Preview

How Far Do You Agree That the Use of Repression Was the Main Reason for the Weakness of Opposition to Tsarism in the Years 1881 – 1914?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
648 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Far Do You Agree That the Use of Repression Was the Main Reason for the Weakness of Opposition to Tsarism in the Years 1881 – 1914?
How far do you agree that the use of repression was the main reason for the weakness of opposition to Tsarism in the years 1881 – 1914?
I think that the use of repression is the main reason for the weakness of oppositions to Tsarism in the years 1881 – 1914. This is because of many different reasons and factors. One is because the Tsar enforced Russification of the country, meaning the people who were not necessarily a true Russian who enforced the Russian Orthodox Church were made to. People were taught about how Russia was great but not taught about the down sides and faults of Russia. The universities were shut down meaning there was less education to make people into the workers that Russia really needed. This resulted in many jobs that were needed to produce essentials had less people to do them so not enough merchandise was there. This also meant the Russian Orthodox Church taught the children in schools, as they had no teachers from universities to teach them. The cycle of Russification was coming around again as they were being taught the Russian history but not any defeats in wars and how to be a perfect Russian. Those who did not belong to the church were uneducated because they believed that only Russians who were part of the church should have the privilege to be educated.
The Okhrana (the secret police) was also a big contribution in the weakening of the opposition to Tsarism because they were on the Tsars side, so they were advised to arrest anyone who did not obey the Tsars orders or were not being a true Russian. The Okrhana created a lot of tension because everyone, including people who were very close and loyal to the tsar were being checked and investigated. The censorship of newspapers and books was also another big problem. The Zemstova, Church and Tsar censored things that were not Russian as they believed it would cause an outburst of controversy. The Russians may read things that contradict the Tsar so they censored it and made sure no

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    One thing that had changed in Russia from when Alexander had come into power in 1881 was that there was increased repression regarding politics. The Statue of State Security was introduced which brought government-controlled courts into the country and could now put on trial political opponents and they could also be arrested too without the need of a jury. This shows change as a lot harsher punishments were introduced that could be imposed on opponents of the government such as being sent to and exiled in Siberia and being hunted down by the Okhrana – Russia’s secret police. Although there was repression of political opponents before Alexander III’s reign, the punishment wasn’t as harsh and the violence that was encouraged by extremist groups was a lot more widespread and happened regularly compared to when Alexander III had introduced the Statue of State Security where attacks were something that didn’t happen as often. Therefore, it contributes to the idea that Russia was unrecognisable in 1894 compared with 1881.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the period 1855 to 1954, opposition to Russian governments was a common occurrence due to dissatisfaction of many civilians’ lives and the lack of development seen throughout Russia. However, as much as there were some successful movements throughout 1905 such as the Bolsheviks gaining support and eventually gaining power, there were also several failed attempts due to intense use of violence, terror and censorship by the state. It is arguable that whether opposition was successful, merely came down to the strength of the opposition group or the weakness of the government in power.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The autocratic rule that dominated the 300 year old dynasty was also a key factor in its destruction; the social unrest, clamour for political reform, backwardness of the Russian economy and the lack of reforms were all created by the Tsarist regime. The Romanov family ruled with an iron fist and used brutal violence to control its subjects. The repressive policies such as Russification and lack of effective reforms prevented the modernisation of the social and political aspects of the nation. Autocratic rulers promoted the feudalistic style class system which created extreme poverty in the lower classes and gave the people no political power. The introduction of ideas of liberty and an elected government into Russian society, contributed to the creation of revolutionary groups that aimed to overthrow the autocratic rulers and establish more liberal governments. This was first seen with the attempted political coup of the Decembrists that ultimately failed, however they were significant as the introduced a revolutionary trend and liberal views to the people. With the introduction of liberal views and equality, the people began to show their anger and frustration, caused by the Romanovs, through protests and revolutions, of which ultimately ended the Romanov Dynasty. The style of autocratic rulership is a key factor that impacted the fall of the Romanovs primarily because of the social issues it created.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of the opposition fled to other European countries where they continued to plot against the Tsar. This shows how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress politically by exiling all of their possible contenders. This allowed the Tsar to have much more control over Russia much like before Alexander ll reign. The persecution of Jews caused many to join radical parties and organisations. This shows us how there was not even the slightest bit of democracy within Russia, and how Alexander lll had caused Russia to go back in progress. Another major problem in Russia was the growing population of peasants. This caused famines within Russia in 1892 and 1893. This famine was a cause of many peasants death which shows how Russia did not have the money or resources to keep up with their growing population. This showed a lack in progress as they could not even support their country’s people with…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reforms and policies made during the last Tsarist years were not in the interests of the people but were made simply to maintain the power of the Tsar and his nobles. Most people would argue that during the years 1917-1964 there was more political freedom and less repression than in the Tsarist years. The provisional government did not meet the needs of the Russian people. They were an unstable and temporary government, and many people on the furthest parts of the Russian empire did not know about their existence. This provided them with many issues, such as trying to enforce democracy onto people they did not understand what democracy actually was. Many historians believe that at this point the people of Russia did not know themselves what form of government they wanted and due to the lack of education they did not know what form was best for them. In October 1917 came the Bolshevik revolutions. With their leader, Lenin, the Bolsheviks overthrew the provisional government and came into power. The leadership of Lenin was met with great approval from the people. Lenin promised political freedom unknown to them under the Tsars and Provisional government. In his rule…

    • 1370 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How far were divisions amongst opponents responsible for the survival of Tsarist rule, 1881 - 1905? Divisions of opposing groups of the Tsar were important to the survival of Tsarist Russia. However, other factors such as the church, the belief of the divine right, the army and the Okhrana were also effective in keeping the Tsar in a state of power. Firstly, the opposition groups of the Tsar were known as the Populists, the Liberals and the Marxists. Each group had its own ideas on what was needed for Russia and each group…

    • 555 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alexander strongly believed that to make his position as Tsar unchallengeable he had to withdraw the reforms his father had begun. To enforce these counter-reforms Alexander relied upon his secret police formed named the Okhrana, headed by Plehve. He used the Okhrana to help him govern Russia with terror and to get rid of any opposition. By 1894, over 5,400 people had been exiled to Siberia or sentenced to hard labour. Many people were also hanged and censorship was tightened significantly to stop the publication of anything that could fuel or encourage people to oppose Alexander.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    How far do you agree that the struggle for power following Lenin’s was caused by the ideological differences of the contenders of power?…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A key tool used to effectively rule Russia was that of censorship. As it allowed for the complete control and indoctrination of the people , with each leader adopting a different approach in the implementation . While initially censorship appears as a mere continuation as it was used by all six leaders , it is in fact a change as the level of use , alters throughout the period. The most lenient ruling was under Alexander II , Nicholas II and Khrushchev as they all adopted ' glasnost' ie free publication with no strict rules to abide by. Similarly under Nicholas II and Khrushchev there was an expansion of the press , with twice the amount of books being in circulation during the 1890's then there was in the 20's. Comparisons can be made between the way Alexander II , Lenin and Stalin used censorship to aid their ruling of Russia , all three clamped down on publications , with all press freedoms abolished. Lenin and Stalin continued in the same vein and had punishments in place for anyone who produced work which presented their regime…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsar had been handing much power back to the people, such as free speech, freedom of conscience and uncensored papers. This was to quell the first Russian Revolution and prevent any further uprisings and disputes. After Rasputin returned in 1912 he brought the Tsar into conflict with the now far freer press and brought back all the troubles which had been buried under the surface after the Tsar’s promises to the people.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin's Brutality

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages

    While Lenin rose to power on the ideals of fighting for the people, he committed heinous crimes against anyone who he considered was a threat to his new government. In doing so, Lenin started the Red Terror, a period of time where the new government attempted to find anti- communist or pro- monarchy citizens, often killing or enslaving those that they found. A task force that was known as the Cheka was put in place for that goal. The Cheka, a task force whose name has no formal translation, hunted down citizens who Lenin considered a threat to his regime. As the government had many that opposed the communist government, the police force created terror throughout much of the Russian population. Although the exact numbers of executions and deaths from the Red Terror is not known, some historians think that as many as half a million were killed by the Cheka. Yet, executions were not the only horrors that the Red Terror spread throughout Russia. Many members of opposition parties were sent to labor camps, which would become known in the Western world as concentration camps. The civilians unfortunate enough to be sent there were forced to work in horrendous conditions. Because of the poor working environment, many died in the labor camps. Lenin also essentially abolished Russia’s religious freedom, often persecuting minority groups such as the Orthodox Church, Catholics,…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin was more effective than any other ruler of Russia in the period 1855 – 1964 in dealing with opposition. How far do you agree?…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays