Julius Cesare marked the beginning of this empire. They had an autocratic form of government; held lots of land around the Mediterranean and throughout Europe. It was weak partly because of the many civil wars.…
There have been many governments that affected civilization. A government is in charge of making sure the society is stable. Two great examples of these political figures are Russia under Peter the Great, and Germany under Adolf Hitler. Both of these bodies of government showed Change, Propaganda, and military power. These three things impacted their society in a big way, and the decisions there leaders made.…
Two of the major powers in Europe quickly took the lead in settling the New World. The first, Spain, was very interested in acquiring huge amounts of gold, silver, and other rare valuables. In fact, the only reason they stumbled upon America is because they were en route to the Far East in search of the "fabled wealth of the Indies." What they found turned out to be much more valuable than a shipload of gold. A new continent was discovered-- one with unbelievable potential. Spain was able to take great advantage of its new found wealth, but made some bad decisions that in the long run did not help to solidify their existence in America. The pursuit of riches was not the only motivation for the Spaniards to come to America, though. Some men wanted to create a "profitable agricultural economy" as well as spread the Christian religion.…
When asked to consider why the mound builders of Cahokia chose their particular location, there has been a theory that stems from archeological research and evidence. One such theory is that they chose this location because of the Mississippi flood plain. The flood plain would be used as a major resource for not only food supply, but mainly transportation to other parts of the city. Likewise, researchers such as Joseph Saunders has found little to no evidence of extensive trade among the areas around the mounds, thus he suggests that the mounds actually were not part of a closely connected culture, but rather a feature that each group may have used and interpreted differently.…
The respective form of government of Rome and Carthage has an "outward similarity" in terms of structure. If Rome has two consuls, Carthage on other hand has two chief magistrates called as suffetes. Carthaginians have also a legislative body such like the Roman Senate which is called the hundreds or "the counsel of thirty Nobles" (Mackay, 1999). In addition, it has also a citizen assembly similar to Rome's comitia (Moray,1901). In governmental organization the two two great nations were parallel to each other, however in terms of the internal affairs of their respective states they were entirely antipodal.…
In the sixth and seventh century, Archaic Greece saw to the emergence of tyrants as a form of government due to social and political inequality. The tyrant’s form of government was effective economically and socially as it stabilised social disruptions and economic distress. However, it eventually led to political rivalry, which destabilised their form of government.…
I believe that the states had all the rights to take the tools and properties of the farmers to pay off the farmer's debts. I think that the property was a kind of collateral for the money that the farmers borrowed for the ammunition. <br><br>I do not think that Daniel Shays and his band of farmers had any right to rebel and close down the banks. I do think, however, that what he did was also a good thing. It made the states realize that a stronger central government was needed. It was used by important people such as George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton to help convince the different states to give more power to the central government. <br><br>I believe that the rebellion in itself wasn't very significant or important,…
Seeing as Rome had a new Democratic government, not one individual could rule. However, they still had votes on who to elect for government and for the contestants it was big competition. According to Document A “Life of Caesar” by Plutarch, even the competition for smaller, miserable-looking communities was tough. This is because there is always “jealous…
Trade happened mainly among royalty. It involved the exchange of dried fish, wool, barley, wheat, and metal goods for sweet-smelling wood and fruit. Then these materials were passed down to lower classes of people who paid for these materials.…
The beginning for the direction of government and administration started with Julius Caesar wanting a centralized, imperial form of government. His plans did not span out with upset elite classes that led to his assassination. The elite men wanted to create a government that was not in their power, which led to conflict and chaos. Augustus, otherwise known as Octavian, ended the struggle and was the leader to start the imperial rule that was right for Rome. The government was disguised as a republic. Just as Caesar, Augustus ruled by centralizing political and military power. He preserved traditional republican offices and forms of government. Members of the Roman elite were also members of the government. Augustus accumulated vast power and took full responsibility for the important governmental functions. As a form of a bureaucracy, he was very careful to place individuals loyal to him…
First to start with political structures of the cities, all of the city-states, like other Dark Age communities, were ruled by aristocratic clans. These three city-states had the same problems such as population growth, rapidly increasing inequalities between rich and poor people, because of this political structure but the solutions to these same problems were different in each city-state. To solve the problems, first, Corinthians created a new order to solve the problem which was called tyranny. This system had a leader called “tyrants” who were supported and chosen by citizens to meet their demands and solve the problems within the society. Tyrants restructured taxes, construct new structures for enhancing trade in the sea and they also gave rights to their supporters. “Tyranny” was successful for some time in Corinth but as it always happened before, the great weakness of this system arised. When the tyrant of Corinth, Periander, died, new tyrant weren’t supported by the citizens so the system collapsed with it. The system, then, turned into an oligarchic system and continued the tribal and council system established by tyrants and it was remarkably successful(CW , Ch.2 , pg 56). On the other hand, Spartans followed a different path to solve the problems. A unique military system and a rigid social structure were the basis of the Spartans’ political organization. Sparta was ruled by a system consisted of combination of monarchy, oligarchy and democracy. The…
An ancient Greek politician, Polybius, argues in “Why Romans and not the Greeks Governs the World” that the Romans were so well off during their time because of the perfect government they created by combining a kingship, an aristocracy, and a democracy. He argues that, separately, the three governments all had certain strengths, but all sooner or later fell. Polybius states that separately “regular” governments sooner or later fall either to disorder or tyranny. In an effort the avoid a cycle the Greeks faced of greatness followed by a rapid decline, the Romans sought to create a perfect constitution with the best aspects of the three other governments and at the same time created an effective form of checks and balances.…
As stated before, the government was very important in the Inca civilization and had a lot of impact on their civilization in general. In the Incan civilization the utmost in power was the emperor, then came the royal family. Often times many of the government leaders came straight from the royal family. This impacted the people meaning that is was harder for a common citizen to rise up in power to be a government administrator or leader. Another thing that impacted the society was that the government owned almost everything. This impacted the society in a very good way meaning that the people didn't have to worry about the buying and selling of property since not many people had their own. Another impact was that the government allocated all jobs to citizens. This impacted all citizens (everyone worked) meaning no one had the option to do what they dreamed of doing in life. That is how the government of the Incas impacted the civilization.…
The political system of Ancient Greece underwent several changes over the past few decades all tying in with individualism. The biggest change in the political system of Ancient Greece was how they went from a monarchy to an aristocracy around the 6th century B.C.E., to a democracy. In the Agora stood tall the government buildings where citizens would come together to ratify decisions of leaders. Soon, this agora would be turned into a marketplace, because traders always come to crowds to sell things. (Bulliet 105) During this time period, a monarchy still ruled over Ancient Greece until they entered the Age of Colonization from 750 to 550 B.C.E. Due to the successful warfare campaigns, Greece produced wealth very quickly and the percentage of middle class people rose. Soon afterward, Greece shifted by a land ruled by nobles to a money-based economy controlled by the middle class which led to an aristocracy led by tyrants (Butler, FC19: The Rise of Greek Democracy (c.750-500 BCE)). The tyrants who held power illegally were captured and ejected and the political system shifted over to a democratic system. Furthermore, the shift caused by individualism influenced other civilizations around the Mediterranean such as Carthage and…
Between 200 B.C.E. – 200 C.E. The Roman Empire ruled with an iron fist controlling mostly and if not all of the Mediterranean. This was due to two main factors, these are it military power and the political system it was able to develop. However most of the Romans accomplishment didn’t happen as an empire, but a republic. While as a republic, Romans created a political system that heavily influenced many to move to the Rome. In the article Ways of the World by Robert W. Strayer he states that the political system created “a written code of law offered plebeians (the poor class) some protection from abuse” from the upper or elite classes. Also this provided a better “system of public assemblies [that] provided an opportunity for lower classes to shape public policy and a new office of tribune” that would represent them in these assemblies. This was a huge part of Rome popularity and its growing number. This was the first time were the poorer classes had any kind of support from a political system. The Romans had get deal of pride with their newly developed system that benefited everyone. They also believed that the political system gave them a “greater freedom than did many of their more autocratic neighbors.”…