Preview

A Critical Examination of Judith Thomsons Argument for Abortion

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Critical Examination of Judith Thomsons Argument for Abortion
Judith Thomson’s argument through her article, “A Defence of Abortion” is one that adopts the premise that the fetus is a human being from the moment of conception. By doing this, Thomson is distancing her argument from the various theorists who maintain the moral view that it is wrong to kill another human being, such as (Marquis, 1989). This ultimately allows her to assume various hypothetical situations in which the cognitive status of the fetus is otherwise not considered. This is important. It helps the case she develops to detach itself from the focal points considered in the 'common argument', which illustrates that the development of a human being from conception through birth into childhood and then adulthood is continuous, and to draw a line where abortion is acceptable is futile. Thomson’s argument that contrasts a “right to life” against a “right to decide what happens in and to one’s body" is based on what Finnis describes as “confusing the issue” (Finnis, 1973). Throughout the article, her various thought experiments are presented in order to support and help the reader identify situations in which the permissibility of abortion seems just. This essay will scrutinise the effectiveness of Thomson’s ideas, and whether they have led to a more definable understanding when defending abortion.
From the assumed premise that Thomson begins her article with, she develops a juxtaposition between every person's right to life and the mother's right to her own body. The concurrent positions held by the mother and fetus are alluded to in Thomson's first thought experiment which is heavily discussed throughout her argument in defending abortion. The thought experiment in question is of the "famous unconscious violinist". In so many words, it involves a situation in which your circulatory system is unknowingly plugged into the violinist's, in order to keep him from dying. Also, unplugging means death to the violinist, and nine months is the amount of time the



References: Finnis, J., 1973. The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 117-145 Larkins, S.L., Page, R.P., Panaretto, K.S., Scott, R., Mitchell, M.R., Alberts, V., Veitch, P.C and McGinty, S., 2007. Attitudes and behaviours of young Indigenous people in Townsville concerning relationships, sex and contraception: the “U Mob Yarn Up” project. Medical Journal of Australia, vol. 186, No. 10, pp. 513-518 Marquis, D., 1989. Why Abortion is Immoral. Journal of Philosophy, vol. 86, pp. 183-202 Russell, D.E.H., 1990. Rape In Marriage. Indiana University Press Temkin, J., 2006. Rape and the Legal Process. pp. 86 Thomson, J.J., 1971. A defense of Abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 1, No. 1 Tooley, M., 1972. Abortion and Infanticide. Philosophy and Public Affairs, vol. 2, pp. 37-65

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The question between whether abortion is morally right or wrong has been talked about for years and no common ground has been made. Judith Thomson, a believer in Pro-choice, argues that abortion is not wrong because the mother should have a choice of what happens to her body. In response to this, Donald Marquis who is against abortion believes every fetus is a human with a right to have a future like ours. Each Ethicist gives examples and theories as to why abortion is wrong or right. In this essay, I will attempt to show that abortion is okay in some cases, and Donald Marquis’s views and arguments are broad and incorrect.…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The debate about abortion focuses on two issues; 1.) Whether the human fetus has the right to life, and, if so, 2.) Whether the rights of the mother override the rights of the fetus. The two ethicists who present strong arguments for their position, and who I am further going to discuss are that of Don Marquis and Judith Thomson. Marquis' "Future Like Ours" (FLO) theory represents his main argument, whereas, Thomson uses analogies to influence the reader of her point of view. Each argument contains strengths and weaknesses, and the point of this paper is to show you that Marquis presents a more sound argument against abortion than Thomson presents for it. An in depth overview of both arguments will be presented in the paper, as well as a critique of both the pros and cons that stem out from the question-begging arguments.…

    • 3100 Words
    • 89 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    She justifies this point with the violinist case, which states that a famous violinist is about to die so his fan base nonconsensually kidnaps you and hooks your origins up to his for 9 months until he can get better and live on his own again. As the reader, you can choose to stay hooked up to him or cut the cords, which would kill the violinist, but allow you to live your life as you did previously. Thomson argues that it would be extremely unfair and immoral to you to force you to stay attached to the violinist, as you had nothing to do with him being connected to you in the first place. She goes on to compare this to nonconsensual intercourse that causes pregnancy and states that it is morally acceptable to abort the fetus because, just like being attached to the violinist, a woman did not ask for or do anything to warrant being pregnant. Her next argument was on the topic of abortion when the mother's life is at risk.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thompson feels that its false. In her first thought experiment, she goes on talk about how one day you just wake up in the hospital with a famous violinist attached to your kidneys, and he needs the use of your kidneys for nine months. You have to keep in mind that every person has a right to life and so the violinist has a right to life so it would be impressionable to unplug the violinist. You also have a right to bodily integrity which trumps a right to life. This example shows us that there are some cases in which abortion is morally permissible. This analogy about a pregnancy that resulted from a…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    4.Saul. Jennifer in 'Philosopher 's on abortion ', Audio 3 Track 5, The Open University, Milton Keynes.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thompson and Don Marquis both have markedly different views on the topic of abortion. Thompson generally argues that there are cases where abortion may be morally permissible, due to the rights of the mother, while Marquis argues that abortion is almost always morally wrong, except under extraordinary circumstances, because the fetus has a future life. In this paper, I will evaluate the arguments of both parties, as well as identify what premises, if any, they both agree on. In addition, I will supply my own reasoning for why I believe that Marquis presents the more successful argument.…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Overview of the Argument There is many arguments against abortion. Part of them argue that the fetus is a person at the moment of conception. To that Thomson asks the question: At what point is conception? “Before this point the thing is not a person, after this point it is a person.”…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    By treating the fetus as a person, she takes into account the rights of both the mother and the fetus. However, she doesn’t base her arguments on possible futures, like Marquis- instead she compares their situations (one party growing within, the other being forced to house it), personal rights, and responsibilities to one another (if any). What was particularly convincing to me about her argument was how she argued that abortion does not need to be decent or unselfish to be morally permissible. This removes a lot of the responsibility of a mother to keep an unwanted fetus just to be a “good person”, rather than end their unwanted pregnancy. Thompson’s definition of the right to life was also significant to me.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated Bibliography

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marquis, Don. "Why Abortion Is Immoral." Journal of Philosophy 86 (1989): 183-202. Print. This journal is written by a philospher by the name of Don Marquis. While this document is quit outdated it still plays an important role in today 's debate about abortion. It is used by pro-life activists when debating the reasons why they feel abortion is immoral. This journal is long and filled with great ideas to ponder about life, its meaning and signifigance to the world. Marquis has etched his name with this written journal in the never ending debate of wether abortion is right or wrong. I think this piece will be valuable to my essay in that it will give my audience a deeper perception than the current idea that abortion should be a womens choice.…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to boldily autonomy and the clear distinction between a fetus and a rational, self-aware person, abortion is morally permissible practically whenever the mother chooses it, given it is done humanely. Most people would agree that in cases where the woman did not choose pregnancy, like rape, abortion should be morally permissible due to bodily autonomy and the immorality of asking someone to undergo psychological and physical trauma due to something beyond their control. This is supported by the Famous Violinist argument which explains that women, especially those who are pregnant due to rape, are not morally obligated to endure this immense sacrifice, even if it would be nice to do so (Singer, 1975, p.113-114). Whilst Thomson’s argument has fallen under criticism based on utilitarianism, these arguments are countered by Singer’s deconstruction of the Conservative Argument and its flawed perception that human life is inherently special, which demonstrates the moral permissibility of most abortions. The Conservative Argument’s premise that a fetus is an innocent human can mean two things: either the fetus is a person that has self-awareness and rational thought or a fetus is a member of the human species (Singer, 1975, p.117).…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Amoral of Abortion:

    • 4614 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Lunneborg, Patricia W. Abortion : A Positive Decision. New York, N.Y. 1992. Bergin & Garvey Publications.…

    • 4614 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another example Thomson uses to make her argument is that opponents use that abortion is “directly killing a child” therefore killing an innocent person is morally wrong however, “letting a person die” as in the case of the mother’s life being at risk would not be directly killing them. Thomson supports that this does not give the mother’s life the same status as the unborn child’s life and ignores her natural tendency for self-preservation.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fetus Rights

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Cited: Kaczor, Christopher Robert.The Ethics of Abortion: Women 's Rights, Human Life, and the Question of Justice. New York: Routledge, 2011. Print.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Law Paper

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sass, Lauren R. Abortion: Freedom of Choice & the Right to Life. New York: Facts on File, 1978.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays