Preview

‘Events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 Played a Greater Part in Causing War in 1939 Then Did the Nazi Soviet Pact.’ How Far Do You Agree? Explain Your Answer.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘Events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 Played a Greater Part in Causing War in 1939 Then Did the Nazi Soviet Pact.’ How Far Do You Agree? Explain Your Answer.
‘Events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 played a greater part in causing war in 1939 then did the Nazi soviet pact.’ How far do you agree? Explain your answer.

Ultimately, the events in Czechoslovakia in 1938-1939 played a major role in contributing to the outbreak of world war 2 as it ended the appeasement policy and led to Britain’s realization that war was the only solution. However, the nazi soviet pact is also a factor as it gave germany the confidence to invade Poland, a move that guaranteed war. After the anschluss, Czechoslovakia was next on hitler’s list of expansion. The Czech government felt threatened, and sought support from Britain and france should Hitler invade Czechoslovakia, and both Britain and france felt bound to help them. On 15 september 1938, Hitler told chamberlain that he would risk war to bring the Sudeten germans into germany. Chamberlain found his demands reasonable, and decided that areas in which more than half the population was germans should be handed over to Hitler. However on 22 sep Hitler stepped his demands and asked for the whole of Sudetenland. Originally, chamberlain rejected his demands. Eventually, in an attempt to avoid war, he, along with Mussolini and the prime minister of france decided that Sudetenland would be given to germany. This was known as the munich agreement (29 sep). Czechoslovakia was not consulted, and it had felt betrayed. Following that, Hitler then assured chamberlain that he had no further claims in Europe. However, in march 1939, Hitler took over the rest of Czechoslovakia, showing that he could not be trusted. Following that, Britain and france both abandoned the appeasement policy and announced that it would declare war on germany in event that Hitler invaded Poland. However, the nazi soviet pact was also an extremely important factor as it enabled Hitler to avoid a two frontwar, and allowed him to continue to provoke the western countries as stalin now secured his eastern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    On August 23, 1939, enemies Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed the Nazi-Soviet Non-Aggression Pact, in which the two countries agreed to, take no military action against each other for the next 10 years. By signing this pact, Germany had protected itself from having to fight a two-front war and the Soviet Union was awarded land, including parts of Poland and the Blatic States. Soviet leader Stalin viewed the pact as a way to keep his nation on peaceful terms with Germany, while giving him time to build up the Soviet military, while Hitler used the pact to make sure Germany was able to invade Poland unopposed. Historian Ian Kershaw notes in “Hitler: 1936–1945: Nemesis,” the German chancellor was ecstatic. He congratulated his foreign minister and said the pact “will hit like a bombshell.” Hitler had planned on invading Poland from the start as it would bring lebensraum for the German people. According to Hitler’s plan, the “racially superior” Germans would colonise territory. German expansion had begun with the annexation of Austria in 1938 and continued in 1939 with the occupation of the Sudetenland and then all of Czechoslovakia. Both…

    • 604 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    DBQ 19

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First, Germany had many ways of keeping its people under control. Propaganda was an important factor of keeping Germans under control. Using pictures or teaching students at school he did anything and everything to get people to be against the Jews. In Document 3, it is stated that Hitler promised to end the Treaty of Versailles. Also he sent battalions into the Rhineland’s demilitarized zone to “cast off the last shackles fastened upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles” (Doc.3). Some of Hitler’s ideas are explained in Document 1. Hitler believed Germany would never “have the moral right to enter into colonial politics until, at least, it includes its own sons within a single state” (Doc.1). This means that Hitler thought that Germany would never be able to enter colonial politics until Germany had colonies of its own. He also states that oppressed territories are not reduced back to the common Reich or empire by protests, but by other territories or countries with higher military power. In the Munich Conference, Germany was allowed territory in Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, though many…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    DBQ world war 2

