Topic No 3: The Logical Framework Revisited Course Lecturer: George M. Onyango February‚ 2013 MASENO UNIVERSITY 1 http://ecampus.maseno.ac.ke/ PPM 859: Participatory learning and Action I Participation in Project Development 1. Introduction In the introductory course mention has been made of the Logical Framework. In this course we revisit the topic to be able to position it within the overall framework of M&E principles. This topic provides an overview of the Logical Framework approach
Premium Project management
widely accepted by our society‚ philosophers or more specifically logical positivists would argue against the simplicity of language. According to the man who pioneered the logical positivist movement‚ Ludwig Wittgenstein‚ “Language is a part of our organism and no less complicated than it” (Wittgenstein). But first‚ we must have an understanding of what logical positivism is and what this school of philosophy believes. Logical positivists’ view is solely based on something called verification
Premium Philosophy of language Empiricism Positivism
Logical fallacies are common errors found in an argument that are used to undermine reasoning based on logic. Its main purpose is to dupe readers into believing that the use of seemingly‚ factual information can be taken as correct information. This week’s reading provides many examples of logical fallacies including: equivocation‚ non-sequitur and a red herring. Equivocation is using half-truths to claim that your logic is correct. The use of vocabulary is essential in equivocation because those
Premium Critical thinking Argumentation theory Fallacy
humans‚ we have two cognitive operating capacities: logical and emotional. Our logical brains are able to deduce outcomes‚ while our emotional side is selfish and convolutes information‚ from a self-centered standpoint‚ referencing both Congregatio and Regretio Ego factors (and yes‚ there are two Egos‚ because Freud was only partially correct – the man understood others‚ but true psychology manifests when one deeply understands themselves‚ without excuses). The chemical reactions of our brains
Premium Psychology Emotion Reasoning
“Not so fast!”‚ one might say. The sorts of Biological Conventions I described might well be necessary for Logical Conventionalism‚ but they do not entail it. In fact‚ we do not even have a story about how possibly Biological Conventions (i.e.‚ biological rules for the assignment of meanings to logical idioms) can make Logical Conventionalism (i.e. a thesis about the truth-makers of logical sentences) true. Don’t we need a story of how could it be true‚ to conclude that the case against it is not
Premium Scientific method Mind Science
John Smith Logical Fallacies “I’m not ashamed to admit that I’m a Christian‚ but you don’t need to be in the pew every Sunday to know there’s something wrong in this country when gays can serve openly in the military but our kids can’t openly celebrate Christmas or pray in school. As president‚ I’ll end Obama’s war on religion. And I’ll fight against liberal attacks on our religious heritage.” -Rick Perry; Texas Governor Tenety‚ Elizabeth. "Rick Perry Ad: ‘I’ll End Obama’s War on Religion’
Premium George W. Bush Fallacy Critical thinking
Homework: Problem # 2‚ page 194: Logical Fallacies 2a) the electron could not have been fair – I do not know anyone who voted for the winner. Logical flaw: inadequate sampling Comment: this statement concludes based on insufficient evidence. Just because I do not know anyone who voted for winner‚ do not necessarily outlaw the fairness of the election. Before reaching any valid conclusion‚ I have to collect some data and evidence from other news sources and compare with my findings
Premium Voting Elections Election
The logical fallacies that I have chosen to study in this paper are "Appeal to Emotion" Fallacy‚ "Common Belief" Fallacy‚ and the "Hypothesis Contrary to Fact" fallacy. In the following paragraphs I will be defining the fallacies and how they relate to critical thinking. I will also be providing a popular culture example for each fallacy to illustrate each fallacy. In conclusion I shall attempt to provide Pro ’s and Con ’s for each Fallacy. The first Fallacy I chose was the "Appeal to Emotion"
Premium Trinity Critical thinking Jesus
Logical Fallacies In an argumentative essay‚ the writer attempts to persuade the reader through the logic or rationality of her argument. If the writer’s essay is based on emotions or feelings‚ or if the rational thought is flawed (and therefore not rational)‚ the argument loses its strength. Below is a list of logical errors commonly made by students in argumentative essays: Hasty Generalization: Jumping to conclusions. All required university courses are boring. Solution: Avoid words like "everybody"
Premium Logic Causality Fallacy
How is logical symbolic thought and language encoded in the brain? A possibility is that the language centers in the STS (superior temporal sulcus)‚ parietal association cortex‚ and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex communicate with one another during logical brain operations involving symbolic thought. The superior tempral sulcus‚ both anterior and posterior‚ plays some roles in social cognition and self concept. It also helps process speech and reading signals. It clearly plays a role in human
Premium Psychology Cognition Mind