the affirmative action policy morally defensible? Explain. Yes affirmative action is morally defensible in that: South Africa has been characterised by many years of workplace inequities and imbalances of the past particularly blacks who were treated in an inhumane manner and denigration. In 1994 the new democratic government came into power and had a moral duty to eliminate all forms of discrimination and thereafter level the playing field at the workplace‚ hence the affirmative action
Premium Affirmative action Democracy Government
USING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TO PROMOTE WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT IN GHANA INTRODUCTION Social Development‚ by definition‚ aims at promoting the welfare or well-being content and outcomes of development policy and practice‚ in ways that at the same time‚ advance the instrumentality or empowerment of individuals and groups. Social development does not only advocate for an improvement in well-being‚ but also that policies and programmes should advance a greater ability to effect change. Social Development
Premium Discrimination Affirmative action Political science
inclination or personal interest attached with the will. In other words‚ we should act from respect for the moral law‚ keeping aside our personal interests. Kant then goes on to propose that the actions done from duty should be morally based upon a maxim‚ i.e. the rule which determines the duty or the actions that we must carry out; and the maxim must form the Law of morality. To form the Law of morality‚ the maxim must satisfy two properties. The first property is that the maxim could be formed into
Free Morality Law Ethics
There is a very clear way that any sophisticated utilitarian could handle this proposal. Obviously‚ they have to consider that the limited sports program needs to be incorporated‚ but at the same time they can’t cut too heavily into the current sports program. There is a very clear plan that would allow the physically impaired student to have their new sport program added‚ without greatly hindering the current sports program. It has been said that the cost of the new program is four times as high
Premium Fundraising Disability
ethical problems within utilitarianism. Kantian theory follows the same principle but with greater emphasis on the respect for all things involved with ethical quandaries. Both have their critiques yet both ideas are conceived in an effort to understand and conceptualize some of the biggest controversies and questions that evolve around ethics. This paper will be an attempt to delineate the key components that fabricate each theory‚ first utilitarianism and then Kantian theory and through examples and practical
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
Examine how utilitarian arguments might be applied to one issue of your choice? ACT UTILITARIANISM Act Utilitarian theories start with specific cases from which general principles can be deduced. Bentham’s Hedonic Calculus weighs up the following measures of the consequential pleasure/pain: CertaintyDurationExtentIntensityRemotenessRichnessPurity Situation 1 – Abortion would be morally right if the mother’s life is in danger. The period of the pain of the loss of the mother will be ongoing‚ the
Premium Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant Morality
The Kantian approach to torture is that we ban it entirely‚ although this would be the most preferred method in a perfect world‚ we do not live in a perfect world. Because war‚ terrorism‚ and crime exists‚ on occasion torture can effectively prevent large scale
Premium Law Lawyer Judge
Aaron Feuerstein & Malden Mills MGMT 368 ~ Business Ethics July 21‚ 2013 “The Mensch of Malden Mills” Aaron Feuerstein is well-known in the community of Lawrence‚ Massachusetts as the owner of Malden Mills. Perhaps more importantly‚ he is known as the man who cares about his workers and goes out of his way to help them; the man with deep convictions to see things through to the end because he is a man who keeps his word. Mr. Feuerstein is also known around the globe as one of the only businessmen
Premium Decision making Aaron Feuerstein
up an argument that is very taboo in today’s politically correct culture; is reverse discrimination a just action during the post-civil rights movement era? The answer Newton gives is no. Affirmative Action was the policy that set the precedent for reverse discrimination. While I agree with her arguments‚ I don’t believe she went far enough into the sort of prejudice that Affirmative Action creates. Newton has two main arguments against the current practice; if we are going to use this practice in
Premium Racism Gender Feminism
Final word count: 1597 A. THE CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE For this case‚ I will be using Kantian ethics to pinpoint the rationally correct action to take. Before discussing Kantian ethics in relation to the case‚ we must first explore what Kantian ethics is. Kantian ethics comes from the deontological school of thought‚ which focuses on the moral correctness of the act in itself (Johnson‚ 2013). This means that the judgment on the act is done a priori. This is contrasted to the consequentialist school
Premium Immanuel Kant Philosophy Categorical imperative