Final Research Paper David Buckley HU1440: Rhetoric in Contemporary Culture 08/23/2013 ITT Technical Institute Richard Kmetz Final Research Paper Our forefathers with great fortitude put together a document that would be forever known as the constitution. This document addressed the rights of the citizens of the newly formed states. One amendment has been a focal point of discussion in recent weeks with the leakage of NSA protocol. The fourth amendment states‚ “The right of the people to
Premium United States Constitution United States Law
vehicle while the car smelled of marijuana. The officer had enough probable cause to believe Ross and Rachel were transporting illegal drugs‚ based on the amount of marijuana found in the vehicle making the arrest lawful. The arrest is considered a warrantless arrest which requires an officer to observe a crime being committed or has reliable knowledge that a crime has been or will be committed. 4. Yes the search of Ross and Rachel’s house
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
for possession of firearms and ammunitionWhether‚ under Georgia v. Randolph‚ a defendant must be personally present and objecting when police officers ask a co-tenant for consent to conduct a warrantless search or whether a defendant’s previously stated objection‚ while physically present‚ to a warrantless search is a continuing assertion of Fourth Amendment rights which cannot be overridden by a co-tenant. Fernandez argued that‚ under the Supreme Court’s holding in Georgia v. Randolph (2006) and
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Summary of the Article III of the 1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines Bill of Rights Article III enumerates the fundamental rights of the Filipino people. The Bill of Rights sets the limits to the government’s power which proves to be not absolute. Among the rights of the people are freedoms of speech‚ assembly‚ religion‚ and the press. An important feature here is the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus which have three available grounds such as invasion
Premium Law Human rights Common law
Amanda Grabowski American Government Essay #1 Supreme Court Case Riley V. California Facts of the Case The facts of the case stated that on August 2‚ 2009‚ Riley‚ who belonged to the one of the gangs of San Diego‚ California‚ and others shot at a rival gang member while driving past them. The shooters got into Riley’s car and drove away. Then‚ twenty days later on August 22‚ 2009‚ the police pulled Riley over driving a different car because of his expired license registration tags. They found
Premium
may not notice. Please give an example when knowledge of the 4th Amendment must be applied to a crime scene. An example of when knowledge of the 4th Amendment must be applied to a crime scene is when warrantless searches were or will be made. The evidence collected through warrantless searches can be deemed inadmissible in court. Please research and explain landmark case‚ such as Mapp v. Ohio‚ Terry v. Ohio‚ etc. On May 23‚ 1957‚ police officers in Cleveland Ohio suburb received information
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
and Fourteenth Amendment rights. The Court denied Wurie’s motion on grounds that the cell phone search was incident to his arrest and was limited and reasonable. The question that arises is does the Fourth Amendment allow police to conduct a warrantless search on the cell phone belonging to a person who has been lawfully arrested? Chief Justice Brown’s opinion is that a search of the cellphone of the convicted is
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
have expressed concerns over government overreach on their personal privacy. They believe that their private information being gathered by the government can be shared and used widely for unstated purpose without the public knowing. Engaging in warrantless surveillance in secret based on reasons without individuals’ consent is acceptable; however‚ engaging in surveillance of one’s private data based on assumption will cause many innocent individuals to
Premium September 11 attacks United States Terrorism
There are two main types of judicial interpretation used by judges: originalist and evolutionist (also known as living Constitutionalists. The interpretation method used by each judge is critical as it shapes his or her understanding and determination of law. Judges that used originalist interpretation judge cases by what they think that the Founding Fathers intended at the time the Constitution was drafted. This means that not only do they look to the Constitution for answers‚ but also sources
Premium United States United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Anti-Terrorism Organisation (Gato)." n.pag. Globalization Anti-Terrorism Organisation. Web. 23 Jan 2013. "Information on over 104‚000 terrorist attacks." (2012): n.pag. Global Terrorism Database. Web. 23 Jan 2013. "Key Events in the History of Wiretapping (sidebar)." Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services‚ 8 Nov. 2010. Web. 29 Jan. 2013. “Wiesel‚ Elie” the perils of indifference‚ American Rhetoric.com‚ 26 January 2012 from web. "Working Methods." Counter Terrorism Committee (2011): 1
Premium Terrorism