Preview

A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
754 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Paper
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm by Richard M. Cyert and James G. March

This book explains the model that the authors created for administrative decision making. The basis for the model the authors created has two main ideas: (1) it includes a comprehensive set of changeable categories; (2) it has a set of relational concepts. The classic model had two basic assumptions. The first assumption is that making money is always the bottom-line and the second is perfect knowledge. The classic theory was not adequate to deal with oligopolistic markets. The theory in this book is an alternative to manage modern, multi-product firms.
Categories
The authors feel that organizations operate using goals, expectations, and decisions. Organizational goals are controlled by 2 things: (1) what things are viewed as important; (2) the aspiration level of the organization toward accomplishing each goal. Expectations are what the organization sees as being reasonable prospect using available information from past endeavors and from other organizations in the market. Organizational choices are the actions taken by an institution when problems arise. Choices are made according to previously established rules and regulations. These variable categories make up the first part of the Behavioral Theory Model.
Concepts
The second part of the model is made up of relational concepts. There are 4 major concepts in Cyert and March’s theory: (1) quasi resolution of conflict, (2) uncertainty avoidance, (3) problemistic search, and (4) organizational learning. These ideas are the fundamentals to understanding decision-making processes in contemporary, large-scale business organizations.
Quasi Resolution of Conflict. The quasi resolution of conflict is related to goals, local rationale, decision rules, and attention to goals. Organizational goals are constraints that institution members must strive toward, regardless of personal ambitions. Rationality is facilitated by decision rules and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Deutsch, M, (2000) The Handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass Inc.…

    • 8781 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    5DPP Written Report

    • 2399 Words
    • 7 Pages

    *9 The Happy Manager, (2015). Rational Decision Making Model, Bringing Structure to Decision Making. [online] Available at: http://www.the-happy-manager.com/articles/rational-decision-making-model/ [Accessed 18 Jan. 2015].…

    • 2399 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brockmann, Erich. (1996, May). Removing the paradox of conflict from group decisions. Academy of Management Executive. v10n2, p. 61-62.…

    • 5037 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Harrison, E. (1993). Inter-disciplinary models of decision making. Management Decision, 31(8), 27. Retrieved February 14, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 603236).…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Simon, H. (1979). “Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations”, The American Economic Review. Vol. 69, Issue 4, pp.493-513…

    • 2474 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Within the realm of conflict management, there are two primary dimensions: assertiveness – which is derived from a concern for others; and competitiveness – which is derived from a concern for self. From these two realms, we find 5 conflict styles which include: avoidance (which is a lose-lose situation for both parties); accommodation (which is a lose-win situation); competition (which is a win-lose); compromise (also a lose – lose situation); and collaboration (which is a win-win situation for both parties).…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cited: Mayer, B. (2000). The Dynamics of Conflict Resolution: A Practitioner 's Guide. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Vliert, E. V., & Dreu, C. K. (1997). Using Conflict in Organizations. Sage Publications. NYC:…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Teamwork Turmoil

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Wisinski, J. (1993). Resolving conflicts on the job. New York: American Management Association, pp. 27-31.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To varying degrees, each of these forms of goal conflict exists in the modern organization, but approach-avoidance is most relevant to the analysis of conflict.…

    • 3952 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Growth within any organization brings about a certain amount of change, and this can be unsettling to some individuals who have grown accustomed to a certain way of doing things, as well as a feeling of being overwhelmed with new functionalities and a sense that their once close nit family oriented business has exploded into an organization where they are now just a number on a spreadsheet. This can be the springboard towards resistance to change, but numerous varieties exist, and it is those that might originate from our organization’s structure and culture towards our planned changes that I have been asked by my director to research. In order to better comprehend the notion of employee resistance; however, I think it is best if we first try to define it.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Rationality Is Limited

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The present organization administration theories are to a great extent a result of the post-war development of organizational science. The classical doctrine and human relation thinking have been replayed for sociological academic organization science. Researchers, in particular in the field of psychology, have begun to message examples of constraints in people’s judgment and decision-making since the 50’s. One of these researchers is Herbert Simon (1916 - 2001). Herbert Simon is known for what is known in the economy, sociology and political science as the idea of bounded rationality. This researcher judged rational decision-making models for ignoring several factors and considers that people won’t necessarily take an optimal decision; they will take a decision that is adequate. The efforts that must been taken for making an optimal decision could be too large, so people will be satisfied with a suboptimal decision; this suboptimal decision will require less effort. By this limited number of alternatives, a wrong choice can be made, and a decision may and a taken decision can be wrong. Therefor it is important to take account of the environment when making a decision. However, saying this does not mean people are irrational; it is based on limiting rational behaviour to optimize the utility function. So rationality is limited and people operate from emotional and/or irrational motives as well. Several empirical studies indicate that consumers don’t always behave rationally. For example studies of Tversky and Kahneman to cognitive anomalies: conditions under which individuals are clearly not…

    • 1862 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Theory of Firm

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages

    The firm's goal is to maximize profits, !. In order to do this it must decide what quantity of a good to produce given costs, technology and demand. A competitive firm is assumed to be able to sell as much as it wants at the market price without affecting price. So it takes price as exogenous (beyond it's control) and does not worry about demand. In addition, for our purpose we’ll assume the firm operates efficiently, that is, whatever the level of production that the firm chooses, that level of production will always be produced at the minimum possible cost. Profit is defined by the difference between total revenue (TR) and total cost (TC). Both TC and TR are functions of quantity. TR is defined as: (price per unit of the good)*(quantity of the good sold). It is a linear function, TR=Pq, where P equals the price of the good, q the quantity sold. The slope of the TR line is P and the price is the amount the firm receives if it produces and sells one more unit of the good. Marginal revenue (MR) is the additional revenue the firm gets from selling one more unit, given a particular level of sales. Therefore, marginal revenue is equal to P. The slope of the TR line is P, equal to MR. Because the firm takes price as given, our TR line has a constant slope. Total cost, TC, on the other hand, is a more complicated function of quantity. It may vary at different rates with different quantities, as we shall soon see. Marginal cost (MC) is the increase in cost from producing one more unit of the good given the amount you are already producing. The marginal cost to produce your first ton of steel, in a certain time period, is probably higher than the MC of the hundred and first ton in that same period. To produce the first ton you must build a plant, buy equipment, train labor and pay for all of the fixed costs associated with opening a steel plant. The hundred and first ton involves only the cost of the ore, the energy, the man hours and other…

    • 3347 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The approach looks at rational approaches to decision making or the selecting from among possible alternatives to an action or idea. It looks at the decision, the person making the decision or the organization making the decision. It evaluates alternatives. Since management is about making decision, the future development of management theory will include decision making as a center focus.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Organizational Behaviour

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages

    In understanding the context of Organizational behavior, we first have to know in detail the ‘What is Organizational Behavior’. Organizational behavior brings up to the attitudes and behavior of the individuals in an organization. On the other hand, it is also a inter-disciplinary field of study that draws from many of the behavioral sciences. Practically, the goal of organizational behavior is to apply the concepts from the other behavioral sciences to persistent complications that management may be facing, as well as in applying the organizational behavior to the administrative theory and practices. Certainly, organizational studies comprise the study of organizations from the multiple perspectives, methods, and levels of analysis. Organizational behavior can be divided into two, which is the Micro and Macro. The "Micro" organizational behavior talks about more to individual and group dynamics in organizations. And the "Macro" represents strategic management and organizational theory studies for the whole organizations and industries, especially on how they adapt, and the strategies, structures, and contingencies that easily guide them.…

    • 2264 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays