Baumrind vs. Milgram Milgram conducted an experiment which includes the subject of the experiment is in a laboratory environment and is told to give increasingly severe electric shocks to another person. The subject is getting told to do so by a person in a white lab coat‚ who appears to be a scientist; but is actually an actor. The person in the white lab coat tells the subject to continue to increase the level of shock the other person receives until they reach the level of “Danger Severe Shock
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
conformity‚ compliance‚ and obedience. Conformity is when one change as a result of the mere presence of other people‚ compliance is when one change because others ask for it‚and obedience is when one change because someone tells them to. 2. What were Milgram and Zimbardo’s findings? In Milgram’s initial obedience experiments he found all of the participants administered shocks to the confederate up to the 300-volts while 26 of the initial 40 participants administered fatal electric shocks. When he repeated
Premium Psychology Social psychology Sociology
to an article about an interesting experiment: The Milgram experiment. This experiment‚ developed and run by Stanley Milgram‚ took place at Yale University in 1961. Milgram’s experiment consisted of having volunteers from a diverse range of backgrounds and occupations individually brought into a room and sat at a table with an array of levers. Across from this volunteer was another person who knew about the parameters of the experiment‚ who was strapped into a fake electric chair. A “scientist” in
Premium
Imagine yourself being shocked as an act of you incorrectly answering a question. In the Milgram Experiment‚ 40 men were recruited using newspaper ads in order to preform a test that would question human obedience. The question posed was: would they comply with an authority figures commands because they were stressed to‚ or would they comply because they thought it was the noble thing to do? The results clearly show that under authority‚ people will comply with what they are told to do even if they
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
Daniel Parks Freshman Studies Term II Critical Analysis and Milgram’s Response Obedience to Authority and the obedience experiments that produced Stanley Milgram’s famous book have produced almost equal amounts of surprise‚ curiosity and criticism. The criticism of social psychologist John Darley and playwright Dannie Abse are each representative of the general criticism Milgram has received; Darley focuses on whether the study has any relevance to real world events (such as the Holocaust)‚ and Abse
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
Evaluating Essay The two articles “Student Grades and Average Ratings of Instructional Quality: The Need for Adjustment” and “What if Milgram Controlled Student Grades? A Simple Game for Teaching the Concept of Authority” that we had to read and annotate I found very interesting. The game they played and the statistics they showed in the two articles were so true. You see these things happening all the time through school‚ at home‚ and even at a work place. At school it tends to be some ridiculous
Premium Education Teacher University
1101-13 23 Febuary 2014 The Perils of Obedience by Stanley Milgram In “The Perils of Obedience‚” Stanley Milgram develops a experiment that puts to test the the question ‚ “Will humans inflict extreme pain to others under the command of higher authority?”. The essay starts off with Milgram explaining the history of obedience by exhibiting the loyalness that was portrayed by followers in historical documents. The experiment that Milgram set up was simple. He elected an “experimenter” who is the authority
Premium Stanford prison experiment Adolf Eichmann Experiment
beneficial information desired in the experiment and if the subject’s suffering is quickly and fully alleviated after the experiment. When questioning whether Stanley Milgram’s study of obedience is ethical‚ one must address these questions in the context of his experiment. The purpose of Milgram’s study of obedience was to determine the degree to which a person will be obedient to an authority’s orders or requests if they do not agree with the requests being made. This situation occurs in many
Free Psychology Stanford prison experiment Ethics
After learning about the Stanley Milgram experiment‚ I found myself questioning why and how the majority of the subjects that participated in the experiment were willing to inflict apparent pain and injury on an innocent person‚ and found myself curious as to how I would react should I but put in the same situation. I believe that the most significant reason for this disturbing absence of critical thinking and moral responsibility is because the subjects involved in the experiment were blinded by
Premium Stanford prison experiment Critical thinking Milgram experiment
The reason so many people obey instructions when they feel compelled remains challenging and difficult to understand in social psychology. However‚ social psychologist Stanley Milgram investigated the impact of authority figure on obedience in an experiment perhaps known as the best-known study in social psychology (Fiske‚ 2008). Also‚ the motivation for Stanley to conduct this experiment is to understand why individuals will engage in horrific acts that put others in imminent danger that can lead
Premium Milgram experiment Social psychology Stanford prison experiment