12 Angry Men Welcome gentlemen of the jury‚ I am here to prove why the accused is guilty for murdering an innocent victim. At the time of the crime scene there were two witnesses who claim that the accused murdered the victim. One of the witnesses was an old man that lived above the accused apartment who heard the victim and the accused arguing‚ the second witness who lived across the street was an old lady who saw the victim get attacked by the accused with a knife. The weapon that the accused
Premium Murder Capital punishment Life imprisonment
In Twelve Angry Men‚ a boy is convicted of the murder of his father and 12 jurors are chosen to decide his fate. In the beginning‚ all of the evidence points to him being guilty. However‚ after a little bit of analysis of the evidence‚ there is some reasonable doubt. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: Juror 3. The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the directors shot selection in the film and in the text affect the readers
Premium Difference Not proven Anger
hottest day of the year in New York City‚ and 12 clammy men‚ who were put on a jury‚ are locked into a room‚ where the fan doesn’t work and the windows stick‚ to discuss the case of an 18 year old accused of murder. In the opening scene‚ the judge states that is it a first degree murder and if found guilty the teenager will receive the death penalty. The 18 year old is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade. The 12 jurors must decide if there is enough evidence to convict
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Film Techniques in Twelve Angry Men Summary: Reviews the film Twelve Angry Men‚ directed by Sidney Lumet. Discusses the director’s use of cinematic techniques‚ including lighting‚ music‚and set design‚ to reinforce the themes of the story. ________________________________________ "Twelve Angry Men"‚ directed by Sidney Lumet‚ is a film which portrays intentions significantly employed by the use of film techniques. Although entirely set in a cramped‚ humid jury room (except for the few minutes
Premium Film Jury Film techniques
In 12 angry men there are many themes that are present one of the major themes that is found was present is‚ one determined and skilled individual can wield a lot of influence. Juror number eight is a “quiet‚ thoughtful‚ gentle man” he seesall points of the argument and wants to find the truth. On the other hand juror number three is “a very strong‚ very forceful‚ extremely opinionated man” his opinion is all that matters and if other people don’t agree with it they are automatically wrong. All
Premium Thought Jury Not proven
Juror Ten harbours strong bias towards people of low socioeconomic status and wealth‚ because of this he becomes one of the most fervent attackers of the defendant. He openly discriminates throughout the duration of the play‚ and makes no effort to disguise his bigotry. While in the beginning his passion for “smack[ing] them down” is tolerated by a number of the other men‚ ultimately his bias and stubbornness causes the group to reject him and his ill-informed ideas. The Tenth Juror refers to the
Premium Jury Not proven Verdict
Juror # 1: He is the foreman on this jury. He takes his role very seriously but is seen at times to lose control of the proceedings of the group of jury members that he is supposed to oversee. Juror # 2: He seems to be the most timid and nervous member of the jury. He is easily swayed by the opinion of others. Juror # 3: He is the most vociferous member of the jury. He has some very strong opinions which at times appear to not be backed by any logic. His character shows some signs of sadism ingrained
Premium
Set in the sweltering summer of 1954‚ Reginald Rose’s socially insightful play "Twelve Angry Men"‚ illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve individuals to reach a "life or death" decision with collective states of minds hindered by "personal prejudice". At the conception of the play‚ rose explores the idea that doubt is a harder state of mind than certainty by portraying doubt‚ in the guilt of the boy‚ as a minority view within the courtroom. However‚ as the play progresses
Premium Jury Verdict Not proven
story‚ 12 Angry Men‚ there are multiple similarities and several differences from what is in the movie. In fact‚ there are more differences than there are similarities. Some of the differences really change the movie from the book. In the opening act of the short story‚ there is a narration that states that the judge is a male. In the opening act of the movie‚ you can see that the judge is not a male. Also‚ in the story‚ the judge seems quite a bit more serious about making the jurors really think
Free Jury Judge Short story
therefore the struggle is inevitable. Reginald Rose’s Twelve Angry Men shows that the jurors have a tough time deciding upon the guilt of the accused. There are two opposing views of justice based on the evidence given. As the 8th juror and others join‚ the audience sees a perspective of justice that favors the accused and that wants most for him to have a fair shot. “Everybody deserves a fair trial. That’s the system.” To the 8th Juror‚ the boy’s poor and troubled upbringing‚ his state-appointed
Free Jury Not proven Court