that instant if it’d be for the greater cause of science and knowledge? In discussion of psychologist Stanley Milgram‚ a controversial issue has been whether or not Milgram’s experiment was based on the ethical conflict between obedience to authority versus personal conscience. On the one hand‚ some argue that it was ethical because it would explain Nazi behavior. From this perspective‚ Milgram believed that all it was just human aggression held deep within and when given the chance to let it out‚ people
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Stanley Milgram
to stand against the majority opinion. Several famous studies have looked at different aspects of conformity and how subjects respond to certain situations. The results of the Milgram‚ Asch‚ and Zimbardo studies can teach us to avoid abuses of power in the future. The first study discussed was conducted by Stanley Milgram‚ and it looked at how far a participant would go in hurting another human when told to do so by the researcher in charge. Sometimes subjects gave what was supposed to be a potentially
Premium Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Psychology
Milgram experiment tells us about human and obedience. Humans are socially adapted to the society they live in and obedience is when a group humans follows the rule no matter wrong or right. Humans are usually obedient in most situations. That is due to teachings they receive. For example‚ when Hitler was killing groups of people‚ it was wrong; but the group of authority just listen to him and followed the rules. This situation was wrong and harmful but it was something that they just followed because
Premium Morality Human Crime
Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiment One of the most famous studies of obedience in psychology was carried out by Stanley Milgram (1963). Stanley Milgram‚ a psychologist at Yale University‚ conducted an experiment focusing on the conflict between obedience to authority and personal conscience. He examined justifications for acts of genocide offered by those accused at the World War II‚ Nuremberg War Criminal trials. Their defense often was based on "obedience" - that they were just
Free Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment Stanley Milgram
Stanley Milgram Experiment The video I watched was a reenactment of the original Stanley Milgram experiment conducted by Derren Brown. In the experiment‚ the subjects were told that they were doing an experiment on how punishment could affect learning. They were tricked into thinking that they picked their own roles when they actually got the teacher roles and the actor got the learner role on purpose. They started the experiment by showing them what they were going to do to the “learner”. They were
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Outline and Evaluate Milgrams Study of Obedience (12 marks) . Milgram after advertising for volunteer participants were paid on arrival at the laboratory for their time. Participants‚ believing they were taking part in a memory experiment‚ were introduced in pairs to the experimenter where they ‘decided’ who was to be either a ‘teacher’ or a ‘learner’. In reality one of the ‘pairs’ of participants was a confederate and the chances were rigged so that the real participant was always the ‘teacher’
Premium Milgram experiment Shock
In the 1960s‚ Milgram‚ then a professor at Yale‚ recruited ordinary people through a newspaper ad offering them money to help in a project purporting to improve human memory. In Milgrams experiment two people come into the laboratory where they are told they will be taking part in a study of memory and learning. Milgram was interested in how people obey under authoritative circumstances‚ using "fake" settings to test obedience. Under any given circumstance people tend to obey authority differently
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
How evil are we? Imagine being able to tell if someone was evil or good. In “The Milgram Experiment” they prove they can prove whether people are evil or good. In the test they have volunteer teachers come and help the learner learn. If the learner gets the question wrong the teacher is told to give them a painful shock. If the teacher continues‚ even after the learner pleads for them to stop‚ their evil. 77% of the volunteers completed the test. In one of the trials the participant didn’t speak
Premium Good and evil God Problem of evil
Is it fair to deceive humans in an unethical psychological experiment in order to receive new information? This is a question that I believe needs to be asked when one thinks of the Milgram experiment‚ a psychological study set up in the U.S in 1965. American psychologist Stanley Milgram held an experiment in order to see how severely ordinary human beings could knowingly cause harm to another human. This idea came about when he studied the holocaust in Germany in WWII‚ and then in the Nuremberg
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Evaluate Milgrams research into obedience. Stanley Milgram (1963) explains why 65% of the people did something they felt was morally wrong‚ that is they went into an agentic state and exhibited some aspects of denial in order to avoid moral strain. However‚ Milgram does not explain why 65% did not obey. In other words‚ it does not explain individual differences as the volunteers in Milgrams experiment seemed to resist the pressure and Milgram does not explain that. To continue‚ the experiment
Premium Ethics Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment