After watching the Milgram experiment and the abuse that occur in Abu Ghraib prison. It is clear that leadership roles and authority position can both influence people to do thing that are harmful and bad to others. Leadership focuses on gaining people to follow them and is more based on free will. While authority has the power to tell people what to do. In the Milgram experiment many people back up why they continue administering shocks by stating‚ “Because an authority figure was telling them
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
The Stanford Prison Experiment – Phillip Zimbardo Introduction Headed by Phillip Zimbardo‚ the Stanford Prison Experiment was designed with the aim of investigating how readily people would behave and react to the roles given to them within a simulated prison. The experiment showed that the social expectations that people have of specific social situations can direct and strongly influence behaviour. The concepts evident in the Stanford Prison Experiment include social influence‚ and within that
Premium Stanford prison experiment Social psychology Milgram experiment
instructions when they feel compelled remains challenging and difficult to understand in social psychology. However‚ social psychologist Stanley Milgram investigated the impact of authority figure on obedience in an experiment perhaps known as the best-known study in social psychology (Fiske‚ 2008). Also‚ the motivation for Stanley to conduct this experiment is to understand why individuals will engage in horrific acts that put others in imminent danger that can lead to severe harm. However‚ Stanley
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Stanford prison experiment
Milgram’s experiment in 1960 by social psychologist Dr. Stanely Milgram’s (1963‚ 1965) was a controversial experiment. He researched the effect of authority on obedience. I don’t think the scientific community overreacted to this experiment because it is unethical to reduce subjects to "twitching shuttering wrecks". Though the human mind is amazing strong we still do not know its breaking point. For interviewers to carry out the kind of experiment they did‚ they have to be willing to face the consequences
Premium Psychology Stanford prison experiment Ethics
and differences are given between two articles as well as the readers own opinion of the authors’ work. In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience”‚ certain experiments were conducted on separate types of individuals. Milgram forces his subjects to administer shocks to a non-existent person on the other side of a wall. This experiment questions the obedience of individuals when put in a sadistic environment. On the other hand in Solomon E. Asch’s “Opinions and Social Pressure”‚ he gives a basic
Free Milgram experiment Stanley Milgram Stanford prison experiment
In the Milgram experiment‚ a man picks random people to participate in an experiment. They believe that they are helping discover the roles of punishment on behavior. Although‚ this is not true. The participants themselves are the ones being analyzed. The experiment is to discover how far someone would obey an instruction of harming another person‚ despite personal conflict. The participant and an actor are places in a room and “get to choose” their roles of either teacher or learner‚ although the
Premium
had to give an electric shock. The subjects were told that this was part of an experiment‚ by someone in a white coat. In one case‚ the subject was informed that the person they were administering "shocks" to had a heart condition. If at any time the subject indicated his desire to halt the experiment‚ he was given a succession of verbal prods by the experimenter‚ in this order: Please continue. The experiment requires that you continue. It is absolutely essential that you continue.
Premium Person Nazi Germany Nazism
both showing how humans obey authority. Milgram studied obedient on authority. Zimbardo studied why guards and prisoner play that role in prison. The Milgram and Zimbardo experiments showed how humans are so obedient that we are capable of hurting innocent people if ordered to do so. The study of obedience‚ conducted by Milgram‚ was to test how the subject would obey when ordered by the experimenter to adminater a shock to another human. Two experiments were conducted. The first used Yale undergraduates
Premium Stanford prison experiment
Replicating Milgram: Would People Still Obey Today? The Milgram Experiment Is a very well-known experiment in social psychology .The concept was first started in 1963 by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgren in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology in Behavioral Study of Obedience published a paper‚ later also in his 1974 publication Obedience to Authority: Discussed in the An Experimental View. The main purpose of this experiment is testing the subjects issued against conscience
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
Milgram‚ S. (1974) Obedience to Authority. Predictions and variations conclusion. Summary of Milgram’s study detailing the average levels of shock ‘teachers’ administered and the percentage of ‘teachers’ administering the maximum voltage with results reported by prediction and type of authority variation. The data shows during the experimental conditions the highest average voltage that ‘teachers’ stopped administering shocks was in the original study (368 Volts) with the highest percentage of
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Psychology