The Texas Judicial system is a puzzling topic to most citizens and has its pros and cons. The system is not liked by everybody because of the way it selects our judges. When comparing it to other states outside of Texas‚ it is different in many ways. For years many citizens and government officials have fought to reform the system. Many have failed‚ been rejected and have given up‚ while others take rejection has a reason to fight harder and fix the Judicial system. The Texas Judicial system is
Premium Judge Supreme Court of the United States Law
declaring vacant positions to the public‚ reviews the applications‚ shortlists the qualified candidates on the grounds of experience and fitness and then presents a precise list to the Texas governor who then makes the appointment. This process will necessitate for fairness and overall competence in service delivery. The reasons why this system is deemed fit are: • This criterion of judge selection through the relevant commission boosts the independence of the judicial arm of the government through an elimination
Premium Supreme court Judge Court
company’s objectives‚ the Code of Conduct expands upon these objectives and is tailored to each company’s specific business and job classification. When Codes are violated‚ disciplinary action should be taken. In this article from the Alaska Dispatch News‚ a judge has been accused of violating the Alaska Code of Judicial Conduct for insensitive statements. Within this Code is a very detailed listing of a judge’s‚ duties and responsibilities. Under Canon 3 of this
Premium Ethics Business ethics Morality
Once the facts are determined‚ the judge will then make the application of law to the facts to determine which party would succeed. The doctrine of judicial precedent is important because it is the ratio decidendi of a previously decided similar case‚ decided by a higher court to the current facts that will decide the solution of the case. 1 JUDICIAL PRECEDENT The weight or authority of rules of law derived from cases may vary. These relative weights are determined by the doctrine
Premium Common law
Introduction: The judicial system in Canada strives to maintain the position that those who enter the courts are innocent until proven guilty. Many minorities enter the courts for various reasons‚ sometimes opposing bills‚ other times for offences that are not always correct. Bills have been passed that target certain groups‚ minorities face the possibility of their ethnicity affecting how they are treated by the police and courts and‚ in particular‚ the indigenous people face negative victimization
Premium Law Judge Jury
modern time and in the U.S. Why‚ you may ask. The U.S’ judicial system makes sure you know and have all of your rights‚ you get to choose between a jury trial or a bench trial‚ and you are innocent until proven guilty. If the jury or judge makes a mistake on your verdict you can always appeal. Although‚ I know that the U.S’ judicial system is not perfect but it is a pretty good one if you want to ensure justice. The first reason why the U.S’ judicial system helps ensure justice is that you know all of
Premium Crime Law Police
out the necessary justice. Rape is a horrible crime that promotes self-esteem issues‚ trauma‚ and even suicide for the victim. Why should the perpetrator get away with a slap on the wrist? Two main causes lead the judicial system to be inadequate in rape cases; these factors are victim blaming and lack of punishment. Due to these reasons‚ I believe that the judicial systems needs a reformation in order to help rape victims and to better prosecute
Premium Rape Sexual intercourse Human sexual behavior
Judicial Appointments For Fast Track Courts 2002 Under Article 139 - A of the Constitution of India 06.05.2002 Brij Mohan Lal Vs. Union of India and Other s With T.C. (C) No. 23 / 2001. SLP (C) No. 7870.10645 of 2001 and T.P. (C) No. 407 - 410 of 2001 Case Summary A case relating to the establishment and functioning of Fast Track Courts‚ which came into existence for the speedy disposal of long pending Sessions cases. The Eleventh Finance Commission allocated Rs.502.90 crores under the
Premium Judge Bench
The doctrine of judicial precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis which means ‘to stand by what has been decided’. It is a common law principle whereby judges are bound to follow previous decisions in cases where the material facts are sufficiently similar and the earlier decision was made in a court above the current one in the court hierarchy. This doctrine of precedent is extremely strong in English law as it ensures fairness and consistency and it highlights the importance of case
Premium Common law Stare decisis Law
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA ON 11.08.2014 Bill No. 96 of 2014 THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION BILL‚ 2014 A BILL to regulate the procedure to be followed by the National Judicial Appointments Commission for recommending persons for appointment as the Chief Justice of India and other Judges of the Supreme Court and Chief Justices and other Judges of High Courts and for their transfers and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-fifth
Free Judge Court