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Actions were taken that moved Europe toward war. The debate over the causes of World War II provides…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Second Front was, according to Philips and Roberts, a major source of tension between the USA, Britain and Russia during World War II. Philips states “To Stalin the need to open up a Second Front in Western Europe against Germany in order to relieve the pressure on the USSR in the East was a pressing necessity. Yet the refusal of Britain and the USA to do so until the time was right led Stalin to be suspicious of their motives.”[1] Roberts backs up Philips’s argument up by pointing out that there had been numerous failed agreements by the Allies to land troops in order to create a Second Front in 1942, and the issue was discussed in the Tehran conference of 1943[2]. However on closer inspection, neither argument is particularly strong. For example, although Philips points out that Russia was at risk of being invaded by Germany in 1941 and therefore had an strong reason for demanding the Second Front despite the fact that defeating Germany was not the USA’s or Britain’s main concern. Churchill was concerned with the risk of casualties a Second Front would create. He also had military interests in North Africa during 1942[3] and Italy during 1943[4] and…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1939, Adolf Hitler was get ready for war. While he was planning to procure Poland without constrain (as he had attached Austria the prior year), Hitler needed to keep the likelihood of a two front war. Hitler understood that…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    18.1) Assess the view that the disagreements about the Second Front were the most significant cause of tension between Russian and the West between 1941 and 1945.…

    • 2180 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin's effects on WW2

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On August 23rd of 1939, Soviet Union ruler Joseph Stalin agreed to sign a non-aggression, or neutrality pact with Adolf Hiter, this prove to have a huge influence on the decisions of the Germans. Part of the non-agression pact was that the Soviets would not come to aid Poland if it was attacked, Stalin agreed. This non-agression pact insured Germany that it would not be fighting on two fronts in the coming war, for signing this pact the Soviet Union was given land that included part of Poland and some Baltic States[1]. Just a couple days before the non-agression pact was signed, Vyacheslav Molotov, the Chairman of the Council of People's in the Soviet Union made an economic agreement with the Germans, agreeing to provide food products and raw materials to Germany in exchange for machinery from Germany, this in combination with the non-agression pact helped Germany bypass the British blockade. These pacts were supposed to last ten years, they only lasted two.…

    • 873 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It can be argued that in order for the Nazi Regime to have stayed in power, it was essential that they maintain high popularity. On the other hand, though popularity is needed, it can be debated that the use of terror was a more important aspect to the regime as it ensured that the German people would not question or speak out against the regimes policy and actions. The view in source four appears to provide the view that the regime was dependant on its popularity and also agrees with the statement provided. However, if you were to compare this with source five then you would see that it gives the impression that the regime depended solely on terror, thus disagreeing with the statement. Furthermore, it would appear that source six provides a balanced view on the subject and to some extent supports both source four and five. It can therefore be debated as to whether or not the Nazi Regime depended more on its broad popularity than on terror in the years 1933-1939.…

    • 1233 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Treaty of Versailles has been said to be the most important, indirect cause of WWII. After Germany was defeated in World War I, they were forced via the Treaty to pay heavy reparations to the victors. Their economy could not take the pressure from the harsh reparations and it quickly fell…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Causes of World War II

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two causes of World War II were the harsh provisions of the Treaty of Versailles that ended World War I and the rise of nationalist leader Adolf Hitler.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Timeline of Holocaust

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Munich Conference: Great Britain and France agree to German occupation of the Sudetenland, previously western Czechoslovakia.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeremiah

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The main causes of World War II were nationalistic tensions, unresolved issues, and resentments resulting from the World War I and the interwar period in Europe, plus the effects of the Great Depression in the 1930s.The culmination of events that led to the outbreak of war are generally understood to be the 1939 invasion of Poland by Germany and Soviet Russia and the 1937 invasion of the Republic of China by the Empire of Japan. These military aggressions were the result of decisions made by the authoritarian ruling Nazi elite in Germany and by the leadership of the Kwantung Army in Japan. World War II started after these aggressive actions were met with an official declaration of war and/or armed resistance.…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays