The politics of Corporate Social Responsibility; Reflection on the UN human right norms for corporation,” Company and securities Law 25, no…
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been a buzz phrase since the 1970’s. The Harvard Kennedy School defines CSR as something that “…addresses how companies manage their economic, social, and environmental impacts, as well as their relationships in all key spheres of influence: the workplace, the marketplace, the supply chain, the community, and the public policy realm.” (Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, 2008) In an article on the website “As You Sow” early CSR attempts are described as primarily philanthropic and consisted of giving…
In business world companies are interested in how to maintain or increase shareholder values and profit. So, in order to give something back to the general public, those companies have to assume their responsibilities by being aware of the effects of their activities in the community and take measures to control them because this can affect the community and the environment by polluting the air, destroying the ecosystem, over using natural resources and so on. CSR is often called corporate citizen which means that companies should be good neighbors of the community not to work against it but collaborate with the citizen or the society in order to increase their welfare, to make a community a better place to live. (catalyst consortium, july 2002)…
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) as a topic has received the attention of organisations and managers as a whole. The 1950s marked the start of the modern era of CSR for managers, where Howard R. Bowen (1953) defines social responsibilities in his publication as the businesses’ duty to make decision and follow principles that are acceptable to society. However, Milton Friedman (1970) argued that social responsibilities is for people not businesses, he claims that the only responsibility business managers should have is to use all their resources to maximise profit and increase shareholder’s wealth (Friedman, York Times Magazine, September 13, 1970, pp. 32-34).…
The Corporate Responsibility (CSR) debate is very topical. In the past when considering corporate philanthropy (charitable giving by companies), opinion tended to divide into those who considered is appropriate that companies (as the creators of economic wealth) should reasonably direct some resources towards good causes of their choosing; and those who vehemently oppose such practices on the grounds that company managers are not elected to address societal problems, are not mandated to make choices between social priorities, and are not empowered to give away other peoples’ money (i.e., that belonging to their shareholders). This debate is still relevant, though usually resolved by the value-judgments of the debaters – there are no absolute rights and wrongs.…
In this essay, we will discuss why organizations began CSR and how it is or can be or why should it be implemented. CSR usually get started off either as an integral part of the business strategy or corporate identity, or it can be used as a defensive policy, with the latter being used more often by companies targeted by activists. Rationale for CSR implementation is based on either a moral, a rational, or an economic argument (Werther & Chandler, 2006). Campbell (2007) which is a representative of a group of studies that create testable propositions related to the conditions under which organizations will move toward CSR. Studies show that corporations’ level of social responsibility as being influenced by factors such as financial conditions of the firm, health of the economy, and well-enforced state regulations.…
The first era of modern corporate social responsibility appears in the 1920s and it is the first time that the concept of social responsibility is developed from a corporate perspective rather than individual. This stems from a decline in individual ethic and a rise of social ethic required for industrial harmony (Hoffman,…
Debates over the concept of csr span from the 1930s to the 21st century. A debate over the responsibilities of corporate managers and directors to their shareholders and other groups directly influenced by corporations took place in North America during the 1930s, marking one of the first significant discourses on csr.5 However, following this exchange, discussions over csr became dormant until the 1960s when a social debate over csr as part of that decade’s wider discussion of the corporation’s growing power in society and politics emerged. The concept of csr was also globally driven in the 1960s as a result of the growing sophistication of consumers. It must be pointed out that consumers still continue to play a significant role in the growth of csr since consumers and pressure groups, especially in Europe and North America but also increasingly in developing countries, are demanding more responsibility from companies. The advance of technology has empowered these groups to effectively pressure companies, (especially those with highprofile brands) and hold them accountable for their behaviour or actions. The growth of csr continued due to the environmental movement in the 1970s and the growing concerns about the social impacts of business in the 1990s, which stemmed from the boom of corporate takeovers during the 1980s. Nevertheless, the impact of globalization had a direct influence on the prominence of csr. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 marked the modern era of globalization, because it brought into being a world…
Since the origins in the middle of last century (Spector, 2008 cited in Carroll and Shabana, 2010: 86), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has been becoming an increasingly influencing factor in corporate governance. KPMG (2008 cited in Du et al., 2010: 13) indicates that the proportion of the 250 hugest enterprises in the world who annually release CSR reports has grown up from 50% in 2005 to 80% in 2008. Porter and Kramer (2006: 80) declare that CSR is more likely to be advantages such as ‘opportunity, innovation, and competitive advantage’ for a company rather than disadvantages such as ‘cost, constraint or charitable deed’. This essay aims to explain and evaluate the extent to which this statement implies, and the benefits and drawbacks of CSR in terms of the short run and long run development in corporations.…
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) can be defined as the opportunities that the public has of organizations at a specified point (Carroll and Buchholtz 2003, p. 36). The view of corporate social responsibility says that organizations have principled and generous responsibilities in order to earn good return for investors by obeying the law appropriately. Corporate social responsibility produces an organized context how to improve and maintain the relationship between the two dynamic individuals such as “business and community”. However proprietors and managers of organizations have involved in various activities that we currently consider CSR as practical creation to technologically advanced revolt (Davis, Whitman and Zald, 2006). But, until the 1990s, CSR was normally restricted to communal civilization.…
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is always an on-going issue that companies have to cope with. What are the responsibilities that companies should take other than the maximization of return to shareholders and by taking such responsibilities, how it may affect the operation of the firms as well as how effectively such actions could have on the society. There have been two main positions on the CSR issue. The first is the Friedmanian one stating that “there is one and only one social responsibility of business – to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits so long as it stays within the rules of the games” (published in the book “Capitalism and Freedom”). The other view is that companies can and should deviate from the goal of maximizing profit to take others responsibilities that help to promote the total welfare of the whole society. I will first discuss these two viewpoints and give my opinions on such reasons then, finally, draw up my conclusion on CSR.…
Corporate social responsibility (abbr. CSR) refers a voluntary process of integrating environmental as well as social concerns into company’s business operations and incorporating this concept with interested party (Cruz, 2013). It entails that company should not only concern the profit but should also give back benefit to the environment and society. Over the past years, there has been an apparent increasing social awareness among consumers, which drives organization to keep abreast of this global trend and keep committed to deliver both private and public benefit. In this circumstance, it is no longer acceptable for a corporation to experience economic prosperity in isolation from those agents impacted by its actions. In other word, company is expected to be a good corporate citizen. Therefore, how to incorporate this concept into company’s corporate goal and implement it into operations becomes a big issue.…
CSR was firstly coined in 1953 with the publication of Bowen’s book named 'Social Responsibility of businessmen ', with the question of ‘what responsibilities to society can business people be reasonably expected to assume’ (Corporate Watch, 2013). To define CSR, it is better to explain what is corporation firstly. E-conomic (2013) defines it as the legal entity which is most used to conduct business. For instance, Starbucks, KFC are both famous corporations. It is stated that “CSR is a company’s status and activities with respect to its perceived societal, or, at least, stakeholder obligations” (Bhattacharya & Sen, 2004, p.9). Stakeholder of corporations includes not only customers, but also other people who do not buy the products, animals, employees, etc. Besides, according to Baker (2004), CSR is about how companies manage their business processes in order to produce an overall positive impact on society. This means companies should not only consider their own profits, they need to bring several benefits…
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has become an attractive issue in recently years, because several companies and people have noticed environmental or ethical problems of surrounding society, such as working places and pollution. Although the first Concept of CSR was proposed from the early 1950 and started being rarely discussed after Industrial Revolution, CSR is now using broadly in full integration with strategic management and corporate governance at 20th century to improve the reputation and profits of companies. This essay will argue that CSR could benefit companies to raise their business reputation, via building brand and products differentiation and strengthening relationship with workers, and enhance the competitive advantage to increase profits, such as complying with a standard legitimacy, even though some people think that the most important task is gaining the maximum profits and concern that CSR could cause a disadvantage because of lack of capacity to handle social activities.…
The Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has acquired extensive interest throughout the previous decades, even though, it is not an innovative concept, and it certainly dates back to the early years of 1930, as stated by Eric Orts, University of Pennsylvania. Prior to the World War II, the industrialists of Germany, Walter Rathenau, declared that the corporations have turned out to be huge and that they have developed to be an important part of the community or the society. As said by Walter Rathenau, although a corporation significantly intends to pursue the personal and individual interests and revenues for the owners or the leaders of the corporation they progressively bear the mark of a responsibility and to a growing degree, have consistently assisted the private interest of individuals. Moreover, philosophers such as James H. Tufts and John Dewey, explained in their book ‘Ethics’ published in the year 1908, they promoted the idea that is not adequate to sight the corporations as a virtuous economic machine and that corporations are supposed to be included in the duties and responsibilities of the general public or individuals privately.…