Locke and Rene Descartes were two of the most influential philosophers of the 17th century. The two of them both sought answers to aid them in understanding things about knowledge‚ such as how we attain it and what exactly it is‚ and they also had differing opinions about whether or not there was absolute certainty in knowledge. Although it can be said that the philosophies of Locke and Descartes were different‚ I believe that they have a few things in common. Both Locke and Descartes definitions
Premium Morality Ethics Philosophy
rainbow‚ smell the aroma of a fresh batch of cookies‚ taste the pungent flavors of chili peppers‚ and physically touch the ground on which we at least perceive we are standing. Descartes presents a dream argument that the senses are deceitful and one cannot distinguish between dream and reality. First I shall dive into Descartes’ dream argument‚ then present Hetherington’s two ways of challenging the dream argument‚ and then finally provide my own viewpoint. The dream argument for skepticism is possible;
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Truth
The logic behind Descartes’ second premise can be explained thus‚ he says a cold object such as a pot of water cannot become hot unless something else causes that heat. But‚ the cause must have a high degree as the effect. For it is impossible for one level of reality (the boiling water) to be produced by a cause that is less than the effect (a cold stove). Just as heated water is an effect that requires a cause‚ so Descartes’ idea of an infinite and perfect being is an
Premium God Ontology Metaphysics
Chapter 25 – Knowledge Gap -The knowledge gap hypothesis presumes that you will know more about these topics than people whose educational level is lower than yours‚ even if the topics don’t directly concern your everyday life. -Stated by Tichenor‚ Donohue and Olien in their 1970 article they said the population is divided into two distinct segments: a group of better educated people who know more about most things and those with low education who know less. -Low Socio-economic status (SES)
Premium Socioeconomic status Higher education Media
if your beliefs are truth and are justified to be count as knowledge? A question that is two famous philosophers answered by their own ways and theories. Plato did a major impact when it came to answer justification part of this question and Descartes made the other impact and helped answering the knowledge part of this question. Why must a belief be justified to count as knowledge? Believes have to be justified first to count as knowledge because how can you know something that is not proven true
Premium Epistemology Truth Belief
In his first meditation‚ Descartes embarks on a journey to ensure that all his beliefs are true. He deems that he must rid himself of all false knowledge in order to obtain any true knowledge. Descartes decides to doubt everything he has previously held to be true. He will rely on his reasoning ability to rebuild his own knowledge‚ beginning with things of which he is completely certain. He states‚ “But reason now persuades me that I should withhold my assent no less carefully from opinions that
Free Epistemology Deception Belief
have they made on my life? René Descartes (1596-1650) recognized that this influence of false beliefs could impair his scientific investigations‚ producing possible false conclusions to his thinking. Therefore‚ he "realized that it was necessary‚ once in the course of [my] life‚ to demolish everything completely and start again right from the foundations if [I] wanted to establish anything at all in the sciences that was stable and likely to last." Descartes began his philosophical career by trying
Premium Mind Epistemology Perception
studying this text‚ researcher can see into the ulture of Athens‚ and relationships between friends. “If the truth of all things always existed in the soul‚ then the soul is immortal”. This states that since the soul has all knowledge integrated‚ one recollects this knowledge through situations in an individual’s life and use one’s reasoning. Basically‚ through
Premium Platonism Plato Socrates
oceans‚ no mountains‚ no earth‚ no moon; just him and his isolation. In “Meditation Three”‚ Descartes goes much deeper than just his famous philosophical ideal — if “one can think one can be”(Descartes 19). He goes on to explain how there must be a God. He states that if there was not a God‚ people would have created themselves. If this were to be true‚ everyone would create themselves as perfect people. Descartes believes that there must be a God. God created humans and other humans and other objects
Premium God Existence Metaphysics
Descartes claims in his Discourse on Method that our dreams and conscious thoughts are untrue‚ but is this truly the case? Because of these questions of existence‚ it seems like‚ if Descartes’s arguments are taken a certain way‚ his arguments might be taken to imply that our lives are just a dream. Are we living in a universal soap opera directed by the Divine‚ and the question of who shot J.R. will never be resolved because we will all wake on Judgment Day from the dream of existence? If we are
Premium Metaphysics Epistemology Mind