Through Descartes first three meditations he arrives at a conclusion that the only things we know with absolute certainty are‚ that my own thoughts and god exist. He solidifies this stance by two foundational arguments laid out in the first meditation to build off of. I find that these arguments to reach these beliefs to be flawed by Descartes own reasoning and by scientific advancements made since his time. Before I can debate these arguments I need to outline Descartes purpose and reasoning for
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind
“God is the only substance that can exist or be conceived.” Spinoza’s criticism of Descartes’ substance dualism By: Jawad Samimi 01/04/2012 Substance dualism is often called ‘Cartesian dualism" and is the assumption that mind and body are really distinct substances. Rene Descartes (1596 – 1650) was the first early modern philosopher to hold that a thinking-thing is entirely different form an extended thing and mind can exist without the body. Cartesian dualism‚ which started the famous mind-body
Premium René Descartes Mind Metaphysics
the works or David Hume and René Descartes come into play. Hume was a Scottish philosopher whose epistemological work revolved around the idea that our senses relay the truth to us. Descartes believed did not trust
Premium Philosophy Perception Epistemology
DESCARTES’ GOD Do we need a watchmaker god or the Christian God and how is it related to living a good life? The subject of god has always fascinated me‚ and I love to read how others interpret their personal gods. It is also interesting to see how people prioritize their gods in their life and what importance they give their gods. I believe that the Christian God is the true God and exactly what we need to live a good life. We need to have a goal and an end‚ which is eternal happiness with
Premium God Christianity Jesus
First‚ I will discuss the views of Descartes’ philosophy about knowledge. In his writing‚ Mediations on First Philosophy‚ Descartes claims that knowledge originates from reasoning‚ thinking. He begins the argument by expressing that even though the knowledge he has obtained was through the use of his senses‚ he is unable to have faith in them because they are deceivable. “Whatever I have accepted until now as most true has come to me through my senses. But occasionally I have found that they have
Premium Epistemology Metaphysics Mind
What is common in Locke‚ Hobbes and Rousseau is state of nature. In the state of nature all people are equal although they have different tallents they are equal‚ because having different tallents doesn’t prevent equality - and have same rights but in time they try to command each other and make domination upon them. Hobbes associate this desire with the effort to dispel the insecurity which is caused by equality between people. According to his opinion‚ if two people desire the same thing that
Premium Morality Ethics
meditation one‚ Descartes believes that sciences require that the truth is absolutely certain and because of this he chooses to reject any all beliefs that have even a slight possibility of doubt. But since all beliefs can’t be proved certain‚ then all of the beliefs he has are doubtful and deceiving. And because his senses tell him this false belief is true‚ his senses are also an illusion. To simplify: all of Descartes’ beliefs and senses are illusions that an “evil genius” made up. Descartes feels like
Premium Epistemology Truth Metaphysics
In René Descartes Meditations on first Philosophy‚ he goes through a process of elimination of concepts he has formed up in his mind‚ to come to conclude whether he is a living thing. Descartes at a point in his meditation comes to say‚ that he is a living thing due to his ability to think. In his Meditations on first Philosophy‚ he says that he is precisely nothing but a thinking thing. In this paper I will be explaining how Descartes came to formulate his conclusion of his existence being so‚ owing
Premium Mind Metaphysics Epistemology
with‚ Descartes‚ divided the world into two kinds of substances. He divided it by the “res cogitas” and “res extensa‚” which translates into “thinking substance‚ or mind and soul” and “extended substance‚ or body.” Afterwards‚ Descartes further divides substance into two more sections‚ “infinite thinking substance and finite thinking substance.” Descartes does not divide extended substance in two more sections as he claims that all extended substances are finite extended substances. As Descartes continues
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
The two passages dealt with religious tolerance‚ each from a different perspective. The first passage‚ John Locke’s "A Letter Concerning Toleration" from 1689‚ was written from the viewpoint of a man under a king’s rule in England. The second passage‚ "The Blind Men and the Elephant‚" is a Buddhist parable. Locke’s reasoning for religious tolerance is all over the place. He first explains that no man has any right to enforce his beliefs on another man‚ stating that faith comes from within one’s
Premium Religion Christianity God