stops after death. Regardless‚ once again‚ logic and faith are at a crossroads when discussing the possibility of the afterlife. This is because of what I call: the too many heavens account. In correspondence with our notion of God‚ the amount of religions that are followed is irreducible to the idea of God’s
Premium Meaning of life God Atheism
a) Explain key ideas in the Design Argument for the existence of God. (30 Marks) b) Assess the view that science has made the Design Argument a failure. (15 Marks) “With such signs of forethought in the design of living creature‚ can you doubt they are the work of choice or design?” (Socrates) The Design argument looks at the order and purpose‚ or telos‚ in the world and states that it implies that there must be a designer who made the world ‘just right’ for human existence. Religious believers
Premium Charles Darwin Teleological argument Intelligent design
Cited: Hume‚ David. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. [London]‚ 1779. Print. Mackie‚ J. L. "Iv.—Evil And Omnipotence." Mind LXIV.254 (1955): 200-12. Print. Plantinga‚ Alvin. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon‚ 1974. Print.
Premium God Good and evil Philosophy of religion
Why God Allows Evil Swinburne defends the view that the existence of evil in the world is consistent with the existence of an omnipotent‚ perfectly good God. Not only are they consistent‚ he argues‚ but the amount of good in the world requires the possibility of substantial evil. He begins his argument by distinguishing moral evil (which comes from humans acting in morally bad ways) from natural evil (pain and suffering that comes from anything other than human action with predictable outcome)‚
Free Good and evil Evil Philosophy of religion
“Explain the argument from religious experience for the existence of God.”30 marks Expect different forms of the argument from religious experience‚ e.g. inductive argument‚ direct awareness‚ cumulative argument. Also expect reference to Swinburne’s principle of credulity and principle of testimony. Maximum Level 2 if summary of types of religious experience with no reference to argument for God. ------------------------------------------------- Level 7 for one fully developed argument‚ or two
Premium Existence Logic Philosophy of religion
Religious experiences cannot be explained empirically and tend to take place within a context of religious expectancy. Such experiences may be individual‚ in which a person becomes aware of the presence of the divine; or corporate‚ in which a gathering of people experiences feelings beyond expression – the ineffable. St Teresa of Avila described her experiences as: “God established himself in the interior of this soul in such a way‚ that when I return to myself‚ it is wholly impossible for me to
Premium God Philosophy of religion Existence
The Augustinian theodicy is a type of Christian theodicy designed to respond to the evidential problem of evil. As such‚ it attempts to explain the probability of an omnipotent and omnibenevolent (or all-powerful and perfectly loving) God amid evidence of evil in the world. A number of variations of this kind of theodicy have been proposed throughout history‚ but their similarities were first described by John Hick‚ who classified them as Augustinian. They typically assert that God is perfectly good
Premium Philosophy of religion Problem of evil God
1. The fallacy of relevance is ad hominem is when the motive or character of the person associated with the argument is attacked. The response from the publisher of Vogue is an example of this as he ignored Omega’s brand directors reason to withdraw their ads and introduced a different motive‚ that the director was just unhappy with the way his product was photographed. However‚ this does not make the argument fallacious as the brand directors motive is irrelevant to the truth. 2. The fallacy of
Premium God Morality Ethics
Despite Mackie seeming to have proven the logical problem of evil to be sound it is not surprising that theists have sought to resolve the problem rather than abandoning their beliefs. Responses to the problem of evil fall into the categories of defences or theodicies. Generally speaking a defence is used in response to the logical problem‚ simply showing how there is no logical inconsistency. This does not require an explanation of evil‚ nor need it be true‚ as a false though coherent explanation
Premium God Problem of evil Good and evil
Harry Frankfurt article focuses on the logic of omnipotence of God. He criticizes George Mavrodes article‚ because he believes that he does not provide any evidence besides it being a reference and the support of Saint Thomas Aquinas (Frankfurt‚ 2016‚ p. 25). Frankfurt looks specifically at the aspect of if God can do one unfeasible task‚ then why can he not do two tasks that are not feasible. He inevitably believes that God can do the unimageable‚ so he can do anything he puts his mind to. When
Premium Metaphysics God Existence