Kelcey PHIL 1320 Brant September 23‚ 2010 An Argument against Egoism I shall argue that the ideas of both psychological and ethical egoism are fundamentally flawed and should not be practiced. Egoism is flawed because it ignores the fact that people have a predisposition for compassion toward others that cannot be completely expelled from their motives of action. Egoism is also flawed due to the fact that altruism cannot coexist with egoism; therefore‚ because there is altruism in the world
Free Ethical egoism Egoism Individualism
we should vote in pursuit of a democratic ideal‚ and still others argue that we should vote out of respect for those who have defended our rights. As a consequentialist theory‚ utilitarianism is utterly unconcerned with these principle-oriented arguments. Utilitarians are concerned only with maximizing total social utility‚ or the overall well-being of society. Thus‚ utilitarians would assert
Premium Election Ethics Morality
This first stream of celebrity music fandom-as-religion literature demonstrates the type of argument many scholars favor when encountering expression of fan sentiment‚ fan action‚ and the structural and functional purpose of fandom. A second‚ smaller‚ stream of literature aligns or characterizes fandom as a cult‚ sometimes literally‚ while a third stream challenges the celebrity music fandom-as-religion argument. This
Premium
law they are considered to be the morally correct action‚ but when actions go against the law they are deemed immoral. The magisterium views homosexual acts to be against the natural law‚ because they are not considered to be complementary. This argument requires an acceptance that male-female sex is considered correct because anatomically male and female parts fit together‚ and have the capacity to create new life. This approach holds validity in that it accepts the biological necessity that life
Premium Homosexuality Marriage Sexual orientation
articles contain logical fallicies in their argument and use many of the same tactics to argue their point such as scare tactics‚ statistics‚ and quotes from people on the other side of the argument. However‚ the “Times of Trenton” editorial is able to cover up these fallicies and present their side in a cleaner and more efficient way than the “New York Daily News” by making the statistics seem more credible‚ the quotes from the other side of the argument more persuasive‚ and the overall organization
Free Homosexuality Same-sex marriage
The first argument is by J.J Thomson regarding abortion when it happens during consensual sex. She says that the woman has no obligation to keep the child‚ even though the woman had consensual sex and understood that she could become pregnant. Marquis talks about how everyone has a FLO account‚ and abortion would be killing‚ and killing causes premature death‚ so therefore‚ he believes that abortion is immoral in all cases including consensual sex. Judith Jarvis Thomson gives an analogy when it
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
universal Federal Governmental system. In Antifederalist Paper 84 Brutus questions the semblance of an individual governmental system as a direct violation of the rights by eliminating the individual freedoms promised in the Constitution. He defends his arguments by saying it is by nature that man will do what is in his own best interest and having one form of Government will jeopardize not only the existing but also the future generations. In his paper Brutus states: “rulers have the same propensities as
Premium
Argument and Citation: A Reflective Experience The issues four and five in Understanding Rhetoric provided a good sense of stunned comic relief and irony. These issues discussed argument and citation in depth. The issues were entertaining‚ informative‚ and clarifying in the topic discussed. The authors took each subject of the issue‚ and broke it down to the very foundation of the knowledge. The authors reconstructed the topics from the bottom up‚ helping to ensure the proper understanding of argument
Premium Writing Essay Writing process
His argument is founded on the idea that every human being is a rational agent who is self-aware‚ has free will and cannot be treated as a mere thing. He also describes a human being as self-owners. Self-ownership is the claim that individuals own themselves‚ their bodies‚ ability‚ talents and any products of their labor. They have all the authority over themselves. Because individuals are self-owners‚ they have certain rights to their lives‚ liberty as well as the products of their labor. Owning
Premium Anarchism Law Political philosophy
research findings which state global warming is happening‚ and there are also findings that this man-caused climate change is not evident. To the layman person‚ the conflicted issue can be rather confusing. The goal of this paper is to show which argument is stronger. International Climate Science Coalition (ICSC)‚ the interest group which focuses on publicizing the consequences of
Premium Global warming Carbon dioxide Earth