tuckman first introduced his 'Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing and Adjourning' model as a means to explain team development and behaviour. His model essentially clarifies the idea that as the team "develops maturity and ability, relationships establish, and leader changes leadership style. " The Tuckman theory is widely known as a a basis for effective team building. The first stage, 'Forming,' portrays a stage where groups are in the process of adapting to a new environment with a new team and there is a high degree of uncertainty between employees as they struggle to understand who is in charge of certain tasks and overall what the company's goals and objectives essentially are…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diverse Society

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The group cohesiveness mean the point of interpersonal attractiveness surrounded by group, reliant on aspect like immediacy, relationship, and appeal along with the entity group associate, group size, intergroup opposition and conformity about object. However, the degree to which a group can put into effect its norms and authority its member’s performance depends to several coverage on the group’s appeal for its element on its group cohesiveness (Eisenberg, J. 2007).…

    • 550 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    b) What is group cohesiveness? Briefly explain SIX (6) ways a group can increase cohesiveness among members.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays