Preview

xxfh,k

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
xxfh,k
We the subscribers , citizens of the said Commonwealth, having taken into serious consideration, a Bill printed by order of the last Session of General Assembly, entitled “A Bill establishing a provision for Teachers of the Christian Religion,” and conceiving that the same if finally armed with the sanctions of a law, will be a dangerous abuse of power, are bound as faithful members of a free State to remonstrate against it, and to declare the reasons by which we are determined. We remonstrate against the said Bill,

Because we hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth, “that religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence.” The Religion then of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man; and it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate. This right is in its nature an unalienable right. It is unalienable, because the opinions of men, depending only on the evidence contemplated by their own minds cannot follow the dictates of other men: It is unalienable also, because what is here a right towards men, is a duty towards the Creator.
Few men, so well equipped intellectually as was Madison, have, by reason of the characteristics of their equipment, been so dependent for success upon the conditions amid which they have been placed. Madison was preeminently what may be called a cabinet statesman. He was better as a thinker than as an actor.

James Madison had the constructive quality, and was a master of principles of government; but in the practical application of those principles which he himself had formulated and shaped, if not created, he was not fitted to excel, unless possibly when the current of events was running smoothly. Never was a ruler less fitted to hold the helm in troubled times, and it was hard fortune for him to receive from his friend and predecessor the bequest of a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The book consists of three parts and covers many events and issues of the young American Republic. It is not set of biographies but detailed review, critique and analyses of several seminal occurrences, mainly duel between Alexander Hamilton and the Governor of New York, Burr (part 1).…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    James Madison begins his paper stating that he believes that each branch of the government should be independent from one another. If possible the branches would have as little agency with one another as possible. He believed that members from the different branches of the government should not be able to appoint each other or decide on other salaries. If these rules were followed the people would be in more control of the government by picking the best representative in each branch of the government. Madison and the Framers realized that every position couldn’t be elective because of political pressures and certain needed qualifications, such as in the judicial…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson, for example, could not immediately abolish Adams' national bank because it would be too drastic a move for someone with his popularity, despite the fact that it was established without the Constitution granting that power to the federal government (Blum). Jefferson's most grand defiance of his strict interpretation of the Constitution was his purchase of the Louisiana Territory. Even though he was not given the power to purchase land in the Constitution, Jefferson couldn't pass up the opportunity to double the nation's size at a time of such large-scale westward movement. After his presidency (1816), Jefferson wrote a letter to Samuel Kercheval (document G) that gave his support for change to the Constitution with change to the times, which is a very far leap from claiming that nothing could be done in the national government without the Constitution granting them the power to do it. Madison is guilty of the same deviations from typical Republican strict constructionist policy. He was attacked by John Randolph (document F) for being too much like a Federalist, particularly when using the national government's power to set tariffs like the one proposed in 1816. This was not the first time Madison was attacked for his pseudo-Federalist policies. He received abundant criticisms…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most important concerns of the argument presented by James Madison in The Federalist No. 41 & 45 is the possible misappropriation of power that the government has over the country. Madison stresses the importance of maintaining civil liberties and preventing the government from having too much power. The new government will be granted great influence over many aspects of life for the American citizen so there must be a system of checks and balances.…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Alexander Hamilton (2004), Ron Chernow tackles the errand of depicting America's most questionable Founding Father. The book gives an expansive perspective of the scene of early America, with unique accentuation on Hamilton's accomplishments and his relationship to certain Founders.Before understanding this book, my contemplations concurred with the prevalent picture of Hamilton as a splendid however tyrannical man who was as often as possible required in outrages or in clashes with different Founders. I heard that he pushed government, protectionism, mercantilism, a solid government, and a national bank. I additionally realized that he had something to do with the Constitution and thought of a portion of The Federalist Papers. I realized…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the Revolutionary war, America had to create a new government. George Washington accomplished many things and solved even more problems. Then President Jefferson and Madison came into their terms’ and run rolled all of his work. President Washington achieved four main goals during his two terms; avoiding a war, establishing a economy, stopped British from aiding Native Americans and creating a federal government. In the time of Jefferson’s and Madison’s terms’ they concluded somethings, but they were of no help for anyone but themselves, and sometimes not even themselves. Actually, they started more problems than what they solved through starting a new government, the Louisiana Purchase, and the War of 1812.…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the presidencies of Jefferson and Madison, Republicans, such as Jefferson were seen as strict constructionists of the Constitution while Federalists, like Madison, were generally looser with their interpretations of the Constitution's literal meaning. While the constructionist ideas were part of what separated the two parties from one another, Jefferson and Madison are both guilty of not adhering to these ideas on many occasions. Jefferson writes in a letter to Gideon Granger expressing his idea that the United States is too large to have only one central government, and the states should receive more power, which goes against the fact that the Constitution was created in order to unite a new country. Also, when passing the Embargo Act, Jefferson demonstrates the federal power over the people, which goes against his Republican belief of allowing the states to have more power. As Madison prepares for his term in office, the citizens of the United States were most likely expecting him to be more open to suggestion in his interpretations of the Constitution. However, during a speech by Daniel Webster, a Federalist speaking on behalf of the entire Federalist Party, and a veto on internal improvements, Madison proves that he truly is not a loose constructionist as his party would have preferred him to be. Both Madison and Jefferson are guilty of frequently going against the general ideas of their parties in order to meet their needs at a certain time.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    R.B. Bernstein, a professor of law at New York Law School, and author of nearly twenty books on Early American legal and diplomatic history, is one of the latest in the long list of historians to attempt to tackle the life of Jefferson. In his work, Thomas Jefferson, Bernstein provides a well-organized and balanced history of Jefferson as he traces his life from his birth into one of Virginia’s wealthiest families, to his death as a man who was ridden with debt and insecure of his place in history. Published in 2003, the strength of Bernstein’s text does not lie in its ability to dissect this enigma of history, but in his ability to lay out his life and offer the facts as they exist without adding too much of his own opinion. Bernstein’s ability to write without muddling up the information he is presenting gives the reader a fairly unbiased look at the man who, in most of the other works he is covered in, takes the form of the authors perceptions. This is not to say that he does not give Jefferson credit for his achievements, or fault him where he deserves it, but Bernstein is able to point out these positive and negative features of Jefferson’s life without adding too much conjecture.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most influential statesmen in the early republican period was James Madison. Madison was one of the patriots who wrote the Federalist Papers, which were responsible for the acceptance and eventual ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The papers brought up some of the main reasons why the Constitution ought to have been ratified, and many solutions to the evils that would potentially be faced by the United States. In his papers Madison drew attention especially to the concern of the tyranny of the majority and the possible solutions to his concern. He first considered where the problem stems with factions, but went on to look at solutions to the effect of factions because factions themselves were not his greatest…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Of 1812 Dbq Essay

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    James Madison was pinned down by two choices that could effectively destroy everything that America had built or enhance living conditions and the economy tenfold. James Madison, our 5th US president had to choose whether to wage war against Britain or call for peace. Citizens around the nation had different opinions, and the ideas from each citizen had ranged from creating a peace treaty or running Britain to the ground. At the time, Britain was one of the greatest world powers and was disrespecting America to many lengths. America needed to be justice for the pent up anger and in response, Madison had called for war, but after the war had ended, many had argued whether or not the war of 1812 had even hurt Britain or changed the economy in…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He then went to represent Virginia. For example, in The Summer of 1787 it says “They agreed on the solution. Power must be taken from the states and given to a national government. To achieve that solution, the delegates would have to navigate through state jealousies, competing economic interests, and the clashing egos of individual delegates” (Stewart 25). This statement demonstrates Madison’s very real concern for the country because he took the time to concentrate on how the conflict in the nation needed to be resolved before going to the Convention.…

    • 2289 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To save the minority from the power of the majority by having a robust republic. James Madison is arguing for a dexterous federal government to be protect the people. Madison support this point in of protecting individual right by evidence found in the Federalist 10. James Madison is trying to persuade the people of America that his view for the government is the right one. Madison see what happen when a weak federal government is in control it lead to government who is ineffective at providing the state the assistance that it need then the states fall into disorder.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    They believed that a large republic was vulnerable to divisions that would undermine national unity. Their reasoning was an extension to their desire for a homogenous community. While it is true that a nation works best when its populace is united in support of the common good, it is imperative to understand how “impracticable” and “unwise” it would be to eradicate factions. According to Madison, factions are an inevitable result of the liberty granted to citizens to express their views in public. The danger with such internal divisions is not so much their causes, but rather their effects.…

    • 1433 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War of 1812 has brought immense pressure among Madison to unite and inspire the nation to fight together and in addition to reflect the U.S as a strong force among others. James Madison, fourth president of the United States, was widely viewed as introverted as well as respected for his intellect. In 1813, during the midst of the War of 1812, Madison delivered his second inaugural address to the white men in America eligible to vote. During 1813, Madison is addressing a nation divided in a time calling for unity and harmony. Madison thoroughly expresses conflicts of the war between the British and Indians as wells as how America is being perceived by other nations. Through the use of ethos, pathos, and logos, organization, and diction Madison…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays