to say that by eliminating welfare‚ each person would have to pay less income taxes through obligatory payments. This would benefit society as a whole‚ since the number of Americans not on welfare outnumber the amount that are. Another reason a utilitarian would be opposed to welfare is because it allows people to be more complacent and lax about supporting themselves. By allowing people to not be productive citizens‚ they are not benefiting society as a whole‚ or the greatest amount of people. Another
Premium John Stuart Mill Welfare Utilitarianism
Christina Kiaer has described the main aim of the constructivist movement as ‘to mass produce transparent utilitarian things for use in everyday life’. How adequate is this description? Constructivism is primarily an art movement that was based in Russia in the early 20th century. It had a considerable link to the Russian Communist Revolution. They merged the arts with modern technological rationalism for political and ideological uses‚ being essentially a form of Soviet propaganda. The theory
Premium Russia Soviet Union Constructivism
various considerations. In deciding whether or not to torture a terrorist who has planted a bomb in New York City‚ a utilitarian must evaluate both the overall welfare of the people involved or effected by the action taken‚ and the consequences of the action taken. To calculate the welfare of the people involved in or effected by an action‚ utilitarianism requires that all individuals be considered equally. Quantitative utilitarians would weigh the pleasure and pain which would be caused
Premium Suffering Utilitarianism Torture
“What is Utilitarianism?” Ask a passerby to describe his personal morality‚ and you’ll likely get a complicated explanation filled with ifs‚ ands‚ and buts. Ask a utilitarian‚ and he can give a six-word response: greatest good for the greatest number. Of course‚ utilitarianism is not that simple. Like any philosophical system‚ it is the subject of endless debate. Still‚ for the average reader who is unfamiliar with the jargon that characterizes most philosophy‚ utilitarianism can be a useful tool
Free Utilitarianism Jeremy Bentham John Stuart Mill
seen that rule utilitarianism solves four out of five of the problems afflicting act utilitarianism. This isn’t bad. But does it have any problems of its own? I think it does‚ and I think the problems are related to the two questions that rule utilitarian would have us ask in order to assess the moral worth of any action. A Problem with Question 1 As we’ve seen‚ the first question rule utilitarianism has us ask is “What general rule would I be following if I did this particular action?” And you
Premium Morality Ethics
tilitarianism is a sort of mathematical morality. Rather than weighing on an individual’s conscience and values to make a moral decision‚ it provides him or her with an equation. If I make decision A‚ there will be X positive consequences and Y negative consequences; if I make decision B there will be X positive consequences and Y negative consequences. Therefore‚ it would be morally correct to choose A or B based on the highest number of positive consequences or the lowest number of negative consequences
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
Defining justice involves an in depth look at what we as individuals and a collective society value. Michael Sandel’s book Justice: What’s the right thing to do? does not attempt to answer these questions for us but rather implores us to look inside ourselves for the answers. This is accomplished by challenging the reader with cases‚ some hypothetical‚ and some real‚ in which the moral basis can be debated from different angles. We all have views on the death penalty‚ war‚ taxes‚ and religion but
Premium Political philosophy Morality Utilitarianism
information that the US needs to keep from having any more attacks‚ should torturing be allowed? Looking at it from a utilitarianism ethic view‚ a utilitarian is more concerned with helping the majority. If this known terrorist has vital information that can possible save hundreds maybe even thousands of people‚ then torturing is necessary. The mind frame of a utilitarian may feel that if a prisoner is suffering and in a lot of pain then he will confess or give
Premium Morality Torture Ethics
’The greatest good for the greatest number.’ Therefore‚ a positive utilitarian will say we should aim simply to increase the happiness of all those affected by our actions. Negative utilitarianism is the attempt to minimise the amount of misery. An action is right if and only if it produces at least as much good for all affected by the action as any alternative action the agent could do instead. Therefore‚ a negative utilitarian will say that we should seek to reduce the unhappiness of those affected
Premium
position between those who argue in absolutist terms that no restrictions on rights ought to be imposed or justified and those advocating a consequentiality approach who judge counterterrorist measure purely by their effectiveness. Prohibit certain torture‚ illegal detention‚ and unlawful assassination on the basis that they violate “foundational commitments to justice and dignity.” Democracies commonly permit derogations from guaranteed rights and freedoms in emergencies‚ so rights do not always trip
Premium Terrorism Violence Federal Bureau of Investigation