Pope Alexander VI‚ kings in Italy did not respect the popes and their authority. After him‚ other popes continued to increase the power of the church. Machiavelli suggests Lorenzo de’ Medici to make his position great through his goodness. One thing I can notice in this chapter is the ambition for power of the popes who they claim to be the
Premium Christianity Catholic Church Pope
1. When Machiavelli discusses that there are two kinds of combat‚ one with laws and one with force‚ what he is really talking about is that for a prince to be successful he must learn how to manage both. Machiavelli uses the lion and the fox example in order to make a metaphor out of the entire situation. A fox is cunning and smart and is therefore immune to traps. However‚ a fox cannot defend itself against a larger and more powerful animal such as a wolf — that’s where the lion comes in. A lion
Premium Human Lion Dog
it more evident that Christianity persuades his views. Although it seems his writings have become quite well known and admired‚ not everyone fully shared his beliefs. Niccolo Machiavelli‚ for instance‚ seemed to believe in a government that was not driven by morality‚ but more by practicality. In‚ The Prince‚ Machiavelli stresses that the moral fibers of government should not be so soft. Like St. Augustine‚ his work went on to become one of the most famous books ever written about politics. Throughout
Premium Morality Political philosophy God
HOW SHOULD BE A LEADER? There are a lot of intellectuals who have books and different thoughts about government and authority. One of them is Machiavelli who is reputed with his book the Prince’. This book includes some advice to leaders. Machiavelli claims in Prince’ (chapter XVI‚ XVII‚ XVIII) that a prince should be miser than liberal‚ should prefer being feared rather than being loved‚ and should not be faithful. In my opinion‚ a leader shuld not be miser and should prefer being loved
Premium Political philosophy Leadership Love
of government with of Machiavelli in the next selection. Consider what seem to be the ultimate purposes of government‚ what seem to the obligations of the leader to the people being led‚ and what seems to be the main work of the state. What comparisons can you make between Lao-tzu’s Master and Machiavelli’s Prince. Summary: The writings of Machiavelli and Lao Tzu indicate that they would disagree most strongly on the concept of how a government should run. Machiavelli believed that in strong
Premium Political philosophy
Macbeth would’ve succeeded in reducing his enemies by surrounding himself with trusted allies and developing relationships that would allow him to flourish as a leader. Macbeth‚ by killing Duncan and Banquo‚ lost the respect of those around him. Machiavelli proposed that “it cannot be called prowess… to betray friends” (Machiavelli 29)‚ and this brings a prince “power but not glory” (29). The glory that Macbeth is unable to procure prevents Lennox‚ Macduff‚ and Malcolm from recognizing him as a great
Premium William Shakespeare Macbeth Duncan I of Scotland
Luther King Jr. and Niccolo Machiavelli were two important leaders and philosophers from two different time periods. Martin Luther King was a strong and respected leader who preached against segregation and racism during the civil rights era. Niccolo Machiavelli was an Italian diplomat and political philosopher known for his political views and writings. Though King and Machiavelli were known as philosophers‚ their views on certain topics could not be more different. Machiavelli believed that being vicious
Premium Political philosophy Law Nonviolence
Machiavelli‚ a most intelligent man who lived in Florence‚ wrote an opinionated handbook for princes (or soon to be princes) and the factor of referencing history is what he included to make his novel so much more reliable‚ supported‚ and legitimate. He often alludes to the Romans‚ discusses the Carthaginians‚ and Hannibal. While discussing which principalities one should please‚ Machiavelli uses the Romans as his good example. They‚ without personal gain‚ settled in and supported some principalities
Premium Political philosophy Florence The Prince
Macbeth; Not a Machiavellian Leader Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince was written as a guide to success for future and current rulers all over the world. Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Machiavelli’s The Prince both present different viewpoints on how to be a noble ruler. Some people say that Macbeth is a Machiavellian ruler. Others qualify him saying that he holds certain Machiavellian traits but not all. While other people say he isn’t a Machiavellian character at all‚ nor does he possess any qualities
Premium Macbeth Machiavellianism The Prince
Niccolo Machiavelli‚ arguably the finest political theorist of his time‚ wrote in his famous work “The Prince” that a ruler use any methods available to him to maintain stability‚ for even though some methods might seem abusive and purely attempts toward staying in power‚ in reality they benefit the people because the ruler manages to maintain stability which is all the people could ask for. If another country is about to attack yours and your people are at risk‚ would you even hesitate in bribing
Premium Political philosophy Cesare Borgia The Prince