Thomas Aquinas’ weakest argument is‚ without a doubt‚ the argument from gradation. In Aquinas’ fourth way‚ God is defined as the Absolute Being which‚ in a sense‚ is used as a yardstick for the measurement of all qualities. There is a belief that some things are better than others‚ which can be applied to all things‚ but can it really be applied to everything? Is one rose better than another if equal in age and care? Who determines which one is better? If there were two identical twins‚ is one better
Free Metaphysics Existence Ontology
"Is the Existence of Evil incompatible with the existence of God?" "Without darkness there can be no light (Shestov)." This quote says a lot about our world as we know it. To truly know something we must also know it’s opposite. We would not know silent if there was not sound. There would be no young if we did not know old. So how could we believe that there is a good without an evil? To believe in the existence of a greatest good‚ which we call God‚ there must also be exist a source of evil as
Premium
first ever real science‚ and it served as a springboard for many of the fields studied today‚ such as psychology and traditional science. One of the most primitive and early arguments presented in psychology was the ontological argument: the argument for the existence of a God (Pojman). People wanted to be able to explain the world around them‚ and more importantly people wanted to have direction in their life. The desire for an all powerful being stems from the real desire for a “judgement day”
Premium Metaphysics Philosophy Plato
strengths of the Design Argument for the existence of God The Design Argument can be split into two sides: design qua purpose and design qua regularity. The key idea of design qua purpose comes from William Paley. He used analogy as the basis for his argument‚ noting how the complex design of a watch allows all the parts to work together perfectly to achieve its purpose. He then noted the complexity‚ order and purpose of the universe‚ stating that "every manifestation on design‚ which existed in the watch
Premium Charles Darwin Universe Teleological argument
Arguments for God’s Existence • Cosmological Argument: Every effect has a cause. The Universe exists and since something cannot come from nothing‚ then God exists. • Theological Argument: Since the universe is ordered and has a useful arrangement then‚ the universe must have a free and intelligent cause. • Anthropological Argument: Since man was created in the image of God‚ he possesses characteristics of God. A blind force could never create man. • Moral Argument: Man has a sense of Morality or
Premium Existence Metaphysics God
is no God if he cannot help us by preventing evil. The argument of evil basically states that God and evil cannot coincide. There are two types of evil; moral‚ which is carried out by humans through immoral actions that cause pain and suffering such as murder‚ rape and so forth. Natural evil is the second type which occurs through inevitable phenomenon’s such as natural disasters; hurricanes‚ tsunamis and diseases are a few (Sober‚ 120). The argument from evil is a deductively valid argument and states
Premium God Problem of evil Good and evil
Why is there something instead of nothing? This is the question that humans have tried to answer since the beginning of our existence. Why are we here and what purpose do we have? There are many arguments and theories proposed about this topic. The unattainable debate of whether God really exists or not will always be a controversial topic‚ this essay aims to prove that we do not have the mental capacity to prove that God does or does not exist. This essay will present evidence from both sides of
Premium Metaphysics Existence God
Philosophy‚ Descartes discusses the existence of God. Descartes believes in God and provides two arguments that support his theory. His supporting evidence is that he possess a clear idea of God and second that any cause must be at least as great as it effect. Descartes convinces the reader hat he believes in God‚ but not that God exist. Descartes’ argument fails to be completely convincing because he assumes all people possess the same innate ideas about God and a cause isn’t always as great as
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Epistemology
Descartes: Proofs of God/Deception and Error Instructions: First: Analyze and evaluate the two proofs of God’s existence. How are they different? Is one more convincing than the other? Why did Descartes think he needed two proofs? Do they do different work for him? And secondly: Does Descartes give a satisfactory account of human error‚ given a perfect and divine creator? Are Descartes’ arguments convincing‚ or does it still seem unnecessary and less than perfect that God created us with
Premium Omnipotence God Theology
In “Who Are You Animal Rights Activists Anyway?” by Tom Regan‚ he was telling the general public about the views of animal rights activists. Regan has written several essays on animal rights and is recognized as a key intellectual leader of the animal rights movement and has also written several books on the subject which makes him very credible in his writings. Regan’s argument is one of change‚ he’s trying to get us to change our views and persuade us that not all animal right activists are extremists
Premium Animal rights Tom Regan