Preview

Glenn Tender's Political Thinking Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2840 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Glenn Tender's Political Thinking Essay Example
Brad Schwartzman
Glenn Tender's Political Thinking

Hans Morgantheau, one of the foremost thinkers in political science believed that politics and government is the perpetual struggle for power. The famous political theorist Thucydides agreed when he said, the "strong will do what they want, the weak will do what the must." Are they right? Is the goal of all humans to seek power in order to dictate their own ideologies and beliefs? I would agree that the tumultuous and evolutionary system that we live in can be broken down into a simplistic belief. However, in order to answer these questions we must first clear away all the idealistic and political debris that surrounds them and uncover the root of human existence. Only then can we attribute all of one's actions and emotions to a single concrete ideal. Once the nature of humanity is discovered, different components of the political structure such as freedom, equality and order can be better understood.
The nature of a human being can be best defined in terms of its "essence." Glenn Tinder, professor of political science and author of Political Thinking asserts that the "essence" of an individual is one's "innermost" or "basic" self (26). If one acts in a manner unbefitting of what they consider themselves, the behavior they are referring to is engrained in one's "essence." It is what makes humans what they are, the core of their being, what defines them as a person. Next, it must be established whether humans are united or "estranged" in their essence. "Estrangement" encompasses all forms of disunity among human beings. Examples from Tinder include war among nations and classes, personal alienation and other human emotions such as hatred, isolation and apathy (23).
Thomas Hobbes, the famous English philosopher advocated that humans are estranged. Morgantheau would agree with Hobbes' assertion that the natural state of man is one of conflict. Without a strong government to guide its citizens,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In your initial post of at least 200-250 words, analyze how the U.S. Constitution implements separation of powers and checks and balances. Briefly explain why the constitutional framers based the new government on these ideas. Evaluate how separation of powers and checks and balances are working out in practice, today, justifying your assessment with persuasive reasoning and examples.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    american polit essay

    • 1393 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After they won the revolutionary war, the newly independent colonies had a new kind of battle ahead of them, setting up a new government to unite under. Their first attempt was the Articles of Confederation. This plan gave a lot of power to the states and did not set up a strong central government. It ultimately failed which caused the framers to hold another Continental Congress to decide on a new way to set up the government. From this was born our great Constitution.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher of the 1600’s that tried to create a basis for politics. Having experienced the English civil war, Hobbes realized that the conflict was the result of human nature. Hobbes exclaimed that the world was full of greedy people and those who are selfless and care only for themselves. Without the government to maintain order, Hobbes said that there would be “a condition of war of everyone against everyone”. Hobbes noted that in order to stop this, the people would have to sacrifice their freedom for the government. In exchange, they gained law and order. He also notes that this sacrifice would allow the government to suppress any form of rebellion. Hobbes called this agreement the social contract.…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, an Enlightenment philosopher, claimed that mankind is naturally evil and selfish and will cause conflicts “if any two men desire the same thing, which they nevertheless cannot both enjoy” or have differing opinions, in order to gain more power so that they can freely pursue their selfish desires, especially “during the time men live without a common power” and “in that condition which is called war, every man against every man,” and are therefore incapable of self-governing. Hobbes’ position on human nature is easily observable; intolerance and bigotry causes violence and general public…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 18

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hobbes.
Thomas Hobbes. (1588-1679). ‘Born premature when mother heard of oncoming Armada.’ At 40, he took Euclid’s geometry as starting point to make mechanical model of universe (man and society). Mechanism (based on motion) was to greatly influence thinking over next few centuries. Witness to upheaval of civil war in England in 1640s. Fled to France. 1651. Publishes "Leviathan.”Hobbes sees state of nature sans government as "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." Promulgates absolute monarch thesis. Says people (wholly selfish) should escape chaos of everyday life, give up their freedom to ruler who guarantees peace and order. In his state Hobbes saw ruler as absolute with men having no right to rebel since this would break the social contract and be illogical.…

    • 1729 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mankind can never be at peace because of the violence that is going on in the world. It doesn’t have to be several people but only one person that can ruin it for everyone. For instance, not everyone has the same thoughts as everyone else. Many people can disagree on little things and make them big things and start using violence to try and settle conflicts. Violence is the thing that ruins the world by not being at peace. This is an example of Hobbes because he believed that people can act on their evil impulse. Ralph is an example of Locke because he is respectful to others by not treating them badly, but treating them equally.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes’s perspective is the opposite extreme of what John Locke stood for. He characterized the natural state of people as that of a state of, “war of every man against every man.” He also portrays all men as being equal, but equal in the sense that anyone can kill anyone else, and as a result of this, they live in constant fear and anxiety. He argues that man uses logic to deduce that the only reasonable way to protect one’s life is to gain enough power to control a state and to protect those who live under that particular state, gaining allies (which eliminates enemies in the process).…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Politics is power. As one of the United State founding fathers James Madison said, “The Essence…

    • 2318 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The economy during the late 1800's was not going in favor of the farmers. The Sherman Silver Act and the McKinley tariff were taking hard hits on the poor, both increasing demands on bigger money supply and demanding more money on imports. Farmers from the South and West became desperate and started calling for measures that would benefit them and decrease the power of the elite. From the years 1890-1896 the Populist Party grew out of farmers' demands for the greater good of the people starting with the Omaha Platform, and fell do to their fusion with the silver democrats in the 1896 elections.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were to philosophers with opposing opinions on human nature and the state of nature. Locke saw humanity and life with optimism and community, whereas Hobbes only thought of humans as being capable of living a more violent, self-interested lifestyle which would lead to civil unrest. However, both can agree that in order for either way of life to achieve success there must be a sovereign.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument presented by Thomas Hobbes in chapter 13 of Leviathan, is that the state of nature is a state of war of all against all. Such a view had previously been discussed- earlier versions of the argument appear in other significant works- however it is Hobbes account of a state in “continuall feare of danger and violent death”1 upon which I will focus on and critique in this essay. There are many reasons why many seem to regard Hobbes argument as the most accurate portrayal of a pre-civilised society, many believe it to be so straightforward and seemingly correct that to object it would be to ignore a necessary truth. Secondly, those who accept Hobbes’ view of a human nature that is so egotistical and unforgiving, would seemingly too agree to the assumption of a gloomy, unbearable state of nature. In this essay I shall argue that such opinions are not logically justified as Hobbes’s argument holds its foundations solidly in assumption alone, an assumption that was heavily moulded on his surroundings of a savage Civil War. Hobbes’s argument lies solely on the grounds that human beings are intrinsically wicked and self-centred beings an argument that cannot be completely validated and therefore cannot be a ‘necessary truth’. Yet despite holding such a bleak outlook on the human condition and its simple invalidity the work of Thomas Hobbes still shapes the political word today2 and it continues to impact our understanding of human nature and interactions. In order to justify my critique of Hobbes I will begin by presenting both his original argument and a brief view of some modern interpretations before cross examining their conclusions against that of other social contract theorist such as Locke and Rousseau as well as rational logic to present the argument that the state of nature is most certainly not a state of war of all against all.…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Hobbes, a British philosopher also known as an egoist due to his belief of what he thought of humans. Hobbes has the belief, "that humans are selfish by nature and only come into some form of civil agreement because we fear what might happen to each other if we were free to indulge our selfish instincts." The meaning behind Hobbes State of Nature is stated, "If you take away that authority, then you take away all incentive to be good". In other words, Hobbes' has the belief that we as people have questionable or to no responsibility and selflessness about our own selves to conduct peace or civility without authority. As to what Hobbes stated about selfishness I do agree, because in today's society and well before our day and age which I am sure it still existed, that…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bossuet And Thomas Hobbes

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An absolute monarchy is when a single ruler has complete authority. There may still be a system of government in place but the absolute monarch would have complete dominance over the whole of it. To gain complete control monarchs had to reduce the power of all other institutions, especially the nobility. Absolutism is not virtuous but suited the needs of the people and territories at the time. Thomas Hobbes, author of Leviathan, believes that men naturally want war with everyone who is not themselves.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this document I will show the philosophy of Thomas Hobbes and why I disagree with most of his views on religion, leadership and people.…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I think that through all of the revolutions it was something like a chain reaction. One country had problems and the people decided to take action and do something about it. They revolted and made things better or worse for themselves. Through this other countries heard about it or saw it first hand, giving them the same ideas to so the same when it times became hard. I think when wars between competing European countries took place and the end result was something that the people in that area of the change didn't like is what cause many revolts.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays