PepsiCo Inc.‚ profitability ratios | | | Dec 29‚ 2012 | Dec 31‚ 2011 | Dec 25‚ 2010 | Dec 26‚ 2009 | Dec 27‚ 2008 | Return on Sales | | Gross profit margin | 52.22% | 52.49% | 54.05% | 53.51% | 52.95% | Operating profit margin | 13.91% | 14.48% | 14.41% | 18.61% | 16.09% | Net profit margin | 9.43% | 9.69% | 10.93% | 13.75% | 11.89% | Return on Investment | | | | | | Return on equity (ROE) | 27.71% | 31.29% | 29.86% | 35.38% | 42.47% | Return on assets (ROA) | 8.28%
Premium Pepsi
Coca-Cola Company Memo To: From: Date: Re: SEC Project –Coca-Cola Company Purpose: The purpose of this SEC project is not only to understand the accounting concepts deeply by analyzing a company’s reports. We have made the answers to questions regarding Coca-Cola Company’s annual financial report and proxy statement. Meanwhile‚ we also analyzed the information composed in the report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission‚ in detail‚ and we have confidence in being able to employ
Premium Balance sheet
COMPANY CASE BRITIVIC : CREATING A BRAND FLAVOUR Selected britvic brand : Questions for discussion: 1. core benefit of pepsi : A drink for refreshment without alcohol. Actual product of pepsi: • brand name: pepsi • quality level: excellent • design n packaging: regular (275ml)‚ disposable (500ml)‚ can (300ml)‚ regular (1 liter)‚ disposable (1.5 liter)‚ jumbo (2.5liter). • features : black colour with
Premium Coca-Cola Brand management Logo
1st of December 2006 Coca-Cola Amatil had historically been with a Global TMC for 10 years. In 2005 CCA decided to go to market for a new TMC as the service levels with BTI had continually declined. This was due to several key personnel leaving the TMC‚ as well as the ‘current’ OBE being turned off. The replacement OBE fell well short of satisfactory service level standards. Examples of the criteria CCA considered in nominating a new TMC as part of the tender process included: new booking technology
Premium Technology
India History Background Coke and Pepsi Learn to Compete in India Case Summary Indian softdrinks Market Six product segments-Economic crisis of 1991 leaving consumers with little choice of brands -1986 “Pepsi Foods Ltd.” “Lehar Pepsi” -1990 Coca-Cola Reenters market with joint venture “Britco Foods” -Later partner with Parle Advertising Pepsi and Coke sponsor TV campaigns‚ Urban Youth‚ Cultural Festivals and Sports Fans. Both Pepsi and Coke look to expand into other markets (fruit juices‚ bottled
Premium Pepsi Coca-Cola Cola
Coca Cola Analysis 2. Coke’s strategy and structure before Daft Leadership - The structure was more centralized in the model of command and control with all the instructions and decisions‚ Atlanta - ‘Concentrate on Concentrate’ strategy - the high cost operations (trucks purchases‚ product delivery‚ and execution of local marketing) is left to worldwide bottlers. - Consolidation of the vast bottling network into 10 anchors bottlers. - Strategy‚ expansion of market share
Free Decision making Marketing Risk
The Coca-Cola Company is an American multinational beverage corporation and manufacturer‚ retailer and marketer of non-alcoholic beverage concentrates and syrups and one of the most highly recognized soft drink brands in the world.(1) The company is best known for its flagship product Coca-Cola‚ invented in 1886 by pharmacist John S. Pemberton in Columbus‚ Georgia. (2) The Coca-Cola formula and brand was bought in 1889 by Asa Candler (co-founder of Coca-Cola) who incorporated The Coca-Cola Company
Premium Management Learning German language
1. Why do you think Coca-Cola has had one ethical issue after another over the last decade or so? Ethical issues have been a problem for Coca-Cola because the company has lacked quality leadership in many areas of the organization. It seems that the company was not prepared to handle disputes or incidents when they occurred. They were slow to respond in many incidents because they were ill equipped to handle the fall out. They essentially had no crisis management skills. It seems that
Premium Coca-Cola Ethics Caffeine
Rahimafrooz Launches “BOOMS COLA” North South University Course: MKT202 Semester: Summer 2012 Section: 03 Submitted By AVENGERS Name: ID: Rakib-Uz-Zaman 1210616030 Diponkar Kumar Saha 1210511030 Ridwan Haider Khandkar 1210493030 Ullash Kumar Roy
Premium Coca-Cola Marketing
foreign colas boycott and pesticide allengations). Though most of the factors in the political environment are unpredictable and existed within the macroenvironment‚ steps could have been taken to anticipate and minimize the impact of the political risks. Coca-Cola could have worked with local partners and the host government. As “political sensitivity to foreign influences can be catastrophic – often driven by perception and not reality” (William Nobrega 2008) in India‚ PepsiCo and Coca-Cola could
Premium Coca-Cola Cola Marketing