An Examination of Field Data Collection, Analysis and Dissemination
Abstract
GLOBAL RESPONSE AND RELIEF EFFORTS TO THE 2011 JAPAN EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI, AND THE 2010 HAITIAN EARTHQUAKE HAVE ILLUMINATED THE NEED FOR NEW COLLABORATIVE MODELS TO FACILITATE EFFECTIVE RESPONSE TO INTERNATIONAL CRISES AND CONFLICTS. INTO THE LIMELIGHT, THE RELATIVELY NEW PHENOMENON OF “CROWD SOURCING”, DEFINED AS THE ACT OF OUTSOURCING TASKS, TRADITIONALLY PERFORMED BY AN EMPLOYEE OR CONTRACTOR, TO AN UNDEFINED, LARGE GROUP OF PEOPLE OR COMMUNITY (A CROWD), THROUGH AN OPEN CALL, HAS EMERGED. AS WITNESSED IN RECENT YEARS, DISASTER RESPONSE MEASURES DRAW A CROWD CONSISTING OF A WIDE DEMOGRAPHIC POPULATION, OFTEN COMPOSED OF A MYRIAD OF CIVILIAN, MILITARY, LAW ENFORCEMENT, RESCUE WORKERS, WORKING SIDE-BY-SIDE WITH PEOPLE REPRESENTING GOVERNMENT AND NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS SPANNING THE LOCAL, STATE, NATIONAL, AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL. THIS CROWD IS OFTEN EQUIPPED WITH MOBILE TECHNOLOGY (SMARTPHONES). THIS FACT, COUPLED WITH THE AVAILABILITY OF CELLULAR AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, HAS INCREASED THE SPEED AND QUANTITY AT WHICH INFORMATION ABOUT A DISASTER SITE AND THE RESULTING HUMAN SUFFERING REACHES THE REST OF THE GLOBE.
The relief efforts in Japan and Haiti emphasized the need for implementing knowledge management practices to more effectively leverage the sheer amount and corresponding proliferation and dissemination of data attributable to crowd sourcing. The challenges presented by the increased need for knowledge sharing and collaboration across a non-homogenous crowd with potentially widely varying culture, language, expertise, and priorities is readily apparent. Incompatible data often renders disaster site data unusable or requires too much time to convert for the crowd – which includes first responders - to effectively use and share.
The United States sponsors a variety of disaster management and
References: ALAVI, M. & KANE, G. C. “KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT: AN EVOLUTIONARY VIEW”. ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM. VOL. 12, 2008, PP. 63–85. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. “Knowledge management systems: Emerging views and practices from the field”. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. “Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues”. MIS Quarterly. Vol. 25, No. 1, 2001, pp. 107-136. Churchill, E.F. and Bly S. “Virtual Environments at Work: Ongoing Use of MUDs in the Worskpace”. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Work Activities Coordination and Collaboration. San Francisco, CA., ACM Press, New York, 1999. Borghoff, Uwe M. and Pareschi, Remo. “Information Technology for Knowledge Management “. Journal of Universal Computer Science. Vol. 3, No. 8, 1997, pp. 835-842 submitted: 1/6/97, accepted: 10/8/97, appeared: 28/8/97 ã Springer Pub. Co. Chen, Chung-Jen and Huang, Jing-Wen. “How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge management—The social interaction perspective”. International Journal of Information Management. Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 104–118. De Long, David W. and Fahey, Liam Fahey. “Diagnosing Cultural Barriers to Knowledge Management”. Academy of Management Executive. Vol 14, No. 4, 2000. Giovannini, E. “The role of communication in transforming statistics into knowledge”. Working Papers. 2008. Golbeck, Jennifer and Hendler, James. “Inferring Trust Relationships in Web-based Social Networks”, University of Maryland, College Park Computer Science Department. Working paper, 2006. Kaklauskas, A.; Amaratunga, D.; and Haigh.. “Knowledge Management for Post-Disaster-Management”. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. Vol. 13, 2009 , pp. 117–128. Klien, E., Lutz, M., and Kuhn, W. “Ontology-based Discovery of Geographic Information Services – An Application in Disaster Management”. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. 2005. Larsson, Rikard. “Case Survey Methodology: Qunatitative Analysis of Patterns Across Case Studies”. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 36, No. 6, 1993, pp. 1515-1546. Putnam, R.D.; Leonardi, R,; Nanetti, R. “Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy”. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ, 1993. Stenmark, D. “Information vs. knowledge: the role of intranets in knowledge management”. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, (HICSS, 2002). Stenmark, D., & Lindgren. “Integrating knowledge management systems with everyday work: Design principles leveraging user practices”. In Proceedings of 37th International Conference in Systems Sciences (HICSS), IEEE Computer Society, 2004. Thomas, J.C.; Kellogg, W.A.; Erickson, T. “The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management”. IBM Systems Journal. Vol. 40 No. 4, 2001, pp. 863-884. Vuorikari, R.; Ochoa, X.; and Duval, E. “Analysis of User Behavior on Multilingual Tagging of Learning Resources”. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Social Information Retrieval for Technology-Enhanced Learning & Exchange. 2007. "There 's a List for That". blog.twitter.com. October 30, 2009. http://blog.twitter.com/2009/10/theres-list-for-that.html. Retrieved December 31, 2010. "Using Twitter With Your Phone". Twitter Support. http://help.twitter.com/entries/14226-how-to-find-your-twitter-short-long-code. Retrieved December 31, 2010. Zuckerberg, Mark. "500 Million Stories". Facebook. http://blog.facebook.com/blog.php?post=409753352130. Retrieved December 28, 2010. Kazeniac, Andy. "Social Networks: Facebook Takes Over Top Spot, Twitter Climbs". Compete.com. http://blog.compete.com/2009/02/09/facebook-myspace-twitter-social-network/. Retrieved February 17, 2009. [2] Thomas, J.C.; Kellogg, W.A.; Erickson, T. “The knowledge management puzzle: Human and social factors in knowledge management”. IBM Systems Journal. Vol. 40 No. 4, 2001, pp. 863-884. [3] Salisbury, M. W. “Putting theory into practice to build knowledge management Systems”. Journal of Knowledge Management. Vol. 7, No. 2, 2003, pp. 128-141 [4] Thomas, J.C.; Kellogg, W.A.; Erickson, T