7002ENG Engineering Leadership and Communication Due: Wednesday 5th May 2010 GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY HENRY FORD – ASSIGNMENT 2 Nigel Gartshore S2756338 M.Senthilnathan S2744757 Karthik Varma Chekuri S2732276 Cymone Perry Professor Ljubo Vlacic | Mr Barry Sutherland S2587572 1 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 Introduction: ...................................
Premium Ford Motor Company Henry Ford Leadership
Analysis of Tiger Airways internal and external environment Low cost carriers (LCC)‚ also known as budget/discount airlines‚ offer generally low fares but eliminate most traditional passenger services. There are five low cost carriers operating in Australia namely Tiger Airways‚ Jetstar‚ AirAsia‚ Virgin Blue and Pacific Blue. The purpose of this report is to conduct an analysis of Tiger Airways internal and external environment and to make recommendations as to how the Tiger Airways might maintain
Premium Low-cost carrier Airline Strategic management
Organisational Behaviour Introduction IN This assignment based on Toyota motor corporation. Toyota is one of the world’s largest automobile manufacturers‚ selling over 8.8 million models in 2006 on all five continents. A Top 10 Fortune Global 500 enterprise‚ Toyota ranks among the world’s leading global corporations and is proud to be the most admired automaker‚ an achievement the company believes stems from its dedication to customer satisfaction. Toyota has been shaped by a
Premium Organizational structure Toyota Toyota Group
MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES Case study: Ford in China Ford motor company one of the biggest auto-making multinationals in the world has made a tremendously successful entry into the Chinese market. In Nov 2006‚ it announced its accelerated plan in China and a strong yearly performance in 2006 at a growth rate of 100.8 per cent. The origin of Ford’s presence in China can be traced to 1913 when Henry Ford sold his famous Model- T ‘s in Shanghai. Today Ford is back in China
Premium Ford Motor Company
THE FORD CASE Executive Summary After carefully analyzing Ford’s existing supply chain I immediately became aware of its highly complex nature. This high level of complexity combined with other internal and external factors have pushed Ford to search for solutions in order to overcome the costly supply chain challenges that they are facing and may continue to face in the future. Ford’s major difficulty in their present system is: the inefficient control of
Premium Supply chain Customer service Supply chain management
Principles of Management Henry Ford – A Great Innovator Submitted by: Souvik Chowdhury(05) Sachin Hegde (18) Kaustubh Patankar (34) Shishir Sahu (42) Shailendra Rumade (43) Rachana Vichare (54) Henry Ford In Early Days: Ford was born on July 30‚ 1863. He was the first child of the six children born to a farmer family in Dearborn‚ Michigan. A born tinkerer of mechanical equipments‚ Ford set off at the young age of sixteen to the nearby town of Detroit to work three years as a machinist’s apprentice
Premium Assembly line Henry Ford Ford Motor Company
portfolio → Strategic Failure • Costs grew disproportionately to rivals – Estimate: Costs Ford $2500/vehicle more to produce than Foreign rivals Industry Analysis • N.A. Automotive Industry: Difficult to be in – Positives • Captive but essential suppliers • High capital costs of potential entrants • Lack of feasible substitutes – Negatives • Low switching cost of buyers between firms • Fierce internal rivalry due to manufacturers competing with extensive product lines Porter’s Five Forces
Premium Ford Motor Company
Utilitarianism and the Ford Pinto Case The Ford Motor Company manufactured a subcompact vehicle called the Ford Pinto during the years from 1970 to 1980. The Ford Pinto was advertised successfully to consumers and The Ford Motor Company was rewarded with sales for the Ford Pinto in the hundreds of thousands. Was the reward worth the cost? The Ford Motor Company knowingly engineered the Ford Pinto with a design flaw in the placement of the gas tank and a design flaw in the connection of the fuel
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company
Conclusion V. Sources INTRODUCTION “For seven years the Ford Motor Company sold cars in which it knew hundreds of people would needlessly burn to death.” Mark Dowie‚ Author of Pinto Madness (8) One of the biggest automotive news stories in the latter part of the 1970’s dealt with tales of exploding Ford Pintos and the considerable awards civil court juries were presenting to victims of accidents involving the cars. Ford produced the Pinto automobile from 1971 to 1980. Initially the
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company
Ford had Responsibility to Fix Pinto The Ford Pinto case study clearly presents an unethical and immoral practice that shows corporate greed for a positive bottom line is more important than the value of human life. Along with the issue of greed is the need to outdo the competition to be the best in the automobile industry. Together these issues cloud the judgment of Ford’s management. The use of cost-benefit analysis to determine if the flaw in Ford Pinto automobiles is worth the financial
Premium Ford Pinto Ford Motor Company Automotive industry