Cases in Canadian Law Dehghani v. Canada: The appellant‚ a citizen of Iran‚ arrived in Canada on May 13‚ 1989‚ and claimed refugee status. After being questioned in the primary examination line‚ he was referred to a secondary examination‚ which involved a long wait‚ and‚ as he did not speak English‚ an interpreter was provided for him. At the secondary interview‚ the appellant omitted significant facts. This case involves two issues that are worthy of analysis‚ as he claims‚ first of all‚ that
Premium Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Supreme Court of the United States Canada
ASSIGNMENT WEEK 4 AED 200 2/24/14 JUNETT JOHNSON The teaching profession has rights and responsibilities much like any other profession. Keeping in mind that obtaining a teachers license is a privilege not a right‚ and maintaining that privilege is up to the teacher. One way to do this is to become aware of the necessary conditions to become employed and to keep that employment. This will include what rights you have under your contract as a teacher
Premium Education High school Pregnancy
This court decision creates a distinct precedent that gives schools the full right of search and seizure based on “reasonable suspicion”. To be clear on this rule‚ previously school officials must have probable cause to conduct searches on students. Probable cause is defined as "a reasonable amount of suspicion‚ supported by circumstances sufficiently strong to justify a prudent and cautious person’s belief that certain facts are probably true” (Ballantine’s Law Dictionary) . On the other hand‚ for
Premium Education High school Teacher
may be harmful to the school environment. There is debate about whether this violates our 4th amendment right against unreasonable searches‚ but theses drug-sniffing dogs are trained and when they identify something wrong‚ it is considered reasonable cause to search what the dog found. Drug-sniffing dogs should be allowed to search school property‚ including lockers‚ to ensure that every student is given the right
Premium Education High school Supreme Court of the United States
Teachers and school administrators are legally allowed to search students without a warrant. Student’s basic rights are being violated and it shouldn’t be legal. Their rights shouldn’t be limited because it invades student’s privacy. Also‚ these searches could be unreasonable and suspicion less. These students can be searched without a warrant. People in school shouldn’t have their rights limited and violated just because of suspicious teachers. This limitation of students’ rights is unconstitutional
Premium Education High school Teacher
TIDs improperly opens the door to unreasonable searches and seizures. Because of the nature of the intrusion‚ TIDs somehow fall outside the letter of the law. However‚ do they fall outside the spirit in which the laws were originally crafted? This paper will react to this point. Essentially‚ technology has made it easier for the authorities to conduct covert surveillance. Private citizens can become the targets of police and law enforcement searches. Oftentimes‚ there might seem to be a reasonable
Premium Surveillance Privacy Law
Some of these include doing more drug searches‚ locker checks‚ and bag checks. The fourth amendment in the United States Constitution states that search and seizure is prohibited unless there is a probable cause and requires a warrant for actions to be taken. (US Constitution) This keeps schools from searching the students personal property unless there is a legal reason to do so. Many schools provide drug searches where an authority figure‚ such as a police officer‚ will come
Premium United States Immigration to the United States Illegal immigration
Civics Report Students Rights I chose to do my report on students rights in the public school system. Lisa Rowe‚ then sixteen a student at Teaneck High School‚ in New Jersey‚ thought she was doing a good dead when she returned a purse she’d found in her English class. When she took the purse to the office instead of being rewarded she was told to step into the principals office and asked to pull up her sweater and pull down her slacks‚ and then she was searched. Why? In case she was hiding
Free Supreme Court of the United States First Amendment to the United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
she remained anonymous until recently.The principal‚ Ted Choplick‚ demanded that he searches her purse. Choplick found rolls‚ paraphernalia-marijuana‚ money‚ a list of names‚ and a box of cigarettes‚ he then excluded the contents. After being arrested TLO said due to the Fourth Amendment‚ stating “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated‚ and no warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause
Premium Abuse Bullying High school
challenge to the policy arose when a student and his parents refused to consent to drug testing and he was denied the chance to play football. Their lawsuit charged that the district violated his Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures as well as his privacy rights under the Oregon state constitution. The District Court rejected their claims‚ but they won on appeal. The school district then appealed to the U.S. Supreme
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States United States Constitution