What do you think about the Singer article? Do you think he’s right? Are we really morally obligated to give to relief efforts and other means of ending suffering until the point at which we would be giving up something of comparable moral worth? Why or why not? I think Singer has hit the nail on the head. Charity‚ or as he calls it‚ duty must be something to which everyone commits. Reading the article echoed what my mother used to say at the dinner table‚ "You know people in Africa would
Premium Life expectancy
Exegetical Peter Singer states that citizens of affluent nations are behaving immorally with the way they react to moral issues like helping those in need and our moral conceptual scheme needs to change. To do so‚ we need to be morally obligated to prevent bad things from happening if it does not require sacrificing something of comparable moral significance. His argument includes this principle where proximity or distance should not be taken into account when deciding whether to prevent something
Premium Morality Ethics Religion
“The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Summary/Response Melbourne‚ Australia native‚ Peter Singer‚ was born in 1946. Today‚ singer is known as one of the most controversial philosophers. Singer has taught at campuses such as Princeton‚ the University of Colorado and the University of California. Singer has had a long career as an animal rights activist and currently is a professor of Bioethics at Princeton University. Singer also writes books and was published in The New York Times. In Singers
Premium Poverty Ethics Africa
movement or the animal liberation movement is an effort designed to protect mammals from being mistreated and regarded as property by humans. Peter Singer is known as a Utilitarian and believes in maximizing individual happiness while minimizing nonhuman unhappiness. Singer claims that all human beings have the same worth as all nonhuman animals. Singer continued to argue that all animals are equal and the ethical principle on which human equality is based should be extended to animals. “Animal liberationists
Premium Animal rights Morality Mammal
Analysis In his article “Famine‚ Affluence‚ and Morality‚” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time. Peter Singer immediately encourages acceptance of his first moral standpoint with
Premium Morality Ethics Utilitarianism
My Favorite Chaperone An unknown person once said‚ “Our culture‚ our traditions‚ our language are the foundations upon which we build our identity.” Maya Alazova is an immigrant girl who moved to the United States from Kazakhstan. Things got bad in Kazakhstan‚ Maya’s parent lose their jobs‚ so Maya’s aunt that was already in the U.S‚ went to help them‚ she acted like a sponsor to migrated to America. From there‚ Maya and her family got jobs and went to school but still adapting to the environment
Premium United States English-language films Family
Rough Draft Response to The Visible Man by Peter Singer In a democracy‚ it is important that the government has less privacy than the people so that the government does not acquire too much power‚ this is because democracies are only possible when the people are in power‚ the right to privacy leads to power‚ and democratic governments answer to the people‚ so the people should be able to monitor their government. In The Visible Man‚ Singer insinuates that internet surveillance technology
Premium Democracy
Affluence‚ and Morality‚” written by Peter Singer‚ Singer’s goal is to convince people that our decisions and actions can prevent other countries from suffering. He suggests that people should do what is morally right by contributing financially to aid those who are starving‚ rather than purchasing “wants” for those who can afford it. Singer argues his position‚ provides counter-arguments‚ and explains his concepts for aiding countries in need. Singer argues that people have not given enough in
Premium Poverty Ethics Morality
against Mary Wollstonecraft (Singer‚ 1). In Singer’s reply to Taylor he says that one might reply by saying the case for equality between men and women cannot be given to non-human animals (Singer‚ 2). To summarize this argument‚ Singer says that women are just as intelligent and capable of voting as men so they are extended this right‚ while dogs are not mentally capable of recognizing and understanding the significance of voting so they are not given this right (Singer‚ 2). He then goes onto say
Premium Morality Animal rights Human
In my stay here‚ in the University of the Philippines‚ Los Baños‚ I can say that I have encountered things that I had never met before. I met new friends‚ new classmates‚ new teachers‚ new environment‚ and so much more that I have to adjust to. One of the things that I just knew from my stay here‚ in the university‚ is the study of Human Ecology. In this campus‚ I was given the subject HUME10. I had lots of impression about this subject before the start of classes. Before‚ I felt annoyed when I
Premium Psychology Sexual intercourse Gender