Project Planning * Recognized need for new IT platform and partner * Recognized the solution of a “robust and flexible” information system that would meet the needs of all 32 chapters and be modestly priced * Ex-CIO in YA Mass chapter takes over execution of project
Project Execution * Hired part-time project manager to oversee project * Creation and submission of lists of requirements that each chapter found necessary going forward * Delivered on time and within budget, however it wasn’t easy (see good, bad, ugly chart in case) * Stand-out issues: chapter backed out during development, “computer-phobic” chapters and unrealistic expectations of ITS, leads to too much demand for functionality of system
2. Potential stakeholders: Local artists, YA chapter executives, board of directors including the ex-CIO, vendor Stakeholder | Stakeholder Interests | Potential Impact | Level of Power | Local artists | They would want better scheduling, overall easier job | Minimal impact on project but will feel effects of change | Low- subject to higher up changes | Chapter Execs | Execs have identified need for better ITS partner, execs need their chapters to work more efficiently and would be interested in more up to date technology, more IT support and a system that makes their job easier | Execs had the ability to voice their opinions when asked to submit their requirements to the project director, after that it was out of their hands, had ability to keep | Appointed a stakeholder from their own chapter to review the changes being made and make sure that changes would be helpful | Board of Directors | Need to create a more united front, need to stay within budget of a non-profit