Reproductive Specialty Clinic Case Study

Thank you for making the decision to come to the Reproductive Specialty Clinic. When considering what you were asking, we wanted to take into account all members involved and how it would impact them. First we considered all the stakeholders; you both as the parents, the child, and the Clinic. We also considered how this may impact future patients and how the future of genetically modifying embryos would be impacted by our decision. When deciding as to whether or not the Reproductive Specialty Clinic would comply with your family’s request and use a deaf embryo for implantation, the ethical framework we used was Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a framework that is based on doing the greatest good for the greatest number of people. You both
Does it stop here or next do we start genetically modifying embryos so they are taller or smarter or faster. If genetic modifying is used too freely, many problems can arise. In some countries, couples may start to use it to select a certain gender, leading to an extremely uneven gender balance. The ethical side of this is that society strides for a “perfect society” and “perfect babies” and by genetically modifying babies it shows society’s intolerant attitude for the disabled. The disabled greatly resent the fact that people would genetically modify their child to fit society’s view. Society may feel that a deaf person may not led as fulfilling of a life as a hearing person. The disabled community is completely against this view. As it is, deaf students are a lot less likely than blind students to attempt to overcome their respective disability. The deaf students embrace their disability and immerse themselves into their surrounding and supportive community. Someone who is not a part of the deaf community cannot understand the deaf culture. This clinic believes that a hearing person is incapable of seeing this from a deaf persons perspective, while a deaf person is unable to see this from a hearing persons