In the article “Ethics of Designer Babies” by Sarah Ly states what a designer baby entails. Ly explains that a designer baby is a baby genetically engineered in vitro for specially selected traits, which can vary from lowered disease-risk to gender selection. As a result, designer babies have become an important topic in bioethical debates, and in 2004 the term “designer baby” even became an official…
Thank you for making the decision to come to the Reproductive Specialty Clinic. When considering what you were asking, we wanted to take into account all members involved and how it would impact them. First we considered all the stakeholders; you both as the parents, the child, and the Clinic. We also considered how this may impact future patients and how the future of genetically modifying embryos would be impacted by our decision. When deciding as to whether or not the Reproductive Specialty Clinic would comply with your family’s request and use a deaf embryo for implantation, the ethical framework we used was Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a framework that is based on doing the greatest good for the greatest number of people. You both…
James Gallagher, a health editor for BBC News which is ranked as one of the most objective and credible U.S news sources, constructed an article called “Designer babies' debate should start, scientists say” (January 15, 2015). Within this source, Gallagher claims that leading scientists have told BBC that based on the current progress in the understanding of genetics, society needs to be prepared to come to terms with the ethics that surround the concept. In order to provide foundation for his argument, Gallagher brings up questionably unethical scenarios relating to designer babies, and adds what some scientists that work closely with genetics have to say about the topic. For instance, Gallagher added the opinion of Dr. Tony Perry, a professor…
My thoughts on designer babies is that it is a wonderful thing to research, but now it's crossing the line. It's amazing how we can take DNA and change it to what we like it to become, but this is someone’s life you are changing. Not only this, but this is now a rather large debate going on about this. Whether or not this practice is palatable or not. It's important to research and make amazing discoveries, but putting someone's life on the line shouldn't be something to put under the…
The term "designer baby" is an informal name given to a baby whose genetic makeup has been altered by means of genetic engineering. This term was originally derived from 'designer clothing ', implying that the baby has been pieced together with desired 'traits ' or characteristics according to the direction of those that hold with them the power to change a baby before it is born. This may be the parents, scientists or doctors. Currently, it is a technology in its early stages, used to screen embryos and select those with desirable traits for implantation into a mother. However, as it slowly advances and possibilities begin to reveal themselves, parties for and against have rallied about the moral rights…
When the topic of designer babies is presented, there is a multitude of ethical reasons that arise; one important concept is the questioning of how safe it is. The side effects of such a process are still unknown. Although the transfer of the DNA could be successful, there is a great possibility of a reshuffling of the entire genome. Assuming that the transfer and selectivity is completely safe, can it truly be considered…
The designer children will be healthy, after use that technology, all babies will have a better childhood and more opportunity in the future.…
I declare that this assignment is my own work, which all sources of reference are acknowledged in full and it has not been submitted for any other course.…
Altering an egg cell in order to create a healthy baby is a very controversial issue. Physically separating an unhealthy egg and transferring the DNA to a healthy donor seems like a positive thought. On one hand, it seems very helpful for an unhealthy mother, but there may be many underlying problems. The ethical issues, along with possible legal ramifications, evolutionary impacts and regulation pose possible concerns. For example, who should have the authority to make such a decision in the first place? If this is allowed, what will the future hold with this type of technology and ability? Since a donor egg is involved, how would legal custody be determined over the child that is born? Will a child produced from this have problems later in their life? There are many questions that are brought up when this issue is discussed, and they need to be addressed.…
To start off, considering a family does choose to genetically modify and separate a child from the true family line of genes can have really bad risks. The procedure in which designer babies are made outside the mother's stomach like stated before the main questions for this is "Is the baby getting enough food and nutrients?" Although, that is not the only risk. Just putting the genes inside is a risk...The embryo inside can pop causing the baby to die. On the other hand this can be justified, all birth can lead to a miscarriage natural or not. Having a designer baby or natural baby, both children will get the same kind of care to make it out safely.…
There are many ways in which Designer Babies can benefit the baby and it's future. All the studies and all the benefits support the claim that Designer Babies is a good thing. This matters because of how this idea could impact the future of all humans, just a few examples could be: humans would all be smarter, healthier, and live longer. The only way this can be achieved is if people realize how much Designer Babies can really benefit mankind. People must realize all of the benefits that come with Designer Babies, notice how this could actually save lives, and benefit the human race for the future and years to…
You stated a valid point Gracela that healthcare providers and companies might use genetic engineering such as Preimplantation Genetic disorder (PGD) for profit instead of what is ethically and morally appropriate. People have a different point of views over the legal and moral status of embryos and the nonexistence of regulation in the USA makes us a breeding ground for reproductive tourism for patients coming from other countries with stricter guidelines on the use of PGD (Bayefsky, 2017). Totally agree with you that a policy is needed, and definitely, an intense argument will ensue on how to resolve this kind of ethical dilemma if the US legislators decided to regulate…
A designer baby is defined in the dictionary to be “a baby developing from an embryo created in-vitro fertilisation and selected because it had or lacked particular genes, the genetic makeup often having been modified by genetic engineering.” This term is simply referring to the newly scientific developed process providing a chance that would enable parents to genetically modify their child whilst it is still in the form of an embryo. The overall idea on this topic that is being raised at this present moment is the discussion of whether or not to permit people to determine their children’s genes, which would help immensely in lowering the risks of various diseases. The positives are endless for it may help parents rid a hereditary disease, or provide chance for saving a child that may need a bone marrow transfer, to the less extreme ideas of being able to determine the sex of your child as well as the colour of their eyes and hair. Although despite the positives there are various negatives that need to be taken into perspective and be properly analysed. The three major categories for the negatives are the moral and ethical, social, and health concerns. The controversy on the issue is considering all possible factors that can occur if they give the go on ‘designer babies’ in Australia, not only do they have the positives and negatives in front of them but some evidence and real life results that will help them reach a concise conclusion.…
This concept is no longer something that we read in science fiction novels. This is the new reality. Over time, there have been even more advancements involving pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, and being able to create the appearance of your child is one of them. The term used for these genetically engineered children is “designer babies”. It is the concept that in the near future parents will be able to select the nonmedical traits in their children. This includes gender, hair color, skin tone, intelligence, athletic ability, etc. Parents can literally design their child using physical and mental traits. If this becomes true, what type of society will we be living live in? This might seem like a harmless idea, but the truth is where do we draw the line? Being able to design your own child gives humans the power to play the part of God. Although the idea of being able to design your own child has its advantages, in the long run it could cause some very devastating effects.…
Working with science, implanting genes, and giving parents their “dream child” can be more difficult and turn into controversy like Atwood says in her novel. While merging chemicals, something good can instantly turn bad. A gene that scientists are using for designer babies is called NR2B which is for intelligence. On the other hand NR2B can be affected with the body not being able to fight off illnesses or heal itself (“Genetics”). Also, the screening method was started so doctors could tell on the ultra sound if the baby would have a defect and the parents could choose what they wanted to do, but not every test can be true.…