Preview

Julius Caesar Argument Paragraph Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
388 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Julius Caesar Argument Paragraph Essay Example
Argument Paragraph 2

Decius convinces Caesar to come to the senate, by telling Caesar that the dream was noble not a tragedy. As Calphurnia has a dream of what she thinks is horrible, Decius convinces Caesar that the dream was all a misinterpretation, it was a dream of how noble Caesar is, not tragic. The ides of March has come, and Calphurnia has a dream of what she thinks is tragic. Caesar tells Decius what happens and that he will be staying home Act 2 Scene 2 Line 76-82 “She dreamt tonight she saw my statue, Which, like a fountain with an hundred spouts, Did run pure blood; and many lusty Romans Came smiling, and did bathe there hands in it; and on her knee hath begg'd that I will stay at home today.” The quatation is the explination of the dream Calphurnia had, as told by Caeser to Decius. Decius trys to say that this was a noble dream not a tragic one. The dream the Calphurnia had, she thought it was a dream of hate towards Caesar. Instead Decius changed the story and said it wasn't a tragedy about Caesar, it was a noble dream of victory for Caesar. Decius is one of the one of the murderers of Caesar and that's the reason why he changed the dream to something that Caesar would enjoy hearing, and maybe even change his mind Act 2 Scene 2 Line 83-90 “This dream is amiss interpreted; It was a vision fair and fortunate... Signifies that from you great Rome shall suck reviving blood, and that great men shall press... This by Calphurnia's dream is signified.” That quatation dignifys that Decius needs Caesar to come to the senate house or else the murder will never happen. Decius lures him in with great ease on his part, all he did was change the way the dream Calphurnia had into something nobler then what she thought of it. If Caesar chose not to go to the Senate house, then none of this would have happened until they planned another attack. Caesar is convinced to come to the Senate, by the way Decius changed the dream into something noble towards

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1.Why do Octavius and Mark Antony want to engage in a battle with Brutus and Cassius?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    anyone to find justification in the assassination of their emperor. Now, in Antony’s speech he…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You are to produce a contribution to an online HSC Tutorial. You are to record and upload an answer to the question below. It is to be no longer than seven minutes and no less than five minutes.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Soon after the last breaths of one of Rome’s most popular general, Julius Caesar, Antony and Brutus were speaking in front of the people of Rome. Both cunning leaders were nimble in the art of persuasion and manipulation. The beloved leaders used the Ethos, Pathos, and Logos methods of persuasion to sway the crowd to his respective view of the actions of the night and their former general Julius Caesar.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    devices in order to persuade Brutus, a senator and friend of Caesar, that Caesar is…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All texts are deliberately constructed to convey an agenda and a set of values. This means that every composer has a purpose, which is based on the issues arising from their context and audience. To that end, the composer uses conflicting perspectives as a vehicle for successfully conveying their purpose to the audience. So, through the representation of events, personalities and situations (which utilises form, language and structural devices), the responder is positioned to accept the perspective that the composer has represented as valid or credible. As a consequence, the composer is able to successfully impart their values to the audience. Examples of conflicting perspectives in society and the media come in the form of William Shakespeare’s…

    • 987 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As a tragic hero Brutus possesses a flaw of naivety. Brutus is too trusting in others, such as the conspirators. The conspirators believed that Caesar was too ambitious and that they should kill him for the good of Rome, themselves and for their own personal benefit. Brutus trusted that they were conspiring to kill him for the sake of Rome. (Quote). He was also naïve by letting Antony speak at Caesar’s funeral. Brutus believed that Antony would praise Caesar at his funeral and follow the rules that he was given. Brutus trusted him and by letting him speak Antony turned all the Romans against him. Antony sparked a civil war by convincing the Romans that the conspirators that they did wrong. Since Antony turned all the Romans against him, he…

    • 161 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A highly-regarded politician and conspirator in ancient Rome, Brutus, in his funerary speech to Julius Caesar, effectively claims that the conspiracy killing of Caesar is justified. First, he supports this claim by asserting that if Caesar was still alive, he would eventually force the people of Rome to act like his slaves, like a true dictator. Brutus uses a rhetorical question to appeal to logos when stating, “Had you rather Caesar were living and die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men? (Shakespeare). This rhetorical question makes the audience think about how their lives would be if Caesar would continue to powerfully reign. Brutus compares them to the slaves of Caesar that work under his authority until death,…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I decided that I should write to you about the events of yesterday, which I believe you have heard by now. Though if you haven’t, yesterday Caesar was killed in an attack orchestrated by Brutus and Cassius. When I heard, I have to admit that I was shocked that Caesar was dead and that Rome would lose the best leader we’ve had. In my opinion, Caesar was a great dictator, who was just trying to help the Roman Empire expand and was trying to make Rome better, so I believe that it’s good that he was killed.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, Decius Brutus and Mark Antony, both Roman Senators, eulogize Julius Caesar, each using a different technique and approach. Brutus, in a somewhat arrogant, to the point, eulogy, attempts to sway the people. He justifies conspiring against Caesar by stating that Caesar's ambition would have hurt Rome. However, in Antony's eulogy, he focuses on Caesar's positive traits, and cunningly disproves Brutus' justification for killing Caesar. The fickle Romans waver between leaders, responding emotionally, rather than intellectually, to the orators.<br><br>Brutus seeks to explain why he conspired against Caesar. He begins his speech with "Romans, countrymen ...", appealing to their consciousness as citizens of Rome, who,…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During Caesars funeral two of his best men gave speeches, Antony and Brutus, they both used ethos, pathos and logos in different ways to win over the crowd. Brutus was in the senate so he was supposed to give great speeches with structure. Antony was a general so he was not as good at giving speeches but was good at pumping up his solders before battle. Which he used to his advantage when speaking to the mourning crowd.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Julius Caesar Thesis

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Gaius Julius Caesar lived from 100- 44 BC and was a prominent person in the last few decades of the Roman Empire. He was skilled as a speaker and writer, an intelligent politician and fantastic general, but he was also very brutal in his chase of selfish goals. These goals were not only having complete power over the Roman republic, but also credit as being a god. Caesar was born in 102 or 100 BCE into the ancient patrician family of the Iulii who claimed ancestry from Aeneas of Troy, one of the mythical founders of Rome, and the goddess Venus, but few members of the family had distinguished themselves in the previous generations. Caesar's father arrived at the praetor-ship, but never won the election for the consulship. The years of his youth…

    • 2140 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the Punic Wars against Carthage, the plebeian smallholders who had to serve in the roman legions found themselves unable to farm their lands, unable to pay their taxes. Ultimately they lost their lands and ended up as the Mob, an impoverished group in Rome, reliant upon handouts. Meanwhile, the rich consolidated their lands into huge, slave-worked estates that made them even richer. This caused profound social, economic and political problems for the Roman state. The upper, political class divided between the Optimates - rich, conservative landowners who wanted nothing to change - and the Populares - senators who saw a need for land reform to ease the troubles of the poor.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays