cause harm could be castastrophic (“Dual Use Research: A Dialogue”). Dual use research is a growing concern that has the scientific community and the public frequently discussing the potential harm a research could bring if one intends to use the information improperly‚ in turn‚ potentially turn the information around to cause harm (Biotechnology and the Law 367). The risk that many individuals are concerned about is the intentional and calculated use of the research information to do harm to national
Premium Bacteria Antibiotic resistance Gene
This paper will illustrate the treatment outcome models of recidivism‚ relapse‚ and harm-reduction. Secondly‚ it will provide information on the similarities and differences of these three treatment outcome models‚ which will help define treatment success and failure in forensic setting for 28-year-old Sandra Lee. Thirdly‚ in this paper‚ challenges and advantages of these treatment outcomes will be explained. Fourthly‚ it focus on the article‚ “Guilt and shame as predictors of recidivism: A longitudinal
Premium Crime Prison Addiction
believes in this theory because he thinks that if someone has done harm to another person than doing harm to the criminal is only natural. Michael Levin said “I am advocating torture as an acceptable measure for preventing future evils.” What he means by this is that‚ by showing people that others have been through the death penalty it gives the public the thought in the back of their minds saying that‚ if I do harm to a person‚ harm will be done to me. I would have to agree and also disagree
Premium Capital punishment Torture Amnesty International
gigantic dog that greets unsuspecting people by jumping on them? Yeah‚ that one. There are many things that could go wrong with jumping dogs‚ but these things can be prevented with proper training. Jump-control training in dogs is important for preventing harm to guests‚ maintaining a calm‚ stable environment‚ and preventing misconceptions about aggression. Some dogs have a tendency
Premium Dog Dog breed Pet
Chapter 1 Morality – the standards that an individual or a group has about what is right and wrong or good and evil. Moral Standards – the norms about the kinds of actions believed to be morally right and wrong as well as the values placed on what we believe to be morally good and morally bad. Nonmoral Standards – the standards by which we judge what is good or bad and right or wrong in a nonmoral way. “Conventional” standards and norms include the standards of etiquette by which we judge people’s
Premium Morality Ethics
absolutist form of pacifism centres on the viewpoint that each individual has some absolute right not to be killed‚ and that war inevitably kills those who have failed to do anything to lose that right. Therefore‚ these individuals are not liable to any harm leading to the aforementioned conclusion regarding the impermissibility of all war. Absolute pacifism‚ although noble in its intent‚ has been successfully been argued to be morally untenable. In more recent times‚ a new pacifist theory has emerged
Premium United States Laws of war Iraq War
Association (APA) and British Psychological Society (BSP): Informed consent must be obtained from the participants (APA Standard 3.10 & 8.02 / BPS Ethical Principle 1.3) Intentional deception must be avoided (APA Standard 8.07 / BPS Ethical Principle 1.3) Harm must not come to the participants (APA Standard 3.04 / BPS Ethical Principle 3.3) Participants should be debriefed at the end of their participation (APA Standard 8.08 / BPS Ethical Principle 3.4) (a) Discuss the extent to which the Asch experiment
Premium Ethics Psychology Philosophy
examining liberty‚ the harm principle‚ and the inherent worth of individuality‚ Mill offers a persuasive picture of actual freedom. He promotes the notion that diversity and the rejection of repressive standards are linked. This essay evaluates Mill’s philosophical framework by analyzing key passages from "On Liberty‚" including his opinions on liberty‚ the application of the harm principle‚ and the importance of individuality. People
Premium
Why is inflicting no harm to participants an important ethical issue when performing social research? Describe the importance of no harm to participants as an ethical issue. Give examples to illustrate the difficulties with this issue. Examples from the book that had difficulties with ethics include the Milgram experiment‚ the Stanford Prison experiment‚ and the syphilis experiment. These experiments were done in the name of science but had a lasting impact on the participants. In the
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
duty of care to their employees (Chapter 12) ! Reasonable foreseeability ! - To establish the existence of a duty of care‚ it must be shown that at the time of the incident it was reasonably foreseeable that the defendant’s conduct could cause harm to someone in the plaintiff’s position. According to Lord Atkin in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562‚ at 580. ! ! “You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour
Premium Tort law Duty of care Tort