Preview

1881 Was The Main Cause Of The 1905 Revolution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1470 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1881 Was The Main Cause Of The 1905 Revolution
How accurate is it to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years from 1881 was the main cause of the 1905 revolution?

In some ways it is accurate to say that the growth of reformist groups in the years from 1881 was a significant cause of the 1905 revolution because they stirred up discontent amongst industrial workers and peasants. The social revolutionaries’ party was formed from ‘the peoples will’. These were a radical party that came around in the 1860’s. They split from the peoples will to form the SR. The majority of the SR consisted of the educated middle class; their aims were for the control of Russia to be in the hands of the people. Another reformist group is the Social Democrats Party that was also formed from the peoples
…show more content…
In the countryside the living conditions for the peasants were deteriorating due to some failed harvests. These failed harvests (e.g. the famine of 1891) caused there to be economic hardship amongst the peasants. This hardship caused the peasants to start taking notice and listening to the views of some radical and extremist parties and they shared similar views. This caused there to be an increased political participation amongst the peasants. Another factor that caused dissatisfaction among the peasants was the bloody Sunday massacre. On Sunday 9th of January 1905 father Gapon lead a peaceful protest towards the winter palace in St. Petersburg. However, the tsar was not at his palace yet had sent out instructions to crush any opposition towards him and his ruling. As the crowd continued towards the palace the army shot down and killed many protestors. This brutality was inhumane and ghastly causing many more people to question the tsar’s rule as he shot down people who were proudly holding his picture to signify their love for him however wanted to discuss change. This highlighted the futility of …show more content…
The assassination alexander 2nd persuaded his following generations (alexander 3rd and Nicholas 2nd) to follow a way of rule that meant that all reformist groups were repressed. It became a criminal offence to oppose the tsar or/and his government. There were Okhrana spies all over Russia that infiltrated and destroyed reformist and extremist groups. This policy weakened the main reformist groups, the populists, socialist revolutionaries and social democrats, but also forced them underground in any way, a further incentive to the reformists. The reformists hated that they were suppressed by the government and that the government now had power people’s opinions by making it illegal to oppose the tsar. The effects of the Russo-Japanese war and the Potemkin mutiny had a great significance to the 1905 revolution as the Japanese forces defeated the Russian armies which humiliated Russia. This defeat also meant that there was a great unrest within the government and within the faith that the people had in the government. The failure of the war undermined support for the tsar and gave encouragement to revolutionaries. This gave the revolutionaries an incentive to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Chapter 27 Review

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7: In 1905 a revolt was caused by the loss of the Russo-Japanese war. The Tsar tried to calm the people by reforming but eventually took away rights and the reforms fell apart.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far do you agree that the most important cause of the February 1917 revolution was the Great War?…

    • 1065 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The question is focused on the challenges mounted to Tsarist rule in the given period, and the extent to which divisions among opposition groups contributed to their failure. Answers may consider the four main strands of opposition, their internal divisions and their intolerance of each other. A tradition of revolutionary activity was established by the Populists and their appeal to the peasants, though they were weakened by the assassination of Alexander II and the repression established by Alexander III. The Social Revolutionaries tried to gain support among both peasants and townspeople, but were divided between anarchists and revolutionaries. The Social Democrats split into Bolsheviks and Mensheviks at the 1903 Congress, while the Liberals did not establish distinctive parties until after the 1905 Revolution. A simple description of some of the revolutionary parties will be marked within Levels 1 and 2, and progression will depend on the range and depth of relevant material.…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The divisions in the political opposition to the Tsarist rule were the next most important factor. The Populists were a socialist party, supported by peasants and urban workers, who wanted a socialist democracy for a Russian republic. Their assassination tactic strengthened other revolutionaries who opposed the tsarist government and attracted intelligentsia therefore depriving the government of them. This, it can be argued, delayed…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1883, the first Russian Marxist group formed in St. Petersburg in opposition to Alexander’s rule. Many attempts to overthrow Alexander were made by the proletariat who gradually grew in number throughout Alexander’s reign in response to the economic reforms that he continued to make. These workers eventually made up the group of people who revolted in the 1905 Revolution and this proves that Alexander III was not successful in suppressing opposition long term, as his attempts meant that a revolution would occur in the reign of the next Tsar.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reformist groups first came into Russia in the 1860’s. The first reformist group was known as the populists, they disliked the autocratic rule of the Tsar and wanted to change the way the government was run. Obviously the main aim for all reformist groups was to change the way the country governed. Therefore we saw large changes to reformist groups and we saw an increase in popularity in them. During and after 1898 we saw the emergence of reformist groups such as the socialist revolutionary party and the social democrat party. The socialist revolutionist party believed Russia’s future lay with peasantry and therefore disagreed strongly with the Tsar and the way Russia was governed. The social revolutionists were led by Viktor Chernov who gained support from many industrial workers. But the socialist revolutionists also gained the support of many extremists and even had its own terrorist group similar to ‘peoples will’. The socialist revolutionary party was an example of how reformist groups led to the 1905 revolution as they would often cause large-scale violence. In the years 1901-1905 the socialist revolutionary’s were…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Okhrana (the secret police) was also a big contribution in the weakening of the opposition to Tsarism because they were on the Tsars side, so they were advised to arrest anyone who did not obey the Tsars orders or were not being a true Russian. The Okrhana created a lot of tension because everyone, including people who were very close and loyal to the tsar were being checked and investigated. The censorship of newspapers and books was also another big problem. The Zemstova, Church and Tsar censored things that were not Russian as they believed it would cause an outburst of controversy. The Russians may read things that contradict the Tsar so they censored it and made sure no…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Be a bush if you can’t be a tree. If you can’t be a highway, just be a trail. If you can’t be a sun, be a star. For it isn’t by size that you win or fail. Be the best of whatever you are.”…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia was a huge country with millions of extremely poor farming peasants. These peasants lived horrible lives, many were starting to wonder why the tsar had all the wealth and they had none. In 1905 Russian Revolution was sparked off by a peaceful protest held on January 22nd. Thousands of demonstrators such as students, factory workers, revolutionaries, doctors and teachers marched through the cold and snow covered streets of St Petersburg to Winter Palace to protest about their lifestyle, led by a Russian Orthodox priest, Father Gapon. When the peaceful protestors arrived they were confronted by troops, which they fired on the crowd. After the firing had finished several hundred protestors lay dead, this event was called ‘Bloody Sunday’.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II survived the 1905 revolution because of extensive repression, political and economic reforms and Russification. These combined led to his survival because the reforms appeased some of the opposition, reducing its size, and the weak opposition, combined with extensive repression, led to the silencing of the opposition, and hence Tsar Nicholas’ survival. Furthermore, the Russification helped increase the loyalty of some of Russia’s minorities to the Tsar. Firstly, according to Leo Tolstoy, “One third of Russia is under a regime of reinforced surveillance……

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Significantly i strongly believe 'Bloody Sunday' was an extremely large contributor to the 1905 revolution; it can be described as the 'tip of the ice burg' for many of the Russian people. In particular after the big strikes in 1902-03, the Russo- Japanese war, and the crisis created by the war led to ferment across the Russian People. Bloody Sunday was a disaster for the government and the Tsar himself. Significantly, Tsar did not give the order himself however the people made him accountable for the massacre, they were no longer on the same side. The Tsar was the enemy. The people of Russia had previously referred to him as the 'little father'. However, due to the catastrophic decision the respect and loyalty for the Tsar had been destroyed in one day. This is a crucial part of the cause of the 1905 Revolution; wide spread outrage across the Russians and the apparent hatred for the Tsar. In particular the majority of the outrage built up from the peaceful protest ending in a mass killing. Significantly the leader of the protest was Father Georgi Gappon, whom organised a march to deliver a workers petition to the Tsar. The petition showed the incredible anger that existed among the workers, reading ' the limit of our patience has been reached, the terrible moment has come for us when it is better to die than to continue suffering intolerable…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays