Preview

Kant & Deontology Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
875 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Kant & Deontology Essay Example
Kant and Deontology
Judy Havens, Claudia Burns, Amber Montalvo, Kimberly Jones
BSHS/332
Audra Stinson
University of Phoenix

When people think of Ethical Theory then the word morals, respect, and honesty seem to come to mind. Kant devised an ethical theory that is broken down into major elements to explain what he believes is ethical for society to believe. This is where the act of good will comes to existence and the nature of a person’s demeanor comes into how he or she decides what is the right or wrong thing to do. When the laws are put into place to help people know what society has decided what is ethical. Next, would be the decision making process of doing what is right or wrong. Looking at personal gain is not morally correct and having no respect for what is right is hard for a person to decide. He or she must have the decision making process developed or taught to ensure successful outcomes in ethical dilemmas. The major elements of Kant’s ethical theory is a person should not use another as a means to satisfy a personal desire and that morality is based on universal rules much like what is referred as the Golden Rule. The principles of Kantianism have hypothetical and categorical imperatives. We have a duty to ourselves and to others and while we have the ability to rationalize, our actions are not always rational. When using another as a means it should be without coercion or lying and the end should be such that they would be willing to being used. Actions requiring the use of deception are wrong and unjust. One does not make false promises. “For Kantians, respect for another person is fundamental. The fact that we are rational is of infinite value: we can plan, choose, and anticipate our future.” (Stairs, 1997. Pg 4). In Kantianism, justice ranks higher than happiness and if the act is not unjust then it is not immoral or wrong.
Kant thought of “good will” as a deed done for wise regulation motives from a purpose of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When looking to Kant’s ethics, we can see two main strands derive from his studies, nameably the Categorical Imperative and the Hypothetical imperative. With regards the Hypothetical Imperative, this can be laid out as ‘doing A to get B’, and so is performing an action in order to gain something else as an end. This contrasts what Kant believes to be moral, the Categorical imperative, set out as ‘do A’, and therefore in principle would suggest that you should not seek reward from our actions but rather treat people as ends in themselves, as a pose to using them as means to an end. This is what Kant refers to as summun bonum, otherwise referred to as ‘goodwill’. According to him, someone of goodwill is not good because of what they achieve or accomplish, but rather because they act out of duty. This is outlined in Kant’s…

    • 2219 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the four deontological systems that we have discussed, I would like to share my thoughts about the Kantian Deontological System. Kantian Ethics is formulated by Immanuel Kant in which he discussed that the nature of duty is based on human reason. For him, human reason, not human nature, can determine what is right and wrong. He also stressed that human desires are not the right measurement for ethics. In addition, Kantian Ethics is known for its two kinds of command or imperative: the hypothetical and categorical imperative. According to Immanuel Kant, hypothetical imperative has conditions and has no value. We do a certain action or decision because we are waiting for something in return or because we are afraid of punishment. On the other…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 103 Final

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1A. According to Kant, good will is the only thing that is absolutely good without qualification. Good will is the only thing that is unconditionally good. Good will is what makes all other good things truly good. Things can be good, but not without qualification. The will is good because the intention itself is good, rather than a desired result or some outside reasoning. All in all it is the honest and unselfish intention of a will.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant approached towards philosophy; he developed “The Categorical Imperative” which is a rule to do what is right. He believed that we shouldn’t lie to one another; he also believed that if we made a promise we should keep that promise. “Kant argues that the moral worth of an action it’s to be judged not by its consequences but by the nature of the maxim or principles…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Good And Evil Casablanca

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believed that our actions must come from a sense of Duty, not because we care for or love one another but because it is our Duty to “respect the Moral Law” (p. 246). Judging the importance of a decision based on whether or not it was following a rule or set of rules is called deontological ethics. He believed that it was not the consequences of the action which were important but the person’s motive carrying out the said action. Many disagree with Kant saying that we must have a foundation to start from, a reason such as love or concern to do what is morally…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant (hereinafter “Kant”) believes that Ethics is categorical and states that our moral duties are not dependent on feelings but on reason. He further states that our moral duties are unconditional, universally valid, and necessary, regardless of the possible consequences or opposition to our inclinations (Pojman and Vaughn 239).…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kant vs. Mill

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Kant claims that there is a right way to determine how to treat other rational beings, as well as themselves. Kant describes this as being the categorical imperative. The categorical imperative states that an individual ought not make an exception for one’s self to act in a way they themselves would not want by other individuals. Kant requires that a person’s maxim should only be acted upon if the action and…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good Will: A will by which we desire to live upright and honorable lives to attain the highest wisdom…

    • 423 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In order to discover what is moral or not, Kant believes that categorical imperative gives reasoning for any sort of action. In order to do so, one must think about the fundamental rule that goes in hand with what the person plans to fulfill in the first place. If a certain act can be applied to others and puts them in that exact situation, then it is moral. One concept of categorical imperative is known as “The Principle of Ends.” This theory describes individuals as worthy and valuable, depicting them as something worth more than a mere object. This pairs with the saying “treat others as you would like to be treated.” On a general status, I believe that this should be the correct thing to do. Concerning Kant, I disagree with his argument…

    • 195 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kant Paper 2

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    maxim and why you could not achieve the purpose or end of the maxim in…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant And Utilitarianism

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Good will according to Kant, is attempting to do the right thing in all situations. Kant believes that in every situation one encounters, there will always be good. I believe that although in some instances, there can be goodness; I also believe that there are certain situations in which only the bad can occur. For example, on the day of the terrorist attack on 9/11 in New York, the terrorist act was not morally correct in anyway. On his prime…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil 3033

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    For an action to be morally right on Kant’s view it must be the right act done for the right reason.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kant's Groundwork

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages

    To start off, a brief explanation of the ‘will’ seems important to understand the concept of a ‘good will’ that is first presented by Kant. A will carries intention to perform an action. When the will is free, it is free to act without regards to inclinations. When the will is good, a ‘good will,’ it makes a commitment to do what is right in any case, free from inclinations, in accordance with duty (duty will be discussed later). Kant starts off Section I of the Groundwork saying, ‘There is nothing that is possible to think of anywhere in the world, indeed even outside it, that can be held to be good without restriction except a good will.’ Here, Kant introduces the ‘good will’ and starts the foundation upon where the rest of Section I will follow. This statement suggests that anything seen as good,…

    • 2358 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Among Immanuel Kant's (1724–1804) most influential contributions to philosophy is his development of the transcendental argument. In Kant's conception, an argument of this kind begins with a compelling premise about our thought, experience, or knowledge, and then reasons to a conclusion that is a substantive and unobvious presupposition and necessary condition of this premise. The crucial steps in this reasoning are claims to the effect that a subconclusion or conclusion is a presupposition and necessary condition of a premise. Such a necessary condition might be a logically necessary condition, but often in Kant's transcendental arguments the condition is necessary in the sense that it is the only possible explanation for the premise, whereupon the necessity might be weaker than logical. Typically, this reasoning is intended to be a priori in some sense, either strict (Smit 1999) or more relaxed (Philip Kitcher 1981, Pereboom 1990). The conclusion of the argument is often directed against skepticism of some sort. For example, Kant's Transcendental Deduction targets Humean skepticism about the applicability of a priori metaphysical concepts, and his Refutation of Idealism takes aim at skepticism about external objects. These two transcendental arguments are found in the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), but such arguments are found throughout Kant's works, for example in the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), in the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790), and in the Opus Posthumum (Förster 1989). A transcendental argument is a deductive philosophical argument which takes a manifest feature of experience as granted, and articulates that which must be the case so that experience as such is possible.[1][2] Transcendental arguments may have additional standards of justification that are more demanding than those of traditional deductive arguments…

    • 2045 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays