of state. Through his studies and works‚ three different theories of punishment are established. The utilitarian theory‚ the retributive theory‚ and the expressive theory are three possible reasons for punishment‚ which all hold some validity. The Utilitarian Theory of punishment seeks to punish those that break the law in order to discourage or deter future wrongdoing. According to the Utilitarian Theory‚ law should be used in order to maximize the happiness of society. Both crime and punishment
Premium Punishment Criminal law Crime
be elaborated on are the utilitarian approach and the universal approach. Several questions will be addressed‚ (1) what is the utilitarian and universal approach? (2) How do we use them in the ethical decision making process and (3) examples of how it relate in the field of Criminal Justice? When conflict arises it’s not always possible to decide who is right or wrong; however our moral responsibility is to resolve problems to the best of our ability. The utilitarian and universal theories are
Premium Health care Psychology Education
politicians. As a result of one Senator’s criminal acts‚ people’s distrust of politicians builds. Utilitarian Consideration Utilitarianism is considered a teleological theory‚ meaning that the rightness of actions is determined solely be the amount of good consequences they produce. According to utilitarianism‚ morality is about producing good consequences‚ not having good intentions. The utilitarian argument is
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Immanuel Kant
Aristotle and Utilitarians seem to voice different opinions when it comes to pleasure. Aristotle discusses pleasures to be a negative and is something not to indulge on frequently or often. He further explains how valuable it is that humans use the power of reason and critical thought to guide themselves throughout life towards happiness. Utilitarianism or The Greatest Happiness Principle speaks upon pleasure being the absence of pain. “It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied…”
Premium Ethics Morality Utilitarianism
give the appropriate moral weight to an agent’s personal point of view. First‚ Brink (1986: 431) denies that Utilitarianism fails to account for the individual preferences of the agent. He asserts that the Utilitarian recognises autonomy as a valuable component to be considered in Utilitarian calculus. That being so‚ he acknowledges that the principle of impartiality requires that any value to be attributed to an agent’s preference to determine their own projects must be given the same weight as
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Morality
most famous historical events that resulted from ethnic differences was the Holocaust. Hitler came to power in Germany and had to find a group of people to blame for the bad economy‚ so he decided to blame the Jews. He practiced what is called instrumentalism‚ which is a political mobilization based on changing what it means to be “those people”. Hitler redefined what it meant to be a Jew‚ making it into a negative term. Through extermination or genocide‚ the physical destruction of an ethnic group
Premium Sociology Culture Race
personal life. There are ethical lenses which include virtue theory‚ utilitarian and deontological theory. Virtue theory is dealing mainly with the character of a person. This theory emphasizes one’s character not he obligations or duties that are expected of them. Virtues are qualities that virtually morally good and desirable in a person. Utilitarian usually answers the question “What one ought to do in a situation.” A utilitarian may answer this question with the statement that individual should
Premium Ethics Morality
him would result in less aggregate pain for him. From this‚ the utilitarian would have to say that this is the right course of action. This seems counterintuitive. What that utilitarian is failing to ignore is the right to the man’s life. Even if his life has no value or happiness‚ he has still expressed his desire to live. In making the decision to kill him anyway‚ the utilitarian is placing no value on the man’s life; the utilitarian is playing God in saying that the morally right thing to do would
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics John Stuart Mill
do what has the best consequences‚ however utilitarians believe that the scope of relevant consequences is much broader. Egoist count only their own well-being‚ while utilitarians count the well-being of everyone. Utilitarianism is egalitarian in that it believes that everyone’s wellbeing is equal; no one persons’ well being is above anyone else’s. Also‚ utilitarians are impartial; moral reasons for actions are agent-neutral. This means that to utilitarians‚ the person conducting the action does not
Premium Ethics Utilitarianism Deontological ethics
Utilitarian monster is the name given to one or something that gets too much pleasure from an activity such that the pleasure outweighs the suffering that is as a result. So in the end it might seem practical to give what makes the majority happy or what maximises it because that is what matters most. Utilitarian look at the consequences as a result of an action‚ whether something is good or bad is determined by how much happiness it brings. So as long as something brings in much pleasure compared
Premium Utilitarianism Ethics Hedonism