I am going to discuss Shafer-Landau’s argument on Ethical Relativism‚ specifically his stand on Cultural Relativism. 1. Cultural Relativism says that a society’s or cultures basic ideals are considered morally right. 2. Cultural Relativism cannot make sense of moral progress. 3. Cultural Relativism contradicts itself because different societies can have different views. 4. Cultural Relativism doesn’t account for morality’s true nature. In support of Premise #2: Shafer claims “If a person’s or
Premium Morality Cultural relativism Truth
Cultural Relativism With the increase in hostilities between world powers and a rise in nationalism‚ borderline fascism‚ the blending of our societies have come to an intricate crossroads. Multiculturalism has literally come to a stopping point and an inverted rise in concern of the definition of collective groups has spurred the clashes within our societies. Thus‚ we must observe what is the relativity within cultures‚ and how does it shape our day to day interactions. Bringing to the forefront
Premium World War II United States World War I
entering the Nacirema village. At first glance he must have had culture shock when learning about the daily mouth cleansing and the temples where some enter and never return. I came to realize that western cultures share many of the same daily rituals just like the Nacirema. This non-material culture has many reglionist beliefs such has the use of witch doctors‚ medicine men‚ shrines and oddly enough the Nacirema woman bake their heads in oven. In evaluating the culture of the Nacirema we can break
Premium Sociology Culture Psychology
Calvin states " See‚ in order to improve oneself‚ one must have some idea of what’s good. That implies certain values". I believe Calvin is using Ethical relativism here‚ meaning he does what is right because his culture states that it is right. And I feel that he is saying basically what you feel is right for yourself is right because it’s the moral thing to do. I feel that Calvin did not set himself a New Year’s resolution because he personally feels that everything that he is doing is right
Premium
“You may keep one of your children” he said (Styron‚ 2014‚ p.74). In “Sophie’s choice”‚ the first theory she used to try to make her deci-sion was moral relativism. “Moral relativism is the view that moral judgments are true or false on-ly relative to some particular standpoint (for instance‚ that of a culture or a historical period) and that no standpoint is uniquely privileged over all others” (Westacot). “Take the
Premium Decision making Choice Decision theory
In the second article Ruth Benedict argues the theory of Moral Relativism. Benedict describes her theory by arguing three main points: Modern civilization is not necessarily the pinnacle of human achievement‚ normality is culturally defined‚ and normality is often associated by the term “good”. To argue that modern civilization
Premium Herodotus History Achaemenid Empire
The idea of right and wrong varies from culture to culture. The five tenets of cultural relativism going to depth defining moral codes. Complications and moral questions arise when one culture begins harming another—Nazi genocide‚ war‚ imperialism‚ etc. Geographic boundaries blur in our technologically advanced‚ globalized world. The most daunting logical challenge presented by cultural relativism is it hinders a society from judging the codes or values of another society and even our own (Lecture
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
Ethical relativism is a theory that holds that morality is relative to the rules of one’s culture. That is‚ when an action is right or wrong and depends on the moral rules of the society in which it is experienced. This action may be right in one society but be wrong in another. What’s right for you may not be what’s right for me. For example‚ I buy my stuff if I do not have the money I do not buy it at all. On the other hand‚ someone wants to buy something and they do not have enough money‚ so they
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
experiments that were most likely harmful‚ different theories would offer different explanations of why they think this situation is morally right or wrong. Two important theories that ethicists could use to help them make this decision are Ethical Relativism and Utilitarianism. From a relativist perspective we are not allowed to judge other cultures for their actions because we cannot see their culture from their point of view so we have no right to have opinions on them. An ethical relativist
Premium Ethics Morality Philosophy
Moral relativism is a person’s positions on what’s right or wrong based on a person’s individual choice‚ everyone can decide on what is right for themselves and in this case Anton Chigurh has decided that killing people in order to get what he wants is the right
Premium United States Sociology Decision